THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
10/22/10 -- Vol. 29, No. 17, Whole Number 1620
Frick: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
Frack: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
All material is copyrighted by author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent will be assumed authorized for inclusion
unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Topics:
Pulp Irony (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Some Comments on Origami (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
WIRELESS by Charles Stross (book review by Joe Karpierz)
SHERLOCK HOLMES: A STUDY IN PINK (TV review by Rob Mitchell)
Science Fiction Predictions (letter of comment
by Frank R. Leisti)
Spiderman and Spinnerets (letter of comment
by Bill Higgins)
Quotation Attribution (letter of comment
from Peter Rubinstein)
Optical Illusions (letter of comment by Keith F. Lynch)
This Week's Reading (THE BODY SNATCHERS and GAMING THE VOTE)
(book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
==================================================================
TOPIC: Pulp Irony (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
In the last issue of the MT VOID we had a link to see several
hundred pulp magazine covers. It occurs to me that everything in
the pulp world is kind of topsy-turvy. In pulps is the only place
I know where "spicy" is a synonym for "tasteless". [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Some Comments on Origami (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
In early July there was a news story that researchers at Harvard
and MIT built origami robots that fold and unfold themselves into a
simple origami boat or as simple origami plane.
See http://www.sciencenewsblog.com/blog/706101.
I cannot imagine how this will translate into something practical,
but it shows how origami has penetrated the consciousness of people
in science and mathematics.
It occurs to me that as much as I like origami and am proud of the
many figures I have invented, I never have mentioned it in one of
my editorials. Probably the reason for that is that writing about
origami is like dancing about architecture, to paraphrase a famous
quote. Origami is very visual. An origami figure is only a wad of
paper if you cannot see it. So as interested as I am in origami, I
do not talk about it much in these editorials.
I have been a fan of the "Japanese" art of origami since I was six
years old (or younger). My start on origami was in making paper
airplanes. That seems to be fairly common since paper airplanes
seems to be the branch of origami that the greatest number of
people have experienced. Since I was interested in science
fiction, probably I got started making paper airplanes and thinking
of them as paper spaceships. Or I would see in the Sears catalog a
toy monorail. Okay, that is sort of futuristic so it appealed to
me. I decided I could make one of those out of a paper airplane,
attach a drinking straw and run a string through that, over the
stairway banister that I used as sort of a makeshift pulley, and
back to the airplane where I attached it. Pull on the string and
the "monorail" would rush to its destruction crashing into the
stairway banister. I guess it was heady stuff for the young
version
of me.
I think it fascinated me that with something as common as paper you
can do so much. Today we have friends and relatives who have
children. They seem to get rooms-full of store-bought toys. I
know two little girls who each have toys enough to fill up a room
or two. It seems to me that when I was their age I had a shelf in
the closet for toys and games and my brother had another closet
shelf. That was pretty much it. My toys were what I could fit on
my shelf. Kids just did not have a lot of toys in those days. My
parents did not supply us with that many. But we did have paper.
You can make a toy or game with paper and then throw it away. And
I don't know anybody who does not have a lot of paper in his/her
house. If nothing else, everybody gets a lot of junk mail that is
fine for origami. So you can get expensive papers from Japan and
spend a lot of money on the hobby, but you can also go very
cheaply. In fact, as economical hobbies go, it is only one step or
two above forming your mouth into an 'O' and making music by
flicking your throat.
Incidentally, you might note that I put the attribution "Japanese"
in quotes. Origami was probably not invented by the Japanese, even
though it has a Japanese name. "Oru" is Japanese for "to fold" and
"Kami" is paper. But the Japanese probably did not invent origami.
Like "ramen" noodles, origami was probably invented in China.
Somehow the Japanese just tacitly have been given the credit since
things just sound more impressive with a Japanese name. (Sudoku
seems to have been invented in the United States, but it also got a
Japanese name.) Depending on your definition, origami may even go
back to Biblical times.
In the 20th Century it was realized that origami is very closely
related to mathematics. Now, I knew that when I took geometry my
background in origami helped me to some extent. Certainly I
encountered concepts like parallel, perpendicular, and angle
bisector in origami well before they came up for me in geometry.
But origami has much more scope than as examples of simple
mathematics concepts. When you start applying mathematics and
computers to origami suddenly a whole new world opens to the
folder. You can start making figures that are not just abstract
geometrical versions that sort of look like animals. The figures
look very naturalistic and very much like the animals being folded.
