THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
02/24/17 -- Vol. 35, No. 35, Whole Number 1951

Co-Editor: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
All material is copyrighted by author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for 
inclusion unless otherwise noted.

To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
The latest issue is at http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm.
An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at
http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm.

Topics:
        Science Fiction (and Other) Discussion Groups, Films, 
                Lectures, etc. (NJ)
        MT VOID Policy on Fiction
        My Picks for Turner Classic Movies for March (comments 
                by Mark R. Leeper)
        Near-Future SF (tweet by @Kosmogrrrl)
        THE SKILL OF OUR HANDS by Steven Brust and Skyler White 
                (book review by Dale L. Skran)
        BURLESQUE: THE HEART OF THE GLITTER TRIBE (film review 
                by Mark R. Leeper)
        LAVENDER (2017) (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
        VARNEY THE VAMPIRE (letters of comment by George Phillies 
                and John Purcell)
        WAY STATION (letters of comment by Philip Chee 
                and John Purcell)
        Superbugs and Project Blue (letter of comment by Philip Chee)
        Stigmata (fiction by David Rubin)
        This Week's Reading (INVISIBLE PLANETS: AN ANTHOLOGY OF 
                CONTEMPORARY CHINESE SF IN TRANSLATION) (book comments 
                by Evelyn C. Leeper)

===================================================================

TOPIC: Science Fiction (and Other) Discussion Groups, Films, 
Lectures, etc. (NJ)

March 9: SHADOW ON THE LAND (1968) & novel: IT CAN'T HAPPEN HERE
        by Sinclair Lewis, Middletown (NJ) Public Library, 5:30PM
        http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks03/0301001h.html
        audiobook: 
        audiobook: 
March 23: "Story of Your Life" by Ted Chiang, Old Bridge (NJ) 
        Public Library, 7PM
April 13: GROUNDHOG DAY (1993) and "Doubled and Redoubled" (short 
        story by Malcolm Jameson), Middletown (NJ) Public Library, 
        5:30PM (rescheduled from February)
May 11: THE THIRTEENTH FLOOR (1999) & SIMULACRON-3 by Daniel 
        F. Galouye, Middletown (NJ) Public Library, 5:30PM
        
        
May 25: REPLAY by Ken Grimwood, Old Bridge (NJ) Public Library, 7PM
July 27: THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF by David Gerrold, Old Bridge 
        (NJ) Public Library, 7PM
September 28: THE INVISIBLE LIBRARY by Genevieve Cogman, Old Bridge 
        (NJ) Public Library, 7PMNovember 16: THE FOREVER WAR by Joe 
        Haldeman, Old Bridge (NJ) Public Library, 7PM
January 25, 2018: OLD MAN'S WAR by John Scalzi, Old Bridge (NJ) 
        Public Library, 7PM

Northern New Jersey events are listed at:

http://www.sfsnnj.com/news.html

===================================================================

TOPIC: MT VOID Policy on Fiction

Up until now, we have avoided publishing fiction for a number of 
reasons, mostly because we are basically a non-fiction zine.  (Yes, 
I know that is circular reasoning.)  Also, fiction tends to be 
longer than the non-fiction reviews, essays, and so on that we do.  
(Yes, the longer non-fiction gets "serialized," but we are not 
going to serialize fiction.  However, now that flash fiction is 
becoming a "thing", we may on occasion include some flash fiction 
(defined as 1000 or fewer words).  We have a preference for the 
shorter forms: the Six-Word Story, twitterature (140 characters), 
the dribble (50 words), and the drabble (100 words).  [-ecl]

===================================================================

TOPIC: My Picks for Turner Classic Movies for March (comments by 
Mark R. Leeper)

Z, the very last film of "31 Days of Oscar", the series I discussed 
last month, is a very recommendable film.  The film is based on a 
true story.  The police and military in Greece was fanatically 
right wing and very repressive.  The left-wing opposition puts much 
of its hope for the future in a liberal and pacifist Deputy in the 
Greek government.  He is coming to town (Athens?) to speak at a 
rally for nuclear disarmament, and the police, in league with the 
military, are doing all they can to get in his way.  Then the 
Deputy is mortally injured in a traffic accident and dies shortly 
thereafter.  The police are supposed to be investigating the 
accident, but they do not want to be successful.  They are just as 
happy the Deputy is dead.  To save face the government sends as 
investigator an examining magistrate who they expect to be a puppet 
of his bosses.  But the magistrate refuses the let the government 
control him and investigates for himself this accident that may 
have been a murder.  The film is directed by Costa-Gavras who 
specialized in political films.  The story was adapted from the 
novel Z by Vassili Vassilikos.  The musical score by Mikis 
Theodorakis, who wrote the music for ZORBA THE GREEK, has become a 
classic.

