THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
09/14/01 -- Vol. 20, No. 11

Big Cheese: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
Little Cheese: Evelyn Leeper, evelyn.leeper@excite.com
Back issues at http://www.geocities.com/evelynleeper
All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Topics:
	HDTV (comments)
	BODIES IN A BOOKSHOP (book review)	

===================================================================

TOPIC: HDTV (comments by Mark R. Leeper)

THAT ITCHY, SWEATY PALM FEELING? IT'S HDTV.  So blares an ad in a  
magazine for a store that specializes in electronics.  Of course 
the ad  is hyping High Definition Television.  It is reaching out 
to anybody who  gets really excited about advances like HDTV.  
But I have to admit that  though I am really into movies, I am 
not all that excited about the  advent of HDTV.  I do not get 
sweaty palms thinking about it.  But why  am I not excited?  

Let us just take another look at that name, "high-definition  
television."  You have the adjective "high-definition" and a noun  
"television." It is really just an enhancement on television.  
Consumer  television came along in the late forties and early 
fifties.  We are  just passing the half-century mark for the 
introduction of devices to  bring pictures that move into the 
home.  Go back another half century  and you are to the point 
that a reasonable technology for creating  moving pictures had 
come along was first taking hold.  Now that was an  innovation 
that justifiably gave people itchy, sweaty palms!  

There are some that say that the motion picture was really the  
completion of an art that goes back to cave paintings.  Certainly 
early  in representational art the artist became dissatisfied 
that his  paintings were fixed in time and what he saw in the 
real world moved.   In a sense all still painting is a lie, or at 
the very least  unrealistic.  When Rembrandt painted a person he 
wanted to capture that  person on canvas.  But he had to remind 
the person to keep still and not  move.  To get a realistic 
portrait of the person the subject had to  behave unrealistically 
still.  Modern photographers still have the  problem.  They pose 
people and then tell them not to move.  People and  things in the 
real world move and change.  They have motion.  But oil  cannot 
move on canvas so the painting is a misrepresentation.   

It took until the early 1900s for there to be a viable technology 
to put  motion into art.  And the very earliest commercial films 
did not even  have a story.  They were just pictures of things 
the photographer saw in  the world around with that super-special 
new added feature, movement.   Note we still use the words 
"movie," "motion picture," and "cinema"  [from the same root as 
"kinetic" or "moving"].  This is true in spite of  the fact that 
we are a long way past the point that promoters of this  summer's 
blockbusters want to emphasize is that they ACTUALLY MOVE and  
are not just still pictures.  This was pretty exciting stuff a 
century  ago.   

Fifty years later was another watershed in communication of 
moving  visuals.  Again itchy sweaty palms were in order.  You 
could bring a  picture with motion, if not a motion picture, 
right into your home.  The  difference was a lot like the 
difference it made when computers could be  brought into the home 
and just ordinary people could own them.   

Now 50 years later we are moving into the era of HDTV.  Another 
big leap  forward? Hardly.  As the name indicates HDTV is a 
refinement on  television.  The problem is that you reach a point 
of diminishing  returns with what new technology buys you.  HDTV 
is a big investment and  it brings you a better picture than VHS 
and even a somewhat better  picture than DVDs give you.  HDTV is 
a medium for the person who says  the glass is 3% empty, not 97% 
full.  HDTV will moderately improve the  experience of seeing a 
noisy special effects movie like ARMAGEDDON.  It  is not clear it 
offers any real advantage at all in seeing a great film  like 
TWELVE ANGRY MEN.  In that film the value is in the dialog and 
the  acting.  It was a story originally written for the tiny, 
black and white  TV screen and that is about all it requires.  
HDTV may be a medium for  someone who enjoys a film like 
ARMAGEDDON, but it will do little for the  fan of TWELVE ANGRY 
MEN who does not need to hear Jack Klugman in eight  channel 
stereo or to see a crystal clear image of Jack Warden's face.   

HDTV is a refinement on existing technology.  TV has come a long 
way  since the 1950s.  The picture is color, a lot clearer, and 
the shape of  the picture is less dictated by the shape of the 
vacuum tube.  But if  there is an improvement somewhere out there 
of the magnitude of the  invention of the motion picture or of 
television, I am missing it.   Perhaps technology has slowed, or 
perhaps it really is out there I am  just not recognizing it.  
Perhaps innovations fusing the motion picture  with the Internet 
will eventually have a big influence.  But I think  that fifty 
and a hundred years ago there were a lot of people who were  
excited about changes in the representation of motion in art.  
Today the  next sweaty palm experience is running behind 
schedule.   [-mrl]

===================================================================

TOPIC: BODIES IN A BOOKSHOP by R. T. Campbell (Dover, 1984 
(c 1946), trade paperback, $3.95, 178pp) (a book review by Evelyn 
C. Leeper):

Let me just quote the first paragraph
"I don't know what came over me.  It wasn't as if there were not 
enough books in the house to begin with.  There were books on the 
floor, books on the beds--and in the beds if one wasn't careful.  
Only that morning I had removed three volumes of Curtis from my 
room.  How they came to be there I would not know.  There seems 
to be a plot between the old man, Professor John Stubbs, and his 
housekeeper, Mrs. Farley, to dump anything they like in my room.  
So far as I am concerned this is fine.  I like books.  But I have 
books enough enough and mess enough of my own."

Then two paragraphs later:

"Having made up my mind that I wanted the life of Robert Boyle I 
started going round all the bookshops I could find.  This was 
fine, but I kept running into others books I wanted.  I spent the 
devil of a lot of money.  I said to myself that it didn't really 
matter very much if I failed to get the 'Life of Boyle,' I had 
gathered enough to keep me reading for at least a fortnight."

(Okay, only a fortnight's worth of reading on a book trip is a 
bit light.)

Anyway, the narrator finds two dead bodies in a bookshop off 
Tottenham Court Road,  His off-hand comments would seem to 
indicate that this is not the first time he has stumbled onto 
deceased persons, though Dover doesn't indicate any earlier books 
in a series.  The deaths--murders, of course--are all tied up 
with the London used booksellers, trafficking in stolen rare 
books and in high-quality pornography.

It is all vaguely reminiscent of THE CLUB DUMAS crossed with 
84, CHARING CROSS ROAD, and if all this doesn't get you to want to 
read it, nothing else I can say would help.  [-ecl]

===================================================================

                                          Mark Leeper
                                          mleeper@optonline.net

	Virtue has never been as respectable as money. 
                                          --Mark Twain


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/47cccB/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/J.MolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
mtvoid-unsubscribe@egroups.com

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/