THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
11/13/09 -- Vol. 28, No. 20, Whole Number 1571
C3PO: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
R2D2: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
All material is copyrighted by author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent will be assumed authorized for inclusion
unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Topics:
Correction 1 (comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
Correction 2 (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Science Fiction Discussion Groups
Who Me? Celebrity of the Month? (comments
by Mark R. Leeper)
Was I Too Subtle? (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
The Impossible Dream (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
The Roquefort Files (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Time-Travel Books (letter of comment by Dan Kimmel)
Digital Conventions (letter of comment by Morris Keesan)
The Twilight Zone (letter of comment by Kip Williams)
This Week's Reading (GASLIGHT GRIMOIRE) (book comments
by Evelyn C. Leeper)
==================================================================
TOPIC: Correction 1 (comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
The emailed version of the MT VOID that went out last week was not
a draft version (as the Subject line indicated), but the actual
issue. [-ecl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Correction 2 (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
In the 02/15/08 issue of the MT VOID I talked about Kiva as a way
to lend (not contribute but lend) money to small businesses in the
developing countries. Kiva promoted itself as being contributors
giving low-interest loans to deserving small businesses.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mtvoid/message/356
It recently it has come to light that there is a middle man that is
a microfinance company. Kiva is still a very good institution, but
it is not exactly how it promoted itself.
The New York Times published the story November 8.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/business/global/09kiva.html
In the interest of honesty I just wanted you to know. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Science Fiction Discussion Groups
November 19: THE HITCHHIKER'S GUIDE TO THE GALAXY, Old Bridge (NJ)
Public Library, 7PM (note that this is the *third* Thursday
This month, rather than the fourth)
December 10: TBD, Middletown (NJ) Public Library, film at 5:30PM,
discussion of film and book after film
==================================================================
TOPIC: Who Me? Celebrity of the Month? (comments by Mark
R. Leeper)
Occasionally one is really surprised by the reach of the Internet.
I review films and post the reviews in public, but rarely think
about just how public that is. A website from Puna in Gujarat,
India has a monthly Celebrity of the Month. I had never heard of
the Okiedoks site when they approached me and asked me to be a
Celebrity of the Month. Well, November is my month and I am its
celebrity. I am still honored and shocked. You can see the site
at
http://okiedoks.com/viewarticleslist.aspx?catid=4.
Aw, shucks. Just my luck that November has only 30 days. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Was I Too Subtle? (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
I think my joke may have been overly subtle a couple of issues
back. I got a question from a reader who did not recognize that it
was a joke. After claiming that I slept only four hours a night
and saying my mathematics abilities were returning, I listed a
schedule of four two-hour naps per day. That would not be four
hours of sleep but eight. Oh, well. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: The Impossible Dream (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
They were asking on the Planet Money Podcast if you could have
anybody's healthcare system anywhere in the world, whose would
you choose. The answer that comes to mind for me is that of
Shangri-La. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: The Roquefort Files (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
People really do not learn from the past. They make the same
mistakes over and over.
I understand that people from the Champagne region in the northeast
of France have a complaint. They sell Champagne sparkling white
wine. Their white wine is world-famous as the right wine for
celebrating all sorts of occasions like weddings, Bar Mitzvahs, the
birth of children, winning pennants, etc. etc. etc. This creates a
real demand for Champagne, the wine. And what you get is other
places that make their own sparkling white wines also call their
wines Champagne. Now that makes the grape growers of Champagne
region angry. It is cutting into their sales. They insist that
Champagne is not a generic name for sparkling white wine, it is
their own wine and no other. No I don't have a strong feeling
about this. As Dracula says in the movie, "I never drink... wine."
But still this complaint has a familiar ring.
I was ordering lunch in a restaurant.
The waitress asked, "What kind dressing on the salad?"
"Do you have Roquefort?"
"No. I never heard of it."
"Do you have blue cheese dressing?"
"Sure, that we have."
"Roquefort is blue cheese dressing."
"Never heard that."
"Do you know where Roquefort is?"
"It's a place? Canada, I guess."
There was a time that when you wanted blue cheese dressing you
called it "Roquefort". That was what you called blue cheese
dressing. The only really authentic Roquefort dressing was made
with blue cheese from Roquefort-sur-Soulzon in the South of France.