Z will be the last film of the February not-so-mini-festival "31 
Days of Oscar", which just happens to extend to March.  Z will play 
4:00 AM on Saturday, March 4.

Back in 1973 I had a personal gripe. The best science fiction on 
television was on Saturday morning as an animated revival of "Star 
Trek".  The writing was not at all bad by writers like Larry Niven 
and David Gerrold--known science fiction authors.  But the 
animation was really weak.  It was very bad, pinchpenny, animated 
cartoon style.  If the Enterprise was flying through stars, the 
left side of the star field was a mirror image of the right side.  
I guess it was cheaper to animate that way.  The whole show was 
done in very limited animation.  I remember complaining at a party 
that they did not know how to use that medium.  Anything that the 
mind's eye could picture it should be cheap to show with animation.  
Disney knew that.  Why can't animated films show more visual 
imagination?  And almost as if it were aimed to prove my point a 
French-Czech feature-length film, FANTASTIC PLANET was released 
just about the same time.  On the Planet Ygam humans, called Oms, 
are domesticated to be pets for sixty-foot humanoid blue aliens 
called Draags.  Oms are to Draags a lot like mice are to humans.  
The animation is crudely done by current standards, but the alien 
flora and fauna are often witty and funny.  Some birds have 
umbrella-like wings.  The tiny humans meet in caves and plot to 
escape the giant Draags.

I assume most people reading this have a special interest in the 
Cinema of the Fantastic.  But with TCM having finished up its 31 
Days of Oscar, they had to decide what to do next.  I guess they 
decided to have a short remembrance of their programming last 
October.  I guess you could call it "32 Hours of Halloween".  
Starting Thursday, March 23 at 8:00 PM, and going to March 25 at 
4:00 AM they have 32 hours of (not particularly rare) fantasy 
films.


Thursday, March 23 
    8:00 PM GOJIRA (1954)
    10:00 PM KING KONG (1933)

Friday, March 24
    12:00 AM INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS (1956)
     1:30 AM THING FROM ANOTHER WORLD, THE (1951)
     3:15 AM X FROM OUTER SPACE, THE (1967)
     5:00 AM 20 MILLION MILES TO EARTH (1957)
     6:45 AM NOSFERATU (1922)
     8:45 AM CABINET OF DR. CALIGARI, THE (1920)
    10:30 AM WOLF MAN, THE (1941)
    12:00 PM CAT PEOPLE (1942)
     1:30 PM HORROR OF DRACULA (1958)
     3:15 PM FRANKENSTEIN (1931)
     4:45 PM MUMMY, THE (1932)
     6:15 PM GORGON, THE (1964)
     8:00 PM WIZARD OF OZ, THE (1939)

Saturday, March 25
    10:00 PM LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RETURN OF THE KING, THE (2003)
     1:30 AM CLOCKWORK ORANGE, A (1971)
     4:00 AM SOYLENT GREEN (1973)

Now as to what I think is the best film of the month, well, it may 
not be the best but it is good and a rare opportunity to see it.  
The film is SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET (1982).  
No, it is not the Johnny Depp version.  These were the actors of 
the stage production, especially George Hearn and Angela Lansbury.  
It has tremendous acting rather than digital effects.  That will be 
Tuesday, March 21 at 1:00 PM.

And noticing that brought my attention to another, shorter slate of 
fantasy films.  I wonder what's up.

Tuesday March 21
    4:00 AM WESTWORLD (1973)
    5:30 AM 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY (1968)
    8:00 AM DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE (1932)
    9:45 AM INVISIBLE MAN, THE (1933)
   11:00 AM M (1931)
    1:00 PM SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET (1982)

Enjoy!