What is
more, one man who folds them (physicist Robert Lang) has
also written a computer program that need only a description--a
tree diagram--of what the final figure must look like and it will
design an origami fold for it.
And as Lang points out, these folds have application in medicine,
in science, in space, and many more places. These are applications
where making something that has to be large and cumbersome on the
job can be made compact for transporting. For example, a stent
that may be used to enlarge clogged arteries and veins can be made
small and compact until it is in place, and then can be opened out.
The applications for things like space telescopes are obvious.
Lang did a particularly interesting TED Talk on the uses of
origami. It is worth seeing:
See: http://tinyurl.com/void-origami
[-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: WIRELESS by Charles Stross (copyright 2009, Ace Science
Fiction, $7.99, 318pp, ISBN 978-0-441-01893-2) (book review by Joe
Karpierz)
Those of you who read these reviews know that Charles Stross is one
of my favorite writers. I've read and reviewed a good number of
his books, including SINGULARITY SKY, IRON SUNRISE, SATURN's
CHILDREN, and the first few of the "Merchant Princes" series.
WIRELESS is the first book of shorter works of Stross's that I have
read, and I'll have to say that I'm completely impressed with the
collection.
WIRELESS contains stories of all three of the short variations:
short story, novelette, and novella, and while not all of them are
outstanding, there are no clunkers in the bunch.
I've heard it said that in any collection of shorter works, said
collection should start out with a killer and end with a killer. I
think this is exceptionally true of WIRELESS.
The book leads off with Missile Gap, a story of the Cold War in the
far future where the earth is flat--well, where humanity lives is
flat, anyway--and the concerns about the missile gap, the disparity
in weapons between the United States and the Soviet Union, is alive
and well. That idea in and of itself is a bit out of the ordinary
(but since when has anything Stross has ever written been
ordinary), but when the truth comes out at the end of the novella,
well, I think even the reader is a bit scared. Missile Gap won the
Locus Award for Best Novella.
And it should end with a killer, right? Well, it certainly does.
PALIMPSEST, awarded the Hugo for Best Novella recently at WorldCon
in Australia, is a terrific and complex time travel story that will
leave you wondering if the reality we're living in is real. I
haven't had a story knock me out like this in years. The idea of
the canvas of history being rewritten (hence the title)
intentionally in order to hide things is just mind boggling. What
comes to mind for me is the concept of software versions--you have
to keep digging deeper and deeper to find the original. This, my
friends, is a story worthy of a Hugo Award and what I truly mean
when I point at it and say "that's science fiction". This is good
stuff.
There are all sorts of good stuff in between. There's a story set
in the "Laundry" universe (sadly, the only set of books of Stross'
that I have yet to read) which are chronicled in THE ATROCITY
ARCHIVES, THE JENNIFER MORGUE, and the just-released THE FULLER
MEMORANDUM). This is a cool story. The story "A Colder War" is a
sort of cross between the Cold War and the Cthulu Mythos, with a
nasty twist that is once again of a frightening nature. "Unwirer"
was written in collaboration with Cory Doctorow, and chronicles the
tale of those folks battling the wired establishment. It was
written as a reaction to some of the proposed early Internet laws,
and gives the reader a glimpse of what the world could look like if
those laws had been passed. "MAXOS" is a hilarious (well, to me,
anyway) story of First Contact and what those aliens would say to
us. The stories "Rogue Farm", "Trunk and Disorderly", and
"Snowball's Chance" were the less stellar stories of the bunch. Of
the three, I could have done without "Snowball's Chance", but even
that was okay.
This is a nice collection of Stross' shorter works, and I highly
recommend it for fans of Stross or even for those folks who may
have soured on the short form for one reason or another. This is
short SF in the grand tradition, and I believe you'll enjoy it.
[-jak]
==================================================================
TOPIC: SHERLOCK HOLMES: A STUDY IN PINK (TV review by Rob Mitchell)
When it comes to matters Sherlockian, I have pretty high standards.
It's very rare for me to be favorably disposed to any treatment of
Sherlock Holmes outside of Sir Arthur's Canon, especially on either
the large or small screen. All too often, such productions invoke
the tropes of the original stories whole totally missing the spirit
of the Holmes, and his London, that Doyle portrayed. And don't get
me started on the numerous efforts to "modernize" Holmes by
bringing him into the present day...
Well, on second thought, maybe you could get me started. Thanks to
a friend, I've been able to watch a three-part mini-series the BBC
broadcast not long. "A Study in Pink" (the first of the three
cases in the series) will be broadcast Sunday, October 24, on PBS,
and I strongly recommend it.