Other people made Roquefort dressing, but it was not made with real
Roquefort blue cheese. The people who made Roquefort blue cheese
protested. The only true Roquefort salad dressing uses real blue
cheese from Roquefort. The others are frauds. So people stopped
calling Blue Cheese Dressing by the name Roquefort dressing and
instead just called it "blue cheese dressing". It was a more
descriptive name, anyway. Roquefort-sur-Soulzon still makes a blue
cheese that has some recognition among cheese connoisseurs. But if
you are under twenty-five you probably have never heard of
Roquefort, the place. It is not a good thing when your product's
name becomes the generic name for all things similar to your
product. But it is probably even worse to claim you own the name
and no one else can use it. That is betting that you can keep your
name in front of the public and that they will remember it.
It may not seem like the same thing could ever happen to Champagne.
After all Champagne is famous. It is the name that people look for
in a sparkling white wine. But there was also a time that a lot of
people knew the name Roquefort.
The cheese makers of Roquefort-sur-Soulzon might have done well to
remember that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. It also
can be good business. The Champagne grape growers might do better
to let some other wines be called Champagne and take it as a
compliment. After all, imitation is the sincerest form of
flattery.
Incidentally, Roquefort cheese's problems are not entirely of their
own making. The cheese was the center or perhaps victim of a
diplomatic crisis the first half of this year that might have
nearly removed the cheese from this country altogether. In recent
years all of the United States purchased only about 45% of the
Roquefort cheese Spain alone was purchasing. Here Roquefort cheese
just has a tiny market, in part because of poor name recognition.
Part of this is not the fault of the Roquefort-sur-Soulzon cheese
industry.
Inspired by the fears of Mad Cow disease and hormone treated cattle
the French government put restrictions on American beef. The Bush
administration favored the cattle interests (always), and early
this year that Administration announced that the tariff on
Roquefort cheese would be raised to a whopping 300%. This is way
out of line with other United States tariffs on French goods. That
would probably have raised the price of the cheese to $100 a pound,
but it was a visible sign of the government's displeasure with the
French restrictions on beef. Why the Roquefort cheese was selected
out by the Bush administration I don't know, but perhaps they
thought it was still respected by the French and most Americans had
forgotten about it so it was vulnerable. Imposing the tariff was
basically the administration saying that the United States would no
longer be a market for Roquefort cheese. In May the new Obama
administration removed the new punitive tariff. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Time-Travel Books (letter of comment by Dan Kimmel)
In response to Linda Buckley-Archer's list of favorite time-travel
books in the 11/06/09 issue of the MT VOID, Dan Kimmel writes:
As with any list, it's the personal picks at a given time, and not
the final word on the subject.
That said, I see several serious oversights. I'll mention three.
In terms of novels, Jack Finney's TIME AND AGAIN is one of the
great time travel stories. As for short stories, there are two
that are on opposite ends of the spectrum but are absolutely
crucial to understanding the sub-genre. One is Ray Bradbury's "The
Sound of Thunder", where stepping on a butterfly in prehistoric
times can completely change the world of the future. The other is
Alfred Bester's "The Men Who Murdered Mohammad", where mass murder
in the past doesn't change the present--except for the narrator--at
all.
I'd say these are among the essential time travel stories, and
wonder if Ms. Buckley-Archer had a different agenda in making her
selections.
[-dk]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Digital Conventions (letter of comment by Morris Keesan)
In response to Mark's comments on digital science fiction
conventions in the 10/16/09 issue of the MT VOID, Morris Keesan
writes, "Regarding the recent suggestion for holding conventions on
line: the mystery fans have gotten there before us:
http://ppwebcon.com/. I found out about this (after the fact,
alas) from the website of mystery (and occasional SF) writer Laurie
R. King. I was amused to see her quoting fellow panel member Lee
Child's assertion that "crime fiction is the boat, and literary
writers are but the barnacles on the boat's sides, along for the
ride," because of similar claims I've heard about SF." [-mk]
Mark replies, "But that is always the way. Mass appeal brings in
more money than art. Too often the boat decides that the barnacles
are too much of a drag." [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: The Twilight Zone (letter of comment by Kip Williams)
In response to Mark's comments on "The Twilight Zone" in the
11/06/09 issue of the MT VOID, Kip Williams writes:
For me, "Twilight Zone" was less of a media program than written
fiction, because at the time I was interested in it, the show just
wasn't available, and I learned many of the stories from reading
the paperback versions. Then a local station started showing a
somewhat limited (it seems in retrospect) subset of episodes in
rotation.