[-mrl]

===================================================================

TOPIC: Near-Future SF (tweet by @Kosmogrrrl)

Charles S. Harris sends us this tweet from @Kosmogrrrl:

Increasingly impressed with anyone who manages to write near-future 
SF under these conditions

1. Suspect in North Korea killing 'thought she was taking part in 
TV prank'

2. Robert Mugabe could contest election as corpse, says wife

3. German parents told to destroy doll that can spy on children

...

6. Zealandia -- pieces finally falling together for continent we 
didn't know we had 

[Sorry for the abridgement; the tweet had a screen capture that did 
not capture the entire screen.  -ecl]

===================================================================

TOPIC: THE SKILL OF OUR HANDS by Steven Brust and Skyler White 
(book review by Dale L. Skran)

Quick review:  In spite of an intriguing premise, this book is not 
recommended.  In fact, it should be avoided.

I have long had a soft spot for Steven Brust after reading his 
first novel, TO REIGN IN HELL, in 1984.  I am not a Brust 
completist, but I have read most of the Vlad Taltos fantasy novels. 
Toward the end I felt Brust was running out of ideas, but I did 
read a lot of them.  When I saw he had started a new series co-
authored with Skyler White, a much less well-known fantasy writer, 
featuring "The Incrementalists" I bought HANDS, the second book in 
his new series.

The general idea is that for 40,000 years humanity has been guided 
by a small group of witches? superhumans? mutants? that have a 
shared memory and can pass that memory into new bodies.  They claim 
to have memories going back 40,000 years, but in HANDS the oldest 
character is only 2,000 years old.  This is surely an interesting 
idea, but it is dreadfully executed by Brust and White.  Among the 
many issues with HANDS are:  

- This is a set-piece propaganda story.  The good guys are liberal 
open-borders advocates and the bad guys are the worst sort of 
cardboard stereotype racist police and bigoted thugs.

- The writing style emphasizes conversation over description, with 
the result that the plot, limited though it may be, is hard to 
follow.

- HANDS feels like a short story padded out with an immense amount 
of dull conversation.

- The Incrementalists have supposedly lived for hundreds of years, 
but they talk and act like 60's activists with limited life 
experience.  Not a one of them is remotely plausible as a 
character.

- With characters this old, the reader might expect to get a lot of 
historical perspective.  However, with the exception of some 
flashbacks to the days John Brown, the abolitionist, there is no 
such historical knowledge on display.

- Much of HANDS seems incomprehensible, but now that I realize it 
is the second book in the series, this makes more sense.  HANDS 
desperately needs a summary of the first book so the reader has a 
clue who Celeste might be.

In short, HANDS is a significant step down for Brust. I felt his 
work in the Taltos series was declining, but HANDS represents a 
still further drop.  I pushed myself through the entire book on the 
theory that eventually it might improve, but it never did.  I have 
not read many books that dealt so superficially with the issues 
they purport to examine, or were so dull in the telling.

I'm not going to bother rating HANDS--I recommend it to no one but 
someone writing a thesis on propaganda fiction.  It ought to be 
compared to things like THE IRON HEEL (Jack London) and LEVEL 7 
(Mordecai Roshwald), but Jack London is a far better writer than 
Brust/White, and at least LEVEL 7 had a real message that is hard 
to dispute--nuclear war is a bad idea.  Another comparison is to 
the various Jerry Pournelle novels from the 70s that were suffused 
with right-wing, even monarchist, political views.  Alas for 
Brust/White, Pournelle at least was capable of telling (for the 
most part, anyway!) an entertaining story to wrap his politics in.  
[-dls] 

===================================================================

TOPIC: BURLESQUE: THE HEART OF THE GLITTER TRIBE (film review by 
Mark R. Leeper)

CAPSULE: A company of performers revives the fun and slightly 
naughty atmosphere of the old burlesque that died about 1940.  
Theirs is a neo-Burlesque that is having a healthy revitalization.  
They create, work hard, and have what appears to be one heck of a 
good time.  Jon Manning directs a film of interviews of people 
involved with the show. Rating: +2 (-4 to +4) or 7/10

I have to admit that when this film came along I was unaware that 
there was still Burlesque alive in the 21st century.  For those who 
don't know it is a lot like vaudeville, a live stage variety show, 
generally with skimpy costumes and a strong sexual accent including 
striptease performances.  The original Burlesque came to the US 
about the time of the close of the Civil War.  It supposedly died 
out about the time of World War II.  But the people in this film 
are among those who have revived it as a sort of neo-Burlesque.