Sherlock Holmes (Benedict Cumberbatch from ATONEMENT) isn't exactly
what I'd expect Holmes to look like, but I quickly got used to it
thanks to the masterful way he captures the gamut of the languid
ennui of a bored Holmes through the eager glee of chasing down a
particularly challenging case. His Watson (Martin Freeman from HOT
FUZZ and the British THE OFFICE) is equally well portrayed--clearly
not stupid; trying hard to keep with Holmes' thoughts while
providing the necessary emotional and morale counterweight to
Holmes almost sociopathic fixation on solving crimes.
The series starts with Dr. John Watson in London having been
discharged from the British Army after being wounded in
Afghanistan. Bored and depressed, he drops in on a former
classmate who teaches at St. Barts Hospital, and in the course of
the conversation mentions gets introduced to another loner who
needs a flatmate--Sherlock, of course. These first few minutes set
the precedent for the rest of the series--an updating of certain
scenes or concepts from the original stories, brought into the
modern world where the internet, cell phone cameras, and GPS exist
and are used by the police, the criminals, and of course, our
heroes. Inspector Lestrade, Mycroft Holmes, Professor Moriarty,
even a modern-day (and plausible!) version of the Baker Street
Irregulars--all are brought into stories that are new and creative,
not merely retelling of the original stories with a 2010 wrapper.
I started watching this series fully expecting not to finish it--
disappointed like I've so often been. I was wrong, and I hope to
see further productions like these from the BBC. [-rm]
[The other two parts--"The Blind Banker" and "The Great Game"--will
be broadcast on successive Sundays. -ecl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Science Fiction Predictions (letter of comment by Frank R.
Leisti)
In response to the URL for an article on science fiction
predictions in the 10/08/10 issue of the MT VOID, Frank R. Leisti
writes:
Your recent MT VOID directed users to a website that described
science fiction predictions that have come true. Using this as a
wedge, I was wondering about the ideas present in earlier science
fiction works that are renewed in more recent science fiction
material.
To this end, with the recent movie of AVATAR, I recalled a
science fiction story that I had read about a handicapped person
using equipment to animate a life form that was created to live on
the surface of Jupiter. The story was entitled "Call Me Joe" by
Poul Anderson and I had read it when I was much younger, from my
father's library collection. It was contained in THE BEST SCIENCE
FICTION STORIES AND NOVELS (NINTH SERIES), edited by T. E. Dikty.
The story dealt with Edward Anglesey and his efforts at setting
up a base camp on the surface of Jupiter. When his connection gets
terminated, he takes off his helmet from his esprojector in time to
see the K-tub oscillating again to failure. The story line gives
Edward his motivation as the "man in the electric wheel chair"
upset with the current status with his ability to get things done
on the surface of Jupiter. We are then introduced to Jan Cornelius
who has to check the person and equipment coming from Earth's
Psionics Corporation. The pseudojovian is controlled by this
device when Edward uses the equipment even though he wasn't a
"formally trained esman at all." The story continues with
developments both on Jupiter and on Jupiter V coming to
its conclusion with the directive of having more pseudojovians sent
down to help this first Jovian build a base and start a
civilization (females were introduced as well as more males.)
I see the interesting ties with James Cameron's AVATAR and
wonder how many science fiction stories are influenced by prior
stories, some of which might have been read so long ago that just
the nugget of ideas are reused and expanded upon with new stories.
As an aside note, the book also presents "The Science-Fiction Book
Index" complied by Earl Kemp. As described in the book, "The Index
that follows covers in detail the fiction titles published in the
field of imaginative literature, in the English language. There
are three lists, Number One: Books published between January 1,
1956, and December 31, 1956; Number Two: Books published between
January 1, 1957, and December 31, 1957; Number Three: Related,
Associational and Non-fiction Works."
It was interesting to note the prices of these books ranging
from 35 cents to $4.95. There were other prices in the old British
format shown as 12s6d. [-frl]
Mark replies:
You are probably right that AVATAR to some extent used ideas from
"Call Me Joe". That is sort of allowed in science fiction (unless
Harlan Ellison is involved). Stories comment on other stories and
ideas shift around. If you take a look at
http://tinyurl.com/call-me-joe-avatar you will see that a lot of
people noticed the similarity. Interesting that "Call Me Joe" has
much of its plot on the surface of Jupiter. There is no surface of
Jupiter, but I wonder if that was known when Anderson was writing.
