Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
03/03/17 -- Vol. 35, No. 36, Whole Number 1952

Co-Editor: Mark Leeper,
Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper,
All material is copyrighted by author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
inclusion unless otherwise noted.

To subscribe, send mail to
To unsubscribe, send mail to
The latest issue is at
An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at

        Mediterranean (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
        Mini-Reviews of 2016 Films (Part 4) (CAPTAIN FANTASTIC,
                THE LEGEND OF TARZAN) (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
        Microbes and Antibiotics (letter of comment by Fred Lerner)
                (letter of comment by Kip Williams)
        "Stigmata" (letter of comment by Kip Williams)
        THE SKILL OF OUR HANDS, Turner Classic Movies,
                and Near-Future SF (letter of comment by John Purcell)
        This Week's Reading (IN SEARCH OF THE CASTAWAYS
                OR THE CHILDREN OF CAPTAIN GRANT) (book comments
                by Evelyn C. Leeper)


TOPIC: Mediterranean (comments by Mark R. Leeper)

Does the Mediterranean really have hobbits and elves and dwarfs and
orcs?  I mean, doesn't it mean Middle Earth?  [-mrl]


TOPIC: Mini-Reviews of 2016 Films (Part 4) (comments by Mark
R. Leeper)

I have been asked where the films I review in mini-reviews can be
found.  I get many of these films before they play in theaters as
one of the perqs of being a film reviewer.  But for some of these
films I have no idea where they will show up.  Some may be
available from Video on Demand; most are available to rent on disk
can be seen on Netflix streaming.  (Not that I consider seeing it
at no charge is any sort of a bargain.)  About the best I can do
for the reader is to point out some film titles to remember and let
people know my opinion of the films.

As usual the films are rated on the -4 to +4 scale.

Ben is an aging hippie who is living out in nature leading his very
unconventional family.  Schooled by their father, even the ten year
olds talk like college professors.  And their sound minds are
packed in sound bodies.  They are superbly athletic.  And they live
in the forest and forage for what food the forest can provide
supplemented by occasional grocery shoplifting raids for which they
have been well-trained.  The death of their (absent) mother brings
this part of the family together with their mother's father.  He
sees how his grandchildren are living and finds it unnatural.  He
decides to take them a way from their father and give them a more
normal growing up experience.  Who is in the right?  Their father
feels they are being raised very well already.  The film leaves the
viewer to decide this very moot point.  The family's lifestyle is
presented non-judgmentally.  Ben has brought his family a good side
and a bad side and the viewer is left to draw his own conclusions.
Rating: +2

Suspenseful but slow as little by little we become aware the house
the film is set in is sinister.  Nurse Lily accepts a job of taking
care of a very old writer of ghost stories.  The young woman comes
to believe the house is haunted.  The film is made of eerie scenes
and most of the words spoken are Nurse Lily's dialog with herself.
The film had real possibilities, but it becomes mostly a test of
viewer patience.   Writer/director Oz Perkins takes a lot of time
creating atmosphere, but the film really needs more story to hold
the viewer.  I notice this film is available for streaming on
Netflix, but I am really not recommending it.  Rating: high 0

Tarzan films fail to have much story complexity, and this one is no
exception.  (As the villain says, "He's Tarzan.  You're Jane.
He'll come for you.")  In this film bad men come to the jungle.
They take Jane as hostage.  Tarzan comes to the rescue protecting
her from bad animals and the bad people.   Isn't that the plot of a
lot of Tarzan films? Visually the film is very nice in the first
quarter but the novelty wears off.  So most of the fun is in the
first part of the film it is nice to see Tarzan on a realistic
background rather than a Hollywood set, even if it is enhanced with
CGI.  Alexander Sarsgaard in the title role just does not look to
me like the Tarzan of the books.  He just does not seem like the
wild man raised by apes in the jungle.  Rating: +1



TOPIC: Microbes and Antibiotics (letter of comment by Fred Lerner)

In response to the comments on microbes in the 02/24/17 issue of
the MT VOID, Fred Lerner writes:

In this issue you refer to "Mark's comments that microbes resistant
to antibiotics will survive better and reproduce in the 02/17/17
issue of the MT VOID".  If that's the case I shall be sure never to
read that issue again.  [-fl]


(letter of comment by Kip Williams)

In response to Mark's review of BURLESQUE: THE HEART OF THE GLITTER
TRIBE in the 02/24/17 issue of the MT VOID, Kip Williams writes:

Another recent development in the art of the burly-Q is "Lucha
VaVoom"--the intersection of luchadores, comedy, and striptease:

It sounds intriguing, at least in concept, particularly if you like
to see outsized and overstated personalities showing their stuff.
But I've never actually seen any, which may be just as well.  [-kw]

Evelyn adds:

And speaking of luchadores, we saw a lunch trunk in Scottsdale,
Arizona, called "United Lunchadores".  See Roaming Hunger's picture
at  [-ecl]


TOPIC: "Stigmata" (letter of comment by Kip Williams)

In response to David Rubin's story "Stigmata" in the 02/24/17 issue
of the MT VOID, Kip Williams writes:

Kind of gives it all away in the title, and continues telegraphing
it.  With no real surprise in store, I didn't get much out of the
story.  Of course I felt sorry for the kid.  [-kw]


TOPIC: THE SKILL OF OUR HANDS, Turner Classic Movies, and Near-
Future SF (letter of comment by John Purcell)

In response to Dale Skran's review of THE SKILL OF OUR HANDS in the
02/24/17 issue of the MT VOID, John Purcell writes:

Many thanks once again for the weekly MT VOID, Mark and Evelyn.
Once again there are a couple items to mention.

