THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
05/09/03 -- Vol. 21, No. 45
Big Cheese: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
Little Cheese: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
Back issues at http://www.geocities.com/evelynleeper
All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Topics:
More on Psychics (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
X2 (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
Why Taxes Need To Be High (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
This Week's Reading (GRAVEN IMAGES; THE CULT OF
INFORMATION; VICTORIAN INVENTIONS; GREETINGS,
CARBON-BASED BIPEDS!) (book comments by Evelyn
C. Leeper)
===================================================================
TOPIC: More on Psychics (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
In our last issue I was talking a little about psychics and the
fact that our rather rationalist publication has, of necessity, to
get emailed out with an ad for psychics. We cannot even find out
in advance to warn people since Yahoo chooses the ad at the time
of mailing. To make matters worse we seem to get psychics' ads
more often than we would by chance. Yahoo is probably looking at
the content of the mail, via a software program, and the machine
is saying to itself, "Ah, people with an interest in science
fiction. They are likely to be interested in psychics." That
probably means we will be specially targeted for that sort of ad,
at least until someone comes along selling tapes of the alien
autopsy. I was reminded of the public attitude of science fiction
when the New Orleans science fiction Worldcon convention Nolacon
shared a hotel with a Southern Baptist Convention. Ironically the
two groups got along like Alan Dean Foster's humans and his
amicable Thranx, and I suspect the science fiction people were the
Thranx. I shared an elevator with an older gentleman who asked
what our convention was about. I told him it was a science
fiction convention. He nodded sagely and said, "That probably a
good idea because, you know, you never can tell." I think the
Yahoo software has the same attitude toward science fiction fans.
But it would not be surprising if a bunch of fans out there did
believe in psychics. I know one member of my family pointed out
how amazing the psychic powers of John Edward on the "Crossing
Over" TV show are. (No, not Evelyn. I am talking about my
larger family.) This is the program in which Edward gets up and
tells members of the audience psychic knowledge he has of their
family and passes on messages from the departed.
Michael O'Neill, a marketing manager, gave an account in "Skeptic
Magazine" about his experience when he was an audience guest on
the program. The whole experience of filming the show is about
four hours long for members of the audience. There are two hours
of just sitting and waiting for things to start, then two hours of
the actual filming of the John Edward and the audience. Now a
two-hour setup time may not be unusual for a television show, but
it is very unusual that the audience has to sit there so long
before the actual filming. The audience is given nothing special
to do during this two hours so, of course, they talk among
themselves. And since they are going to see a program with a
famous psychic, they talk about the upcoming experience. They
speculate about what Edward might see in their own family. Hey,
Uncle Charlie just died; John Edward might see him. All the while
production assistants mill around doing various tasks. It is not
obvious that the audience is being spied upon, but there are all
sorts of possibilities. The seats could be bugged; the production
assistants could be collecting information; parts of the
audience could be monitored with long-distance listening
microphones, and there could be spies planted in the audience.
O'Neill said that about fifteen people arrived in one van, and did
not sit together in the audience, but scattered among other people.
The show is only thirty minutes on television. With introduction,
commercials, end credits, Edward may be shown in front of the
audience maybe twenty minutes a show. So why do they need two
hours of filming? Well, according to O'Neill the real magician is
the film editor. The session he saw filmed seemed to have far
more errors than correct guesses from Edward. But when you can
edit out 100 minutes of incorrect guesses you can make Edward seem
a lot better. O'Neill claimed that the editor even intentionally
falsified his exchanges with Edward, grafting in yes responses to
questions to which O'Neill had answered no.
In moments of stress, do you forget who is in your family? I
don't think I do. However, John Edward claims to think this is a
serious problem. In his rules for attendees at
he tells them "Don't get 'psychic
amnesia.' John coined this phrase to describe what happens when he
goes to someone in the audience and they all of a sudden forget
their family tree. Bring a copy of your family tree to the show,
just in case." Some percentage of the audience will finger these
family trees prior to the show, possibly while a production
assistant is setting up a microphone nearby. It is one more way
that Edward can get useful information.
Then there are simple standard tricks on playing the odds. For
example psychics know that a lot of male names start with the
letter 'J' and female names start with 'M'. Does someone here
have a father or brother whose name starts with "J"? Almost
certainly.
And don't forget that psychology is on the side of the psychic.
As a listener you are more interested in the right guesses. You
instantly forget many of the wrong guesses. The right guesses
take more discussion time and stand out in the listener's mind.
Getting a half hour program together is easy.
Interesting reading on a related subject is the anonymous essay at
entitled "My Nightmare Job as A PHONE
PSYCHIC." It gives you a little more information on the modus
operandi of the psychic help racket.