[-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Spiderman and Spinnerets (letter of comment by Bill Higgins)
In response to Mark's review of SPIDERMAN in the 05/10/02 issue of
the MT VOID, Bill Higgins writes:
In your review of *Spiderman* (*THE MT VOID* 05/10/02--Vol. 20,
No. 45) you wrote words that have stayed with me:
"Parker is very sick for a few hours, but when he recovers he gets
considerably better than just well. He finds he has the power to
shoot webs from his wrists. (Why would he develop this at his
wrists? I suppose it would be a very different film if he had
inherited spinnerets in the same anatomical location where a spider
has them.)"
I feel I must report that on last week's episode of "The Venture
Brothers"-- an animated show that, like many another these days, is
darn funny if one can put up with its vulgarity-- featured a web-
swinging Manhattan superhero, who got his powers from experiments
with radioactive spiders, whose spinnerets match your description.
He is unnamed in the dialogue, but without rewinding to check the
credits, I think he is referred to as The Brown Recluse.
This series is unafraid to explore such logical possibilities.
For reference, the episode was "Bright Lights, Dean City", [and]
aired 10 October 2010.
Mark responds, "Score one for realism in television. This is the
real reality TV." [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Quotation Attribution (letter of comment from Peter
Rubinstein)
In response to the quotation at the end of the 10/15/10 issue of
the MT VOID ("That I could clamber to the frozen moon and draw the
ladder after me."), Peter Rubinstein writes that this should be
attributed to Arthur Schopenhauer, rather than "author unknown".
==================================================================
TOPIC: Optical Illusions (letter of comment by Keith F. Lynch)
In response to comments on optical illusions in the 10/08/10 issue
of the MT VOID, Keith F. Lynch writes, "What's really disturbing is
the aftereffects of staring at a smooth-scrolling terminal for
hours. It will feel like the building you're in is sinking. And
it's a very powerful sensation. I wasn't the only one who had to
take breaks staring out a window to see that the building isn't
really sinking." [-kfl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
THE BODY SNATCHERS (a.k.a. INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS) by Jack
Finney (ISBN 978-0-684-85258-4) was the book chosen for the SF-
book-and-movie group this month, with the 1956 movie INVASION OF
THE BODY SNATCHERS. There are actually four film versions of the
book: INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS (1956), INVASION OF THE BODY
SNATCHERS (1978), BODY SNATCHERS (1993), and THE INVASION (2007).
The first is the most accurate to the book--more accurate than most
film versions of books. What is missing from the film, however,
are most of the sections that give you a sense of the internal
thoughts and emotions of the main character (Miles Bennell), and
also some of the descriptive passages. For example, there is a
long section where Miles is walking through the town and notices
that stores are closed, that no one is painting their house, and so
on. There is a bit of this in the movie, but not as much.
(Actually, the description sounds like a lot of the "Rust Belt"
towns hard hit by the recession.)
I also read GAMING THE VOTE: WHY ELECTIONS AREN'T FAIR (AND WHAT WE
CAN DO ABOUT IT) by William Poundstone (ISBN 978-0-809-04892-2).
Many people know about Arrow's Theorem, which proves that given a
set of "self-evident" rules, it is impossible to devise a ranked
voting system (a.k.a. preferential voting system) that follows all
the rules. Briefly, it states:
General Possibility Theorem: It is impossible to formulate a social
preference ordering that satisfies all of the following conditions:
1. Nondictatorship: The preferences of an individual should not
become the group ranking without considering the preferences
of others.
2. Individual Sovereignty: each individual should be able to
order the choices in any way and indicate ties
3. Unanimity: If every individual prefers one choice to another,
then the group ranking should do the same
4. Freedom From Irrelevant Alternatives: If a choice is removed,
then the others order should not change
5. Uniqueness of Group Rank: The method should yield the same
result whenever applied to a set of preferences. The group
ranking should be transitive.
In GAMING THE VOTE, Poundstone details all of the major variants of
ranked voting, and gives examples in each one of how this is true.
He also proposes a solution that does not have any of these flaws--
and not a brand-new one, but one that has been used on the Internet
in many applications for years now--range voting. (It does not
violate Arrow's Theorem, because it is not ranked voting.) [-ecl]
==================================================================
Mark Leeper
mleeper@optonline.net
The dignity of man lies in his ability to face
reality in all its meaninglessness.
-- Martin Esslin