THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
02/15/02 -- Vol. 20, No. 33

El Presidente: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
The Power Behind El Pres: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
Back issues at http://www.geocities.com/evelynleeper
All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Topics:
	Note on VOID Schedule
	European Anti-Americanism (comments by Mark R. Leeper)

===================================================================

TOPIC: Note on VOID Schedule

This week's issue is being sent early due to Boskone, even though 
dated Friday, February 15.  Next week's issue will be sent on 
Friday as usual (February 22).  [-ecl]

===================================================================

TOPIC: European Anti-Americanism (comments by Mark R. Leeper)

I have been reading from several different sources about the new 
acceptability of anti-Americanism in Europe.  Anti-Semitism and 
anti-Zionism have been linked and fairly common in world media for 
a long time but anti-Americanism has been mostly separate.  
However, the United States's support of Israel has caused most of 
the Middle East to link America and Zionism and that connection 
has been readily picked up by Europe, so that the three "anti" 
ideologies have become connected.  Some of the same engines that 
pull anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism pull anti-Americanism and the 
three are acceptable in much of the world, not excluding the 
United States. 

An article in the October 1, 2001, BUSINESS WEEK reported on some 
of the international reaction following the September 11 attack.  
A caller to Radio France Internationale asked, "What is so special 
about the American dead?  Millions have died in Africa, but they 
never left messages on answering machines since they were too poor 
to have cell phones."  In China one of the electronic bulletin 
boards complained, "They are constantly intervening in other 
countries' affairs.  This is an opinion shared by all my co-
workers."  These two people may think that they agree, and they do 
as far as whom they are complaining about, but their complaints 
are really diametrically opposed.  One complains because the 
United States is not intervening enough in Africa; one complains 
that the United States intervenes too much.  This is the price of 
being the leading military superpower.  Once you have the power to 
shape other countries' affairs you are damned if you do and damned 
if you don't.  Some people want the United States to police the 
world, others want them to stay out of other countries' business.  
It is impossible to please both camps. 

I was in Australia during the East Timor crisis in 1999.  This was 
the furthest I had ever been from the United States, 
geographically if not culturally, and not far from the opposite 
point on the globe from my home.  People were dying in nearby East 
Timor as the Indonesian government was trying by any means 
necessary to hang onto control.  The Indonesian military was 
committing atrocities against people of the pro-independence 
movement.  This was a very near neighbor of Australia.  And 
Australians I heard on the radio were irate.  Why wasn't the 
United States doing anything to stop the killing?  Why weren't 
they sending in troops?  Does it not matter to the Americans 
because it is not in their part of the world?  These people had no 
expectation that their own government had any responsibility 
either because of geography or morality.  If my understanding is 
correct, Australia did eventually intervene, but only after it was 
clear that the United States would not be the world's policeman in 
this affair.  Any tragedy that the United States had the power to 
avert but did not avert is the fault of the United States.  If the 
United States does try to intercede and fails, as it attempted to 
in Somalia in 1993, it is condemned for its failure.  It is 
interesting that this complainer is French.  France is a country 
that has no small reason to be grateful to the United States after 
two World Wars the last century.  France's own incursions in the 
African continent have been less than benevolent.  But he assumes 
that if there are so many dead in Africa it has to be the fault of 
the United States. 

One of the chief charges against the United States is cultural 
imperialism.  The complaint is that McDonalds and American movies 
are invading so many foreign countries and taking healthy root.  I 
admit myself to be disappointed to go to Hong Kong and see 
McDonalds was a going concern there.  But their tactics did not 
appear to be at any time be using force to get customers into the 
store.  McDonalds is profitable in Hong Kong because there are 
large numbers of people in Hong Kong who want to eat at McDonalds.  
The best way to avoid having to eat a McDonalds hamburger is 
simply not to buy one.  This is by no means a "conversion by the 
sword."  The only thing forcing this product on people is its 
popularity.  The same goes for Coca-Cola and Sylvester Stallone 
movies.  The United States has just had a very successful century 
at least economically and Europe has responded first with a sort 
of cultural pride and even arrogance, and by trying to copy the 
united states concept by uniting their own states and creating 
their own single currency.  This is imitation and implicitly the 
sincerest form of flattery.  To remain even-handed they must 
counter the unavoidable compliment with criticism.  They want 
Europe to be a single economic giant like the United States, but 
the United States has done it wrong in dozens of ways they are 
happy to list and they are going to do it right.  They begrudge 
the United States its economic success while trying to emulate it. 

Much of Europe are those who want to remain even-handed and take a 
middle view between the American view and that of the people who 
are anti-American.  But the gap where they are standing is 
becoming wider by the month.  To stand between the policies of the 
United States and those people rabidly opposed to those policies 
one has to make oneself half-rabid.  As they continue to stand 
halfway in that widening difference we can expect to see them move 
further and further away.  [-mrl]

===================================================================

                                          Mark Leeper
                                          mleeper@optonline.net


           Congress - these, for the most part, illiterate 
           hacks whose fancy vests are spotted with gravy, 
           and whose speeches, hypocritical, unctuous, and
           slovenly, are spotted also with the gravy of 
           political patronage. 
                                          - Mary McCarthy

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Access Your PC from Anywhere
Check Email & Transfer files - Free Download
http://us.click.yahoo.com/NxtVhB/3XkDAA/_ZuFAA/J.MolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
mtvoid-unsubscribe@egroups.com

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/