First off, I enjoyed reading the first Incrementalist book by
Steven Brust and Skyler White.  It's a good concept and I thought
they did very well in THE INCREMENTALISTS (2013), plus it played
off of two of Brust's strengths: his love for playing poker and his
ability to create believable characters and dialogue.  He is a good
writer, no doubt, with a long string of popular novels, like the
Vlad Taltos series.  Have not read anything by just White yet,
although they do exist.  Her debut novel AND FALLING, FLY (2010)
was well-received, and she has had quite a few e-books published
since then, too.  Anyway, Dale Skran's negative review of THE
SKILLS OF OUR HANDS (2017) made me check out some of the user
reviews on Amazon, and the four reviews published there rate THE
SKILLS OF OUR HANDS quite highly.  Well, I can see why some readers
may not like the political commentary overtones of SKILLS--authors
trying to make their work relevant, I guess--but I'm willing to
give the second book of this series a shot.  Maybe if I read it a
little bit at a time...  [-jp]

In response to Mark's comments on Turner Classic Movies in the same
issue, John writes:

Back in late January we dumped our cable television provider and
switched to DirectTV, which is not only cheaper (half the cost for
the first year, and even when the second year hits it is still a
good amount less than Suddenlink's basic cable charge), but now we
get the Turner Classic Movies channel back--on our local provider
it's channel 554 (so odd seeing listings of over a thousand
channels!)--so the TCM listing for the weekend just after my
birthday (March 22nd) looks like a lot of fun, especially since
that is also AggieCon weekend (March 24-26, 2017), the local sf
convention, which I will be attending.  Between the local con and a
bunch of fun stfnal and horror and horrible stfnal movies, that
weekend looks like it's going to be a winner.  Plus--and this is a
big plus--our daughter's due date is March 25th, so we're going to
get another grandchild that weekend, too.  Heck of a deal, eh?

Mark responds:

I wonder if you are going to have time for all those films.  A new
baby is a major distraction.  [-mrl]

In response to Kosmogrrrl's tweet on near-future SF in the same
issue, John writes:

And finally, I have to agree with [the] comment that I am also
"increasingly impressed with anyone who manages to write near-
future SF under these conditions."  Ain't that the truth,
especially when it appears that the GOP apparently read Orwell's
NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR  (1949) as a blueprint or instruction manual
rather than as a cautionary tale.  Here's hoping we can survive the
next two to four years relatively intact.  All I can say is that
the way things are now, should I win this year's TAFF election to
the Helsinki, Finland WorldCon, I may not bother coming back.

Hate to say this, but a strong part of me really does feel that
way.  Trust me: I really *don't* like to feel this way.  [-jp]

And finally, John writes:

Enough of that.  I doth not like to end on a downer.  Thank you for
the fanzine, folks, and I look forward to next week's installment.


TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

978-1-4191-2581-2) is a novel in the same "series" as 20,000
loosely connected series.  Only one character connects 20,000
character (a different one) connects THE MYSTERIOUS ISLAND and IN
SEARCH OF THE CASTAWAYS.  This connection means that those who have
already read THE MYSTERIOUS ISLAND will have some of the surprises
in IN SEARCH OF THE CASTAWAYS spoiled for them.

I have a few complaints about Kessinger Publishing.  First, the
translator is uncredited.  (This is undoubtedly a public domain
translation by this point.)  The "formatting" was not checked--
every few pages the string "V. IV. Verne" (preceded by two new-
lines) appears in the text, often in the middle of a sentence.
Also, when someone says that something cost (e.g.) six pounds seven
shillings, it appears as "pound 6 7s."  Obviously they just
substituted the word pound for the actual symbol without worrying
about the correct grammar.

The volume is also that new wide, floppy trade paperback format
with large print and wide margins.  They probably did this to
justify the $37.95 price tag, but at that price, I want decent
proofreading.  (Especially since the book is available from Project

Verne made his share of mistakes as well, though.  The series as a
whole has serious chronological problems: Captain Nemo is at the
island for the entire period of THE MYSTERIOUS ISLAND, which began
during the American Civil War and ended several years later with
Nemo's death.  Yet 20,000 LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA begins well after
the end of the Civil War and Nemo is traveling around, hale and
hearty.  Nemo does not appear in IN SEARCH OF THE CASTAWAYS, but
its story starts in early 1864, and in December of that year, the
characters are talking about President Johnson and Lincoln's
assassination--except that it is still four months before that

Without Captain Nemo and the Nautilus, there is no science
fictional content to IN SEARCH OF THE CASTAWAYS, but it firmly in
the "exploration of remote lands" genre that was so popular in
Verne's time.  [-ecl]

Mark notes:

You are probably reading the Project Gutenberg copy of the book.
At a convention I talked to a book vendor who was selling Dr. Syn
books.  The "publisher" had looked in Gutenberg for novels of fan
interest.  The book was all typed in for him and he needed to do
only minimal, obvious editing.  He had the text printed and slapped
a large price tag on it as if this were a scholarly edition.  It is
being a minimalist book publisher.  [-mrl]


                                           Mark Leeper

           Do not let a flattering woman coax and wheedle
           you and deceive you; she is after your barn.