(As I see the film BURLESQUE: THE HEART OF THE GLITTER TRIBE I see 
that there is something of a revival.  My wife put "New Jersey 
Burlesque" into a search engine and discovered that tomorrow there 
is to be a New Jersey Burlesque Festival not far away from where I 
am writing.  OK, so I suppose that is evidence along with this film 
that burlesque still lives.)

I think this film could do a better job of explaining itself, but I 
guess the Glitter Tribe is this particular company of Burlesque 
performers.  People involved with the show talk about just about 
anything, but as far as the film is concerned no real names are 
ever used.  You identify people like, "oh yes, she is the one who 
works all night on her costumes."

We get to see some of their acts and in between there are 
interviews with the performers talking about life, sex, what their 
families think of their chosen profession, and the excruciating 
hours working all day and preparing their acts all night.  Some of 
the acts are really creative.  One woman loves eating burritos, 
eating them every day.  Her idea for an act was to come out of a 
six-foot brown paper sack, wrapped in a human-size cloth tortilla 
and then again in aluminum foil, like a burrito packed to go.  She 
works her way down to the filling, which turns out to be the very 
scantily dressed performer herself with a cloth jalapeno covering 
the parts to keep the act legal.

I guess that takes me to the nudity.  It either would not be a true 
revival of Burlesque or a very bad documentary if there were not a 
lot of backstage nudity.  Except for what we see in the 
performances themselves, nothing is intended to be very erotic.  
The performers seem to like the idea that they are doing something 
that they like and can put their entire selves into.  Though some 
have had very painful backgrounds they are dedicated to this 
regimen.

This is a light and lively documentary that turns into a surprising 
pleasure.  I rate it a +2 on the -4 to +4 scale or 7/10.  
BURLESQUE: HEART OF THE GLITTER TRIBE will open in select theaters 
March 3rd and on VOD/iTunes March 7th.

Film Credits:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6296208/combined

What others are saying:
http://tinyurl.com/void-rt-burlesque

[-mrl]

===================================================================

TOPIC: LAVENDER (2017) (film review by Mark R. Leeper)

Warning: Spoiler at the end of this review

CAPSULE: An amnesiac has a spectacular car accident that shakes 
loose some hidden memories of her younger self.  Obsessively trying 
to piece together her past, she goes to live at the farmhouse of 
her youth.  Canadian director Ed Gass-Donnelly co-writes and 
directs this mysterious melodrama involving a woman passing into a 
strange world of repressed memories and perhaps the supernatural.  
LAVENDER would have made a good 1970s TV-movie or a just-okay 
current theatrical film.  This is more an exercise in suspense than 
one of logic.  And it satisfies neither suspense nor logic.  Horror 
film fans who do not suffer from amnesia will have seen much of the 
film's content before.  Rating: low +1 (-4 to +4) or 5/10

Abbie Cornish plays Jane, a woman who remembers only parts of her 
youth, and who is fixated on the past.  She likes to take pictures 
of old abandoned farmhouses to try to recreate a feel for earlier 
days.  But when she is almost killed in a car crash she starts 
seeing visions of her own forgotten past--images she might have 
preferred to forget.  She discovers her parents and sister were 
murdered in a massacre reminiscent of IN COLD BLOOD.  And now Jane 
is starting to remember her nightmarish history.  She discovers 
that a farmhouse she photographed and which had fascinated her had 
been her original home.

There are indeed creepy things going on in the old house.  And 
someone is leaving her small wrapped gifts that are artifacts of 
her past.  Ed Gass-Donnelly, who co-authored the script and 
directed, has tried to foster suspense by having Jane have slow 
explorations of the house, never finding a lot important.  That is 
one problem for the viewer.  He is put through a lot of suspenseful 
scenes but makes little progress toward solving the central riddle.  
And the riddle is never completely solved.  What is solved is only 
what is suspected anyway.

