Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
10/27/17 -- Vol. 36, No. 17, Whole Number 1986

Co-Editor: Mark Leeper,
Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper,
All material is copyrighted by author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
inclusion unless otherwise noted.

To subscribe, send mail to
To unsubscribe, send mail to
The latest issue is at .
An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at

        Science Fiction (and Other) Discussion Groups, Films,
                Lectures, etc. (NJ)
        My Picks for Turner Classic Movies in November (comments
                by Mark R. Leeper)
        TOMORROW'S KIN by Nancy Kress (an audiobook review
                by Joe Karpierz)
        221B Drabbles (letter of comment by Robert L. Mitchell)
        World Leadership Correspondence School, 221B Drabble,
                TRANSFORMATION, CHILLER (letter of comment
                by John Purcell)
                GUIDE TO THE CIVIL WAR)
                (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)


TOPIC: Science Fiction (and Other) Discussion Groups, Films,
Lectures, etc. (NJ)

October 29: Something's Out There: A Reading of Edgar Allan Poe's
        "The Raven" and Algernon Blackwood's "The Wendigo" (a
        performance by the Garden State Speculative Fiction
        Writers), Old Bridge (NJ) Public Library, 2PM
November 9: CAT PEOPLE (1942) & "The Bagheeta" by Val Lewton
        (available in Marvin Kaye's WEIRD TALES and Peter Haining's
        VAMPIRE OMNIBUS), Middletown (NJ) Public Library, 5:30PM
November 10: CACHE (2005), Middletown (NJ) Public Library, 12N
November 16: THE FOREVER WAR by Joe Haldeman, Old Bridge (NJ)
        Public Library, 7PM
December 8: IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE (1946) or JOYEUX NOEL (2005),
        Middletown (NJ) Public Library, 12N
January 12, 2018: THE IMITATION GAME, Middletown (NJ) Public
        Library, 12N
January 25, 2018: OLD MAN'S WAR by John Scalzi, Old Bridge (NJ)
        Public Library, 7PM
March 22, 2018: THE LEFT HAND OF DARKNESS by Ursula K. LeGuin,
        Old Bridge (NJ) Public Library, 7PM

Northern New Jersey events are listed at:


TOPIC: My Picks for Turner Classic Movies in November (comments by
Mark R. Leeper)

Well, November is coming and this year people are heaving a sigh of
relief.  Mid-June to mid-November marks the usual hurricane season.
This year Texas, Florida, Puerto Rico, and many other islands in
the Caribbean got clobbered very seriously.  It will take five or
six years to repair the damages and a lot will never be completely
fixed.  I live in Central New Jersey where we were hit by the
Hurricane Sandy storm surge in 2012.  We see daily reminders in the
form of leaning trees and power company polls.  We got no power for
nine and a half days.  That hit early November, just at the end of
the season.  They had to postpone Halloween Trick or Treating.  For
any of you affected by this year's storms I wish you good luck.
All times listed are for people in the Eastern Time zone.  Hope you
make it okay.

As for recommendations for the month, this time I will start with
the best, just to vary my style.  Even so this is not a month with
obvious best-film choices.  Maybe I will pick as "the best film of
the month" THE FRONT (1976).

THE FRONT is Martin Ritt's comedy/drama of how the Hollywood
Blacklist did its damage.  It destroyed careers, marriages, and
upended entire lives.  It also dragged down the quality of films.
Some of the most talented filmmakers could not find work because of
opinions they may or may not have once held most without ever
breaking any laws.  Woody Allen stars as a talentless nebbish who
agrees to submit scripts actually written by a blacklisted friend.
All around him are people whose careers were destroyed in the
witch-hunts.  Allen manages to bring some humor to the situation at
the same time the subject matter is deadly serious.  The film
features writers and actors who were all blacklisted.  It is
difficult to make a film with comedy and with strong drama.  Here
it works very well.  Those interested in this topic should look up
the very fine film TRUMBO.  [Tuesday, November 28, 8:00 PM]