And now that we have used the word "psychic" dozens of times in
this article, almost certainly the ad that will be paired with
this issue will be for psychic help. Of course only people who
get the notice by email will see it. [-mrl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: X2 (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
CAPSULE: This second film based on the X-MEN comic book is a
better story and a more atmospheric production. I am told it is a
better adaptation of the comic book. One does not come to this
sort of film for a deep statement of the human condition, but for
a summer action film, it is not too bad. Rating: 7 (0 to 10), low
+2 (-4 to +4)
Sequels rarely capture the quality of the original story in a
series, though there are notable exceptions. FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE
was a better film than DR. NO with a more serious plot. Similarly
X2 really is better than the original X-MEN film from Fox released
in 2000. It still is not great, but it is better. The major
characters have already been introduced and the science fiction
war between mutants and humans is nearing and getting hotter.
Brian Cox, one of the great sinister actors of the screen, plays
General William Stryker, who believes that mutant humans put the
rest of us at risk. It is a reasonable assumption considering how
easily one mutant gets past the Secret Service and nearly kills
the President of the United States. Stryker has had dealings with
super-powered humans before and has his own plans for them,
deciding that it takes a mutant to catch a mutant. He makes no
distinction between Xavier's good mutants who want to be a
positive force and Magneto's bad mutants who have been seduced by
the Dark Side, so we essentially have a three-way fight.
Once again the leader of the good mutants and principal (and
principle) teacher at the Xavier school for promising mutants is
Dr. Xavier played by Patrick Stewart. His chief mutant nemesis is
Erik Lehnsherr (Ian McKellen), also known as Magneto. McKellen is
a great actor, and looks fine as a slightly evil mastermind.
Unfortunately he loses his aura and looks slightly embarrassed
when he puts on the helmet and cape of Magneto. The outfit makes
him look like an oversized chess piece. Early in the film Magneto
is not much of a threat since the government imprisoned him in the
last film. But the Government is starting its move against
mutants. On hand also are much of the same familiar team of
mutants from the first film. We have Hugh Jackman as Wolverine,
Halle Berry as Storm, Famke Janssen as Dr. Jean Grey, Anna Paquin
as Rogue, and James Marsden as Cyclops. Please don't ask me to
list their special powers. Suffice it to say they get nifty
powers that are just what they need in the right pinch, not unlike
James Bond's gadgets. New this film is the modest Nightcrawler
played by Alan Cumming who looks like a dark-blue-colored version
of a comic opera devil and who can teleport and leave behind
smoke. (Does this mean he gets lighter every time he teleports?
Where does the smoke come from?) The McGuffin this time is a sort
of magical board that can be used to locate and kill all mutants.
(How does it work?)
I have to say that in rating this film I have a little trouble
with the baroque varieties of mutant that nature seems to have
created. Most real mutants are not viable and do not pass on
their mutant genes. I am willing to accept the level of mutation
we see in SCANNERS where, if I remember correctly, it is one drug
that causes the mutation. These grotesque mutations we see in the
X-MEN films are as absurd as the wirework acrobatics. For me they
hurt the credibility of the film. Stil, I rate this mutant opus a
7 on the 0 to 10 scale and a low +2 on the -4 to +4 scale. Two
additional points: Contrary to what the film says, Neanderthals
did not interbreed and become our ancestors. See the abcnews.com
article at . And I hope that the
Skunkworks that designed the SR-71 Blackbird gets some sort of
royalty for the use of their design in films like this and THE
PHANTOM MENACE. [-mrl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: Why Taxes Need To Be High (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Whenever I review a film on the Internet based on a comic book I
get a lot more comment mail. After reviewing X2 I got this rather
flabbergasting statement in the mail:
"Just so you know, in regards to the Black Bird comment in your
review. The U.S. government designed the Black Bird long ago
(about in the 80s, might have been in the 60s) for the comic
book. Though while designing the jet (they were trying to make
it realistic) it was discovered that there was no oil available
which would work for such a large and fast jet, and so they
invented a new kind of oil never used before, which in theory
would work for the BlackBird jet. They now use that oil in all
American jets, and in honor of the X Men (who inspired its
creation) they named the oil 'Marvel Mystery Oil'. You can buy it
in your local auto parts store to this day.
And now you know, the rest of the story... Good day."
It is signed "daM rettaH" which might turn out to be appropriate.
I had no idea that the CIA was so fond of X-Men comic books.
The first flight of an SR-71 was on Dec. 22, 1964, by the way.
[-mrl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
This week we have a little bit of this and a little bit of that.
