THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
01/24/03 -- Vol. 21, No. 30
Big Cheese: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
Little Cheese: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
Back issues at http://www.geocities.com/evelynleeper
All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Topics:
THE LORD OF THE RINGS Satires
Mark Leeper's Top Ten Films of 2002 (comments by
Mark R. Leeper)
Farewell to The Stars Our Destination (comments by
Bill Higgins)
CHICAGO (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
This Week's Reading (PAST IMPERFECT, new "Foundation"
trilogy, DEAD SOULS) (book comments by
Evelyn C. Leeper)
===================================================================
TOPIC: THE LORD OF THE RINGS Satires
If you want to see lots of samples of "The Lord of the Rings" as
it would have been written by other famous authors, see
http://tinyurl.com/4ahm. (The actual URL is buried deep in
http://boards.straightdope.com.) [-ecl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: Mark Leeper's Top Ten Films of 2002 (comments by Mark
R. Leeper)
Well, it is time again to list my top ten films of the previous
year. I am sorry that my list comes out after so many others
have been published. Some reviewers announce their top ten
lists in the middle of December. As for me, I am lucky if I
have seen all the major films of the previous year by the end of
January. I have decided not to include films that I have seen
over the year that have not yet been released in this country.
Too many of my readers will have forgotten I rated some of these
highly by the time they finally do get released. In fact, the
best film on this year's list falls into that category. I saw
THE GREY ZONE at a film festival something like September 13,
2001. Harvey Keitel was there to introduce the film but instead
just asked for a moment of silence for those killed two days
earlier. I was hoping that the reviews it got bore out my high
regard for the film. I was pleasantly surprised (if I can say
that in conjunction with this very bleak films) that the critics
did see the same power and quality in the film that I did.
So what films have I seen but did not listed for this
technicality? TOGETHER is a delightful film about a Chinese
child prodigy violinist whose father takes him to Beijing so
that he can develop his talent. It has just beautiful music,
surprising and interesting characters, and is a real pleasure.
I understand it has been scheduled for release in this country
so hopefully it will be on next year's list. I might suggest
that you write down this next title. I saw it in a theater
packed with Russian-speaking people who knew better than I what
to expect. Apparently the film is known in Russia (under the
title OLIGARKH), and I hope it becomes known in this country.
The English title is TYCOON. I think it probably occupies the
same place in Russian society that THE GODFATHER has here. A
wealthy and unpopular businessman, a little dishonest, is
murdered. We then see the events after the murder and
flashbacks telling how he got to his position as one of Russia's
wealthiest businessmen. At the same time, it tells of what
happened to Russian business under Communism and after its fall.
TOGETHER and TYCOON are both well worth remembering.
There will be some who will note the conspicuous absence of THE
TWO TOWERS. Have I become disenchanted with the LORD OF THE
RINGS? No. I just refuse to give three +4s to each of the
thirds of what I consider to be a single film. I probably will
not put THE RETURN OF THE KING on my top ten list next year.
Suffice it to say, I am impressed by the film THE LORD OF THE
RINGS and still consider it to be only one film that I have
already given a +4 to last year.
I will list my ten films in increasing order. (Oh, each film
below is rated on a scale of -4 to +4).
10. ABOUT SCHMIDT (high +2): This is an adult film in the best
meaning of the term. It is the kind of motion picture where the
viewer repeatedly sees people he knows. Jack Nicholson's
repressed rage and his pitiable side have never been shown to
better advantage. Though the story could have been better this
film has a great character study from Alexander Payne, the
director of CITIZEN RUTH and ELECTION.
9. THE ROAD TO PERDITION (high +2): In 1931, circumstances make
a father and son fugitives from the Capone organization. The
moving story about two different father-son relationships
follows a once-loyal hit man forced to take actions that will
make him a legend. The film has a simple plot of a Western set
in the East, but acting and beautiful photography turn this into
an emotionally charged and memorable film. A curiously low-key
performance by Hanks meets an interesting killer played by Jude
Law. Paul Newman plays a powerful local gangster.