An old favorite film of mine is NO HIGHWAY IN THE SKY (a.k.a. NO
HIGHWAY) starring Jimmy Stewart.  The film is based on a novel by
Nevil Shute, who also authored the nuclear war novel ON THE BEACH.
Theodore Honey (Stewart) is a "boffin"--a sort of absent-minded
scientist off in is own world--who is convinced that his company's
new super-aircraft will crash after a certain number of hours in
the air.  He just wants to prove his science is correct and since
nobody believes him anyway he retires to his office collecting data
for his proof.  Then (in a somewhat contrived manner) he finds
himself in flight on one of the planes he thinks is doomed.  He
knows he has to break out of his bubble and convince people he is
right or people will die. The film has a lot of wit with few clues
of how Stewart's mind is brilliant but somehow oblivious and
obtuse, always thinking "outside the box."  The film stars Jimmy
Stewart, Jack Hawkins, Glynis Johns, and Marlene Dietrich.
[Thursday, November 16, 4:00 AM]

French New Wave director Jules Dassin adapted RIFIFI (1955) from
the original novel. In this French film an ex-con has a choice of
going straight or taking part a heist that seems very well planned.
The theft sounds foolproof, but the aftermath poses disaster for
the whole gang.  The heist itself goes for thirty-five minutes
without a single word being spoken by the thieves.  That makes it
grab the viewers' attention and is absolutely magnetic.  The final
visual image is unforgettable.  This is one of the greatest heist
films of all time.  It certainly inspired a lot of other crime
films.  The atmosphere and story are delightfully noir.  [Tuesday,
November 21, 02:00 AM]



TOPIC: TOMORROW'S KIN by Nancy Kress (copyright 2017, Tor, 2017
Blackstone Audio, ASIN: B073C62QWM, ISBN-10: 0765390299, ISBN-13:
978-0765390295, 11 hours and 3 minutes, narrated by Marguerite
Gavin) (an audiobook review by Joe Karpierz)

TOMORROW'S KIN is the first book of the "Yesterday's Kin" trilogy,
and an expansion of the 2014 novella Yesterday's Kin, which won the
Nebula award for Best Novella at the 2015 Nebula Awards ceremony
held in Chicago.  While it was not my favorite that year--"We Are
All Completely Fine" by Daryl Gregory would have gotten my vote if
I was an eligible voter--I did like it quite a bit.  I had a few
quibbles with it, but all in all it was a fine story.  Sometime
after that I'd heard she was going to expand it into a novel; I
was unaware and surprised that the intent was to expand it into
a trilogy.  I wasn't then, and am not now, quite sure where she
is going with the story, but the pleasure is in the discovery of
reading it, I suppose.

The first third or so of TOMORROW'S KIN is the original novella--
probably with some modifications (to be fair, I don't remember the
original well enough to be able to pick up on changes, although I
suspect they're minor)--while the last two thirds or so continues
in the aftermath of the Denebs visit and the Earth passing through
the spore cloud.  The spore cloud did not kill off humanity as was
originally indicated by the Denebs.  Instead, the cloud caused
havoc with other portions of the ecosystem on Earth, causing the
balance of nature to be thrown off thus causing massive economic
and ecological issues.  To be sure, some humans were killed by the
spore cloud, but most were not.  Still, the unforeseen--by
humanity, but maybe not by the Denebs--have divided the natives of

As a sign of gratitude, the Denebs have given us the plans and
technology to build a starship.  But the gift of interstellar
travel has, for many, raised even more suspicions of the Denebs.
If they knew that the spore cloud was going to have the
aforementioned unintended consequences, what else are they not
telling with this gift?  Feelings and opinions are split.  One
faction would like to build the starship and make a peaceful
visit to "World", as the home planet of the Denebs is called.
Another faction would like to use those starships to travel to
World and attack the Denebs, and a third doesn't trust them and
want nothing to do with the starship.  Maryanne Jenner, the
protagonist of the original novella now has a role with a
foundation that supports traveling to the stars.  She travels
the country making speeches on behalf of a foundation that is
supporting the effort to build the starship in the United States
(it should be noted that many nations world-wide are attempting to
build the starship, and that there are at least three different
efforts going on in the United States alone.  Maryanne is
approached by the head of one of the efforts; he wants to give her
foundation lots of money to go out and spread the good word of
going to the stars.  He is a shady character at best, and his
motives are questionable.