But first, I want to say that I misspoke myself last week when I
said that Ronald V. Borst's GRAVEN IMAGES had posters from films
through the 1990s--it goes up only through the 1960s. (That's
what comes of reviewing something you haven't quite finished yet!)
Theodore Roszak is better known to me as a fiction writer, with
his FLICKERS and the Tiptree-Award-winning MEMOIRS OF ELIZABETH
FRANKENSTEIN. (He is also known to me as a writer whose name is
hard to spell, since he uses "sz", while the composer Miklos Rozsa
uses "zs".) Anyway, I ran across a copy of Roszak's 1986 book THE
CULT OF INFORMATION, and skimmed through it. A lot of Roszak's
fears--the possible misuse of information, the tendency of some to
think everything can be solved by computers, and so on--have
certainly been borne out. And all the amazing artificial
intelligence accomplishments claimed at the time (fifteen years
ago) which were touted as five, or at most ten years, away have
not yet arrived.
But as with any older predictive book, there are a few statements
that catch one up as just *wrong" (in retrospect, anyway). For
example, talking about a plan Apple had to donate a computer to
every school in California, Roszak wrote, "As the market for home
computers sharply tapers off, . . . ." Well, if so, it was a
temporary lull. Also, he talks about various schools that
required the ownership of a computer for all students. (This was
often a specific one--at Dartmouth, it was a Macintosh, at
Clarkson, a Zenith.) Roszak finds this "a bold innovation,"
asking, "Has there ever been another instance of the universities
making the ownership of a piece of equipment mandatory for the
pursuit of learning?" Even if one doesn't include textbooks as
pieces of equipment, I suspect that engineering schools usually
required slide rules, and typewriters were usually de facto
required.
Of interest to all us technical types is Leonard Dr Vries's
VICTORIAN INVENTIONS. This book is even older than the Roszak,
having been published in 1972 by the American Heritage Press, but
since it is entirely about Victorian inventions, it hasn't become
any more outdated than it was. Some of these inventions
eventually succeeded. The most interesting to me was the red-
green eyeglass system for 3-D movies--although the version here
(1890) was for stereoscopic slides in a theater instead. There
was also an inner-spring mattress (1871), and a child's "Picture-
Book with Animal Noises" (1898), where the sounds are generated by
means of strings that the child can pull.
But others never came to fruition. In many cases, this was a good
thing. Consider the "Tricycle and Printing Press Combined"
(1895), which allowed one to compose "short advertisements" on the
tires such that (with the aid of the ink tank mounted on the
frame), "the advertisement [could be] printed on a clean
background to make it legible for a prolonged period of time."
Just what we need--an automated way to produce graffiti on the
roads! (Although the requirement that the surface be clean
probably would have made it unusable.)
There was also "A Spherical, Transparent Velocipede" (1884) which
apparently operated on a method similar to an acrobat progressing
on a ball, except that the operator is *inside* a hollow sphere
which contains some sort of ball-and-socket seat arrangement to
stabilize it. My favorite part, though, was what happens when the
sphere arrives at a river. "The sphero-velocipedist, propelling
his vehicle with the utmost possible speed, rolls down the back
with sufficient momentum to bring him to the other side of the
stream. For the sphere floats on the water and continues to
revolve until it has reached the opposite back." Even assuming it
would work this way--of which I am exceedingly skeptical--one has
to assume the sphere would actually arrive at the other side of
the river considerably downstream from where he started. And if
he misjudges the speed necessarily, he could easily end up
floating downstream all the way to the sea--or the next waterfall.
(I love the way the "river" changes to a "stream" in the
description.) Oh, the sphere is also described as being made up
of "some transparent, solid and not too fragile material." And
what, pray tell, would this have been in 1884?
I mentioned a few weeks ago (03/28/03) that I was reading Sir
Arthur C. Clarke's GREETINGS, CARBON-BASED BIPEDS! One selection
I just read was a speech that Clarke gave to the Smithsonian
Institution on April 24, 1990, for the Marconi Symposium.
Speaking of innovation, he said, "I'm even tempted to say that
large organizations not only can't make major innovations, but
shouldn't attempt to . . . . Of course, there are exceptions--see
for example Bell Labs and the transistor. . . . But Bell Labs
was deliberately set up to encourage creativity, not to
manufacture things."
How hath the mighty fallen! [-ecl]
===================================================================
Mark Leeper
mleeper@optonline.net
We are slaves of the laws in order that
we may be able to be free.
-- Cicero
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles.
No Late Fees & Free Shipping.
Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/YoVfrB/XP.FAA/uetFAA/J.MolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
mtvoid-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/