8. GANGS OF NEW YORK (high +2): Martin Scorsese recreates slum
and gang life in Civil War Era New York City. It is a cutthroat
world where virtually everyone is a criminal and everyone is a
victim to some degree. The historic background alone is worth
the price of admission, even if the foreground story is a little
hackneyed at times. This is an always-fascinating historical
film with a lot of factual detail. Bill "the Butcher" Cutter is
a unique character, based on the real Bill "the Butcher" Poole.
7. ADAPTATION (low +3): This is Spike Jonze's and Charlie
Kaufman's follow-up film to BEING JOHN MALKOVICH. I think that
Charlie Kaufman has in one stroke made his the most recognizable
screenwriter's name in the country. His new film is a
meditation on the forces that make films successful; it is also
a philosopher's chestnut and a marvelous mental toy. This is
the kind of film that viewers can discuss for hours.
6. THE QUIET AMERICAN (low +3): Michael Caine gives one of his
best performances as Thomas Fowler, in this story of a worldly
English journalist and his relationship to a naive American who
has strong ideas how to shape Vietnam. Graham Greene wrote the
novel set in 1952 Vietnam. The story is powerful and only
became more so as the United States became more involved in
Southeast Asia. This is a riveting film.
5. MIYAZAKI'S SPIRITED AWAY (low +3): Hayao Miyazaki, creator
of MY NEIGHBOR TOTORO, KIKI'S DLIVERY SERVICE, and PRINCESS
MONONOKE gives us a masterpiece of fantasy in the anime that is
as timeless as Lewis Carroll's Alice stories and enjoyable for
just as wide an audience. This film may even beat THE LORD OF
THE RINGS for most imaginative film of the year. Watch for the
*real* Spiderman.
4. MINORITY REPORT (+3): Steven Spielberg adapts a story by
Philip K. Dick. He mauls the intent of the original story but
creates a marvelously faceted and incredibly dark vision of the
future with its own virtues. MINORITY REPORT is fast-paced, yet
still full of ideas. It is probably a better science fiction
film set in a more complex society than was BLADERUNNER (also
non-faithfully based on a story by Philip K. Dick).
3. WE WERE SOLDIERS (+3): Mel Gibson stars in a chronicle of
the bloodiest three days of the battle of Ia Drang in the
Central Highlands of Vietnam. It is probably the best account
of the Vietnam War experience I have seen, for once told with
respect for the soldiers on both sides. Gibson plays the
commander of the American Seventh Cavalry in Vietnam. The scene
of his leaving his family and going off to war is as moving and
poignant as the scene of Frederic March returning from war to
his family in THE BEST YEARS OF OUR LIVES.
2. THE PIANIST (+3): This is the violent and harrowing true
story of brilliant Jewish pianist Wladyslaw Szpilman who
survived two uprisings against the Nazis in Warsaw. This must
have been a very personal film for Roman Polanski who survived
the Krakow Ghetto. The story has some real depth and moral
complexity.
1. THE GREY ZONE (high +3): A good cast in a stark and grim
drama of the Sonderkommandos in Auschwitz who preserved their
lives by doing terrible work for the Nazis murdering their
people. The continuation of their very lives was a figurative
moral gray zone. An example of what can be done with writing.
This is a haunting film.
[-mrl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: Farewell to The Stars Our Destination (comments by Bill
Higgins)
[The science fiction specialty shop The Stars Our Destination, a
long-time staple of the Chicago area, is closing its doors the end
of February, though owner Alice Bentley will continue it as a
mail-order business. Bill Higgins wrote this "obituary" on hearing
the announcement.]
I'm sorry it has to end, but I'm really glad I was there at the
beginning.
I remember Alice resigning from atom-smashing at Fermilab to open
a bookstore. Endless discussions in quest of the perfect name.