One of the other side effects of the spore cloud is that children
who are born after the Earth passes through the cloud cry almost
continuously for a good portion of the first couple of years of
their lives.  Sometimes the crying stops, other times it does not--
leading to undesirable outcomes.  It is discovered that those who
stop have a gift; they can hear sound above the highest frequency
and below the lowest frequency previously known to be audible by
humankind.  As you might guess, the discovery of this gift has
huge implications for the story.

As with the original novella, Maryanne Jenner's family is central
to the entire novel, although the focus really comes down to her
grandchildren.  Her son Noah has left with the Denebs to go to
World.  Her daughter Elizabeth is largely offstage for the last
two thirds of the book, probably working against the efforts to
build a starship, and her son Ryan has descended into depression
over his role in the Deneb visit.  I expect that all three of
Maryanne's children will have large roles to play in the remaining
two books of the trilogy.

As is probably obvious, the book is not only about family, but
about consequences, unintended or not.  All actions have
consequences, and it's how we as a race react to and deal with
those consequences that define who we are as individuals and as a
species.  Most times the consequences we deal with are not
enormous or far reaching.  It's the nature of fiction, however,
that consequences that characters deal with are far reaching and
significant.  I feel that the characters of TOMORROW'S KIN have
barely scratched the surface of what's to come, and I'm looking
forward to the next book in the trilogy.

Marguerite Gavin is an outstanding narrator, one of the best I've
listened to.  She has a tremendous ability to voice all sorts of
characters, whether they be male or female, child or adult, or
even human or machine simulated.  I enjoyed her voice and pacing.
Like Jefferson Mays, who narrates the outstand Expanse series of
novels, I would be thrilled to listen to more of her narration.
I hope she continues to narrate the Yesterday's Kin trilogy.  It
will make the listening experience all that much more worthwhile.


TOPIC: 221B Drabbles (letter of comment by Robert L. Mitchell)

In response to Evelyn's 221B drabble in the 10/20/17 issue of the
MT VOiD, Robert Mitchell writes:

A Drabblish acknowledgement:

Evelyn, you wrote a very clever Holmesian Drabble!  Thank you for
sharing the concept, and your story.  It caught Sherlock's
personality recognizably, was written in a style evocative of
Arthur Conan Doyle's, tied into the SF genre quite snuggly by
using THE WAR OF THE WORLDS (which would have been contemporaneous
with Holmes), and finally, I can't imagine a more appropriate "B"
word (since that was a complaint Holmes often expressed, especially
in the earlier stories)!  I'm inspired to try to write one of my
own Drabbles, but it would be hard to outdo the one you shared with
us.  [-rlm]


TOPIC: World Leadership Correspondence School, 221B Drabble,
TRANSFORMATION, CHILLER (letter of comment by John Purcell)

In response to Mark's comments on the World Leadership
Correspondence School in the 10/20/17 issue of the MT VOiD, John
Purcell writes:

I really got a chuckle out of that WORLD LEADERSHIP CORRESPONDENCE
SCHOOL schtick Mark reprinted from the MT VOID of June 4, 1986.
Now, I understand that he was being frivolous back then, but yeah,
in retrospect it sure does sound very prescient considering the
whackadoodle currently residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20500. The curriculum offered sure does sound like
Drumpf enrolled in this course and passed with flying colors.  The
problem with this kind of humor is that it is so damned accurate
that it should be more of a warning, like all good comedy is,
rather than something that makes you laugh just because it's
funny.  All good humor has a grain of truth in it, as pundits have
proclaimed over the years.  [-jp]

Mark replies:

I am really pleased you liked the column.  Your comments remind me
of something Robert DeNiro said as Al Capone in THE UNTOUCHABLES.
"We laugh because it is funny and we laugh because it is true."
Sadly it is both.