There is cinematic homage to THE SHINING.  Jane's daughter Alice 
seems to have an invisible imaginary friend who talks to her about 
her mother, much as Tony talked to Danny in the Kubrick film.  Also 
while THE SHINING had its topiary maze, LAVENDER has the main 
character hysterical in maze built of bales of straw.  (Don't 
people in horror films know there are simple strategies like the 
right-handed rule to avoid getting lost in a maze?)

The farmhouse was subtle.  It does not scream "haunted!" the way 
Eel Marsh House did in THE WOMAN IN BLACK.  The film manages a 
little bit of atmosphere, but the story is too predictable and not 
enough original.  I would rate LAVENDER a low +1 on the -4 to +4 
scale or 5/10.  LAVENDER will be released to theaters, VOD and 
digital HD on March 3. 2016

Film Credits:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4680980/combined

What others are saying:


SPOILER AHEAD: If you want to know how things are going to turn out 
in the plot, notice the film stars Abbie Cornish, Dermot Mulroney, 
and some lesser-known actors.

[-mrl]

===================================================================

TOPIC:  VARNEY THE VAMPIRE (letters of comment by George Phillies 
and John Purcell)

In response to Evelyn's review of VARNEY THE VAMPIRE in the 
02/17/17 issue of the MT VOID, George Phillies writes:

Thank you for the heroic deed of reading VARNEY THE VAMPIRE.  Was 
he actually a vampire?   [-gp]

Evelyn responds:

Yes.  [-ecl]

John Purcell writes:

I don't believe it.  Evelyn not only read VARNEY THE VAMPYRE, but 
also reviewed it back in 1987.  Well, I suppose every thirty years 
this novel should be resurrected.  It will probably take the next 
reviewer thirty years to recover and read that damned novel, 
anyway.  Oh, by the way, I'm already approaching page 100.  Only 
1063 pages to go in the 2004 Wordsworth Edition I own.  [-jp]

===================================================================

TOPIC: WAY STATION (letters of comment by Philip Chee and John 
Purcell)

In response to Joe Karpeirz's review of WAY STATION in the 02/17/17 
issue of the MT VOID, Philip Chee writes:

I've been thinking.  Petticoat Junction has a rail spur that goes 
from nowhere to nowhere because some time back the connection to 
the greater rail network was disconnected.  On the other hand this 
might be deliberate.  What if Petticoat Junction was a WAY STATION 
to a galactic rail network?