Cleaning and painting the first store on Clark Street in the
spring of 1988. The blowout Grand Opening party.
The glorious neon rocket in the window. Signings, readings,
fannish gatherings and Magic games. The little section of cool
science books that Alice always maintained. Shelves teeming with
used SF paperbacks. All the eccentric, but fascinating,
characters who worked behind the cash register over the years--
not least Alice's mom, Sheila.
Alice, smart as a Mentat and cute as a smeerp, brimming over with
enthusiasm as she recommended books.
(For a time, she owned every remaining hardcover volume of BRIDGE
OF BIRDS. Copy by copy, she sold 'em all. Then she became a
publisher and put all three Master Li novels into an omnibus.)
Many TSOD anniversary celebrations. I hope the books I bought
compensated for all the snacks I ate over the years. Smoffing in
the aisles. The party where, for no good reason, a bunch of us
alphabetized a huge disorganized stack of R. Lionel Fanthorpe
novels.
Alice called me one day when the TV show "Wild Chicago" was
turning its fisheye lens on TSOD, to come down and liven up the
place with some ukulele filking.
Every few months some acquaintance would tell me "Hey! I saw you
on TV!" and I would know that "Wild Chicago" had repeated that
episode again.
It's been a truly grand place. I've had fun every time I walked
into TSOD. And I'm grateful to Alice (and to Mike and Greg K. and
all the others) for bringing it into existence, and for keeping it
going so long. Soon it'll be history. [-wh]
===================================================================
TOPIC: CHICAGO (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
CAPSULE: The big, brash Broadway musical comes to the screen
with a film that gives the impression of what made it popular on
the stage but does not really recreate it. Sadly, the play was
written as a showcase for choreography and Bob Fosse's fancy
footwork has been largely supplanted by fancy editing. Queen
Latifah belting out "When You're Good to Mama" is the musical
high-point of the film. Rating: 7 (0 to 10), low +2 (-4 to +4)
My first few days of this year were spent in friendly debate
with a friend over the merits and failings of the musical MOULIN
ROUGE! and the supposed superiority, as he saw it, of the film
of CHICAGO. My friend complained about Baz Luhrmann's technique
of showing the dancing in short, choppy cuts. If I wanted to
see how to film a musical I should see CHICAGO. I am grateful
to my friend for sensitizing me to this issue, but I conclude
from watching the dance sequences that much the same editing
style was used in both films. Watching CHICAGO one is very
hard-put to find any takes of duration greater than two seconds,
maybe ffity frames. And the editing style may be used for the
same reason. Each gives a rapid-fire montage to create a sense
of excitement about each film's particular setting and time
period.
The impression one gets is that one is looking at the actions
from one angle and then another, much like live television going
from one camera to another. In fact, pieces are juxtaposed that
could have been filmed hours or even months apart. Much more of
the meter and flow are created by the editor than by the dancer.
Big-name stars can do their own dancing by learning two steps at
a time, having them filmed, and then forgetting about them and
learning the next two steps. Those short clips can then be
edited together to make them seem like one long routine. While
CHICAGO features Catherine Zeta-Jones, Renee Zellweger, and
Richard Gere all apparently dancing skillfully, only Zeta-Jones
had formal training as a dancer prior to this film and it shows.
Bob Fosse specifically wrote CHICAGO to be a showcase for his
style of dancing and we do not really see it in this film.
The story of the Roxie Hart's sensational killing of Fred Casely
in Chicago made headlines in the 1920s and the incident was
adapted into a play. In 1927, the play was the basis for the
film CHICAGO. William Wellman remade CHICAGO in 1942, calling
it ROXIE HART. Bob Fosse took the story and made it into the
lush Broadway musical. Seventy-five years after the first film
version of the story, Bob Fosse's play has been made into a
movie one more time.
The story is fairly simple. Showgirl Roxie Hart (Renee
Zellweger) kills her lover and convinces her husband Amos (John
C. Reilly) to say he did it. She is found out and put in prison
under corrupt matron 'Mama' Morton (Queen Latifah).