In response to Evelyn's drabble, John writes:

Thank you, Evelyn, for that "221B Drabble."  I really enjoyed
this. In fact, this sounds like a great writing exercise for my
literature classes next semester.  Okay if I steal this idea?
Proper credit shall be given to you, of course.  [-jp]

Evelyn responds:

Credit goes to the Finns, who apparently invented this (in
Finnish, of course).  At least that is the impression I got from a
panel on drabbles held at the Worldcon in Finland (available on
YouTube).  [-ecl]

In response to Joe Karpierz's review of TRANSFORMAYION, John

More thank yous for the review of James Gunn's new novel
TRANSFORMATION, which sounds very interesting.  I have always
enjoyed James Gunn's stories ever since I read THE IMMORTALS
(1964) during my senior year in high school, which was in 1972.
He's a solid science fiction writer who always puts believable
characters into believable settings with believable scientific
background. Come to think of it, I need to get TRANSCENDENTAL
(2013) and TRANSGALACTIC (2016), too.  Gotta have 'em all!  [-jp]

In response to Gregory Benford's comments on CHILLER, John writes:

And also Gregory Benford's CHILLER (1993) needs to be added to my
shelves.  Fortunately there is plenty of room since we just cleared
out a bunch of old books to take to the Half-Price Bookstore or
donate to Read Africa, something my employer, Blinn College,
supports.  [-jp]


TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

On our recent trip, we listened to the audio recording of STAR
BEAST by Robert A. Heinlein (full cast audio, ISBN 978-1-933-32247-
2).  It was surprising how topical it was, with people complaining
about robot cars, politicians making outrageous, uninformed
statements, citizens complaining about aliens on Earth and starting
"humans first" movements, and so on.  It was also surprisingly
dated, with people smoking every other time you turned around and
amazingly sexist comments from both male and female characters.
The protagonist's girlfriend is shown as very clever, but his
mother is merely domineering.  (It is pretty obvious that this is
aimed at a male teenaged audience.)

WAR by H. W. Crocker III (ISBN 1-433-25123-X) or rather, we
listened to one disc of the ten.  The problem was that it was far
too annoying to listen to Crocker's attempts to justify the
legality of the South's secession and the rightness of its cause..
Do not misunderstand--there are definitely actions of the Union
during Civil War that were not only of questionable legality, but
that were flat-out illegal: the creation of West Virginia, the
suspension of habeas corpus, and the special requirements laid on
Southern states before they we "re-admitted" to the Union that the
Union claimed they could not leave.

But Crocker persists in saying things like "South Carolina wanted
to secede because they felt the Northern states were oppressing
it", or "Virginians just wanted to continue their lifestyle and
traditions", or "the way of life is the South was slower and
easier, with the rough edges smoothed off."  What he means, of
course, is "white males in South Carolina wanted to secede because
they felt the Northern states were oppressing it", or "white
Virginians just wanted to continue their lifestyle and traditions",
or "the way of life in the South for rich whites was slower and
easier, with the rough edges smoothed off."

He also argued both that since the states were independent
sovereign entities that formed the United States, they could
secede, and because the colonies were colonies they could not
secede from England.  But when was Arkansas an independent entity?


                                           Mark Leeper

           Near this spot
           Are deposited the remains of one
           Who possessed Beauty without Vanity,
           Strength without Indolence,
           Courage without Ferocity,
           And all the virtues of Man, without his vices.
           This praise, which would be unmeaning Flattery
           If inscribed over human ashes,
           Is but a just tribute to the memory of
           Boatswain, a Dog.
                                           --Lord Byron,
           Inscription on the tomb of his Newfoundland dog, 1808