I don't know how I'd feel now--I do see some episodes from time to
time, but not regularly--but I may have preferred the text versions
at that point, though I was glad to see at least some of my
favorites on the screen at last.
I wouldn't mind if those book versions were made available again.
For that matter, another "book version of a TV show" I'd like to
see again would be the stories Robert Arthur wrote on behalf of
Alfred Hitchcock in the collections intended for somewhat
intermediate audiences, not quite young adult. They were of a
whimsical fantasy bent and were often standouts in their volumes.
Arthur's work on the "Three Investigators" also stood out over
later hands who continued the series after the first few books.
[-kw]
==================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
GASLIGHT GRIMOIRE: FANTASTIC TALES OF SHERLOCK HOLMES edited by
J. R. Campbell and Charles Prepolec (ISBN-13 978-1-894063-17-3,
ISBN-10 1-894063-17-1) is yet another collection of supernatural
Sherlock Holmes stories. I have to admit that I was put off by the
Foreword, in which David Stuart Davies lists several earlier
volumes of this sort, such as SHADOWS OVER BAKER STREET, GHOSTS OF
BAKER STREET, and THE ITALIAN SECRETARY (by Caleb Carr). But then
he pooh-poohs these, by saying, "However in general these stories
were penned by writers who, for want of a better expression, were
having a go at a Holmes tale unlike the authors featured in this
volume who are very well-versed in the world of Sherlock Holmes and
Doctor Watson and so can effectively blend the world of Baker
Street with the world of the unknown." Well, la-di-dah.
Well-versed in Holmsiana they may be (and I am not convinced of
that), but the fact is that the stories in SHADOWS OVER BAKER
STREET and GHOSTS OF BAKER STREET are better (or at least more
enjoyable) stories. Interestingly, Smith does not mention that the
majority of the stories in GHOSTS OF BAKER STREET actually have
rational explanations.
One problem with this volume is that so many of the stories depend
on familiarity with other works of fiction. In GASLIGHT GRIMOIRE
we have "The Lost Boy" by Barbara Hambly, which is somewhat
dependent on a familiarity with (and interest in) "Peter Pan".
"The Things That Shall Come upon Them" by Barbara Roden depends on
M. R. James's "Casting the Runes" as well as a whole raft of works
with other famous detectives. (And though Roden may be well-versed
in Sherlock Holmes she seems to confuse Baroness Orczy's "Man in
the Corner" with Ernest Bramah's blind detective Max Carrados.)
"Sherlock Holmes in the Lost World" by Martin Powell draws on
another series by Doyle. "The Grantchester Grimoire" by Chico Kidd
and Rick Kennett involves Carnacki. And "Red Sunset" by Bob
Madison assumes knowledge of Raymond Chandler works, both Philip
Marlowe and the Continental Op. While it is true that other
supernatural Holmes stories draw on other literary characters, they
are usually better-known ones such as Dracula. (He shows up here
too.)
One reference I did enjoy (but again, was a bit obscure) was one to
Jorge Luis Borges's "Funes, His Memory" (a.k.a. "Funes, the
Memorious") in "Merridew of Abominable Memory" by Chris Roberson.
This pastiche centers around the idea of memory, and in it, Watson
tells Holmes of an obituary notice: "It is an obituary notice of an
Argentinean who, if the story is to be believed, was rather
remarkable. Ireneo Funes, dead at the age of twenty-one, is said
to have had a memory of such singular character that he could
recall anything to which it was exposed. Witnesses are quoted as
saying that he could recall each day of his life in such detail
that the recollection itself took an entre day simply to process."
My recommendation: the earlier "supernatural Holmes" anthologies
are better; stick with them. [-ecl]
==================================================================
Mark Leeper
mleeper@optonline.net
Old friends, like old wines, don't lose their flavor.
-- Yiddish proverb