For example, over the course of the show, each of the sisters had 
been portrayed by several different actresses.  But none of the 
characters apparently notices the changing faces.  Perhaps this is 
just BRITISH<<<<<<< GALACTIC RAIL rotating their staff? [-pc] just BRITISH<<<<<<< GALACTIC RAIL rotating their staff? [-pc] [The '<'s represent backspacing. -ecl] John Purcell writes: Great review of Clifford D. Simak's WAY STATION, one of my favorite books he wrote. It definitely deserved the Hugo Award. I had the pleasure of meeting Cliff quite a few times when I lived in Minneapolis and attended Minicon every single year, where Simak was a constant presence. Him and Gordon R. Dickson, that is. I treasure those memories. [-jp] =================================================================== TOPIC: Superbugs and Project Blue (letter of comment by Philip Chee) In response to Mark's comments that microbes resistant to antibiotics will survive better and reproduce in the 02/17/17 issue of the MT VOID, Philip Chee writes: Not only that. Horizontal gene transfer means antibiotic resistance can jump to other species of microbes like lightning. [-pc] In response to Greg Frederick's comments on Project Blue being able to directly image planets in the Alpha Centauri system in the same issue, Philip writes: Can't the JWST [James Webb Space telescope] do that anyway? [-pc] =================================================================== TOPIC: Stigmata (fiction by David Rubin) Stigmata It started simply. In a Delaware public school, in September 2013, the principal walked into the lunch room and told the students that no one would eat before prayers, and called a student to the podium. The student began, "In the name of Jesus..." Yusef, the Jewish child raised his hand. "That's not the brucha we use at home. We don't pray to Jesus." The principal replied, "That's what you do at home. Your public school is in America, a Christian nation, so you do it our way or you can go to the side room there and do it your way." Yusef got up and went to that back room, He found a small room, probably used as a closet before now pretty much empty, with nothing in the room but a cross pasted up. He realized he couldn't do the prayer for the loaf or the wine. He didn't have either. He had a bad habit. Whenever he got especially nervous or upset, he started to scratch, even though there were times that he scratched himself raw and got infections. He scratched his head now, prayed in Hebrew, then went back to his seat, next to his classmates. His friend Chuck asked him why he couldn't pray like everybody else. "You know I'm Jewish", he said. We don't pray to Jesus. "Then who do you pray to?" Before he could answer, another classmate said, "Jews don't pray to anybody. They're atheists, like Marx and Lenin." "We do believe in God. We just don't pray to Jesus" "My priest says that the only way to the father is through the son, so if you don't believe in Jesus, you don't believe in God." "So does my pastor!" another boy said. "My rabbi says that only God is God and all this Trinity stuff is a way of worshipping a false god?" "Are you saying Jesus is a false God?" Then it started. He hoped he imagined the words, Jew boy. As he sat, he felt the redness where he scratched and resisted the urge to scratch some more. At three, he came home, kissed the mazuza and his mother. "How was school?" his mother asked. "We prayed today, at lunch. Isn't that illegal in a modern public school? Doesn't that defy separation of church and state?" "Some atheists made it that way. We all know that the Constitution permits freedom of religion and all this talk of separation of church and state can't stop it. You'll be happy to know I and your father are working on that. We already got the principal to agree to it, so think of us, as you pray at lunch." "But it didn't feel right, Mom. I tried to do the prayer the way the rabbi taught me to, but I only ended up scratching." "We warned you about scratching like that. Remember when scratched so much your skin got so red and infected we had to take you to the hospital?" "Yeah, Mom. But it's hard to be the praying Jew." "Your classmates know you're a pious Jew. Now as the prayers make them more pious, you'll have an easier time." "Yes, Mom." The next day, he head the whispers he hoped weren't and tried not to look around as he walked. "HEY, JEW BOY!" He heard it loud and clear, this time, as it was yelled into his right ear. He looked right, and someone pulled on his left payis, the long sideburns orthodox Jews keep. "OWW!" he shouted, and felt his head pulled to the left, as someone on his right pulled off his yarmulka. He never saw it again. In class, he started scratching his head, but pulled his hands down and started to scratch his palms and wrists, stopping when he noticed they were getting red. At lunch he sat for a moment when he heard the principal call for the prayer. "But you, Yusef, may go to your room." He heard the other students laugh as he went to his little closet. The cross was gone. Its place was the word, "Jewish place", written with thick marker, and a bible on a table. "Christian Bible, of course", he thought. "Well, this time, I have my bread and wine." He went into his backpack to find his can of grape juice had been opened and spilled. He found his kosher salami sandwich, but a container of milk had been added, leaving the meal unkosher. He left the room and went back to his seat. "How was your meal?", someone yelled. Several students laughed. He began to cry to himself and didn't even try to stop himself from scratching. The next day, he came in, staying close to the wall, holding his backpack close to his chest. Someone tried to grab his payis, but he had taped them down. He kept his