Historically, having a black prison matron in the 1920s is
questionable, but when audiences see the performance, I don't
think they will mind a bit. In prison Roxie finds herself
competing with another murderess, Velma Kelly (Catherine Zeta-
Jones). Richard Gere plays Billy Flynn, Roxie's defense
attorney. He knows that she is guilty, but as the tagline says,
"Anywhere else it would be a crime, but this is Chicago."
Renee Zellweger shakes her shy-girl image but is just not very
absorbing playing Roxie as a not-too-bright blonde. Catherine
Zeta-Jones can dance but the 1920s fashions do not suit her
personality well. Gere is about the right combination of
smooth, vain, and a little slimy. Frequently, pop music stars
are cast in films because their has marquee value. They then
fade quickly from sight. Queen Latifah seems to get better and
better as an actress. In CHICAGO she is captivating in ways
that the three nominal leads cannot touch. Latifah is a real
scene-stealer and her "When You're Good to Mama" is probably the
most memorable song in the film. The film is directed and
choreographed by Rob Marshall who also directed ANNIE for
television. While the movements are not so sinuous as we would
have with Bob Fosse, the idea is there. John Myhre's production
design gives a very 1920s atmosphere to the entire proceedings.
Danny Elfman did the composing for the new music.
CHICAGO is a vigorous and creative musical made all the more
notable by the current dearth of cinematic musicals being
produced. It is a reminder that the genre of the movie musical
is not dead, but merely sleeping. I give it a 7 on the 0 to 10
scale and a low +2 on the -4 to +4 scale. [-mrl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
Most of this week's reading was "magazine catch-up"--issues of
ASIMOV'S, F&SF, LOCUS, etc., that have piled up. I also read more
short fiction in the anthology PAST IMPERFECT (edited by Martin
H. Greenberg--of course--and Larry Segriff). It's yet another
argument against themed anthologies with a lot of just average
stories about time travel, with the only memorable story being "The
Gift of a Dream" by Dean Wesley Smith--and it seemed to include
time travel merely as an afterthought, something needed to place it
in this anthology. It would have been every bit as good without
it, or indeed without any fantastical element whatsoever.
I also finished the third book of the new "Foundation" trilogy,
which comprises FOUNDATION'S FEAR by Gregory Benford, FOUNDATION
AND CHAOS by Greg Bear, and FOUNDATION'S TRIUMPH by David Brin.
Of the three, Bear's book captures the feel of the original
trilogy the best, and hence was the one I liked the most. I had
some problems/complaints with the structure of the Benford, and
while it could be that Brin's was more accomplished than Bear's,
my feeling is that the goal should be to "mimic" Asimov more
closely. (Which is not to say I didn't like Donald Kingsbury's
PSYCHOHISTORIC CRISIS, but that was doing something else. Insert
obligatory Walt Whitman quote here.)
I also read DEAD SOULS. No, this is not a new horror novel, but
the Nikolai Gogol classic. I had put it on my list of books to
read because Robert Silverberg recommended it in a column in
ASIMOV'S about a year ago, and on the basis of this and of his
recommendation of H. D. F. Kitto's GREEK TRAGEDY at some point
before that, I have concluded that I should definitely pay
attention to what he recommends. Warning: If you are reading the
Signet/NAL edition of DEAD SOULS, do not read the introduction,
which somewhat spoils the revelation of Pavel Ivanovich
Chichikov's motivation. Gogol writes (at least in that
translation) in a very conversational style, talking directly to
the reader, and also manages to have a level beneath that of Gogol
implicitly commenting on the narrator's prejudices and biases.
And before someone complains about "long Russian novels," I'll
note that it is under three hundred pages. [-ecl]
===================================================================
Mark Leeper
mleeper@optonline.net
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic
is no more to the point than the fact than a
drunken man is happier than a sober one.
-- George Bernard Shaw
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
mtvoid-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/