yamulka in his backpack until he got to class. "Today will be different", he thought. Lunch came and he was surprised to see his mother there. "Since I helped establish the prayers, I have the privilege of watching you lead the lunch prayer", she said. Lunch time came, and he stood in front of the room, with his mother on one side of him and the principal on the other. He had a full, freshly baked loaf with a real knife and real bottle of wine in front of him. He opened to the correct page of what this time was a Jewish prayer book, when a note fell out. He picked it up and it was a computer printed page full of nothing but the word Jew boy, repeated over and over. He started to cry and scratched himself all over, especially his head, his hands, his feet, and even his side. All those spots began to bleed, so the teachers picked him up and took him out."Wilmington or St Francis hospital?" the secretary asked "Delaware Psychiatric, and call his psychiatrist. He's had a nervous breakdown." I'm calling a lawyer, and you can bet the papers are going to hear about this!" his mother yelled. Next week, he returns with his mother, his father, his principal and a cop, to pick up his things, for the last time. They pass through a crowd of students. "Not a word", the principal says, but a few grow close, with tears in their eyes. "I'm so sorry we did this to you" one says. "Where can I get a yamulka?" "How do I grow payis?" "Can I join your shul?" The principal says, "I can understand your apologies, but why do so many of you want to convert? Isn't that a bit much?" A student pulls out a newspaper. The headline says "SCHOOL HAS NEW SAINT, JEWISH BOY HAS STIGMATA" [-dr] =================================================================== TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper) INVISIBLE PLANETS: AN ANTHOLOGY OF CONTEMPORARY CHINESE SF IN TRANSLATION edited and translated by Ken Liu (ISBN 978-0-7653-8419- 5) includes thirteen stories by seven authors, as well as three essays on Chinese science fiction. The two authors probably most familiar to Western readers would be Liu Cixin and Hao Jingfang (or alternatively, Cixin Liu and Jingfang Hao). Liu (no relation to Ken Liu) won a Hugo for his novel THE THREE-BODY PROBLEM, and this volume has a self-contained excerpt from it. Hao also won a Hugo, for his short story "Folding Beijing", which is also included here. Ken Liu has attempted to include stories showing a range of approaches and styles. One is its first publication in English, while the rest are reprints from F$SF, CLARKESWORLD, INTERZONE, UPGRADED, WORLD SF BLOG, LIGHTSPEED, UNCANNY, CARBIDE TIPPED PENS, and tor.com. Of these, CLARKESWORLD has made a concerted effort to publish science fiction in translation on a regular basis; as was noted on the "Coode Street Podcast", this approach is much more effective and respectful than having a one-shot issue of works in translation, and then returning to all English-language stories for all the issues after that. But it is also more difficult, because you have to work at continually finding works worth translating (mostly in languages you do not read), and finding translators for them. Luckily, for Chinese science fiction, we have Ken Liu, a real treasure, dedicated to finding and translating Chinese science fiction, even though that takes time away from writing his own fiction. The variety of works Ken Liu has chosen means that not all of them will please everyone. I found Chen Quifan's stories a bit too cyberpunk for me. Xia Jia's stories "A Hundred Ghosts Parade Tonight" and "Tongtong's Summer" reminded me a bit of Zenna Henderson, not in subject matter, but in feeling. (Or at least in how I remember Henderson; it has been a long time.) Ma Boyong's "The City of Silence" could be described as "1984 meets FAHRENHEIT 451", and indeed there are internal references to support this. Ma's other works as described by Liu in his introduction sound fascinating, but he also says that the myriad cultural references in them would make them incomprehensible to most Western readers. Liu's comments about how the Chinese version of "The City of Silence" had to be phrased to get past the censors, and how the English version changed that are worth reading. Liu compares Hao Jingfang's "Invisible Planets" to the work of Italo Calvino; I see a similarity to Jorge Luis Borges as well in the use of description rather than plot or characters to define the work. "Folding Beijing" is a Hugo winner; 'nuff said. Tang Fei's "Call Girl" just did not work for me, nor did Chang Jingbo's "Grave of the Fireflies". Liu Cixin's "The Circle" is the excerpt from THE THREE-BODY PROBLEM I mentioned earlier, and I really liked his "Taking Care of God", which I would rate as the best in the book. Of course, one of the things to say about Chinese science fiction is that it is not a monolithic genre. Yes, the effects of Communism and its decline have influenced some Chinese writers, but others draw their inspiration from post-colonialism, the successes of science, the failures of science, and even the influx of Western science fiction, both in English and in translation. There are visions influenced by cyberpunk, visions influenced by Chinese history and traditions, and influenced by various literary movements, and visions that defy categorization. The result is that a collection of a dozen stories can hardly represent the broad range of Chinese science fiction, anymore than a similar-sized volume could represent American science fiction. The best one can consider this is as a sampling of the past decade. [-ecl] =================================================================== Mark Leeper mleeper@optonline.net Cleanliness becomes more important when godliness is unlikely. -- P. J. O'Rourke