Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
10/09/20 -- Vol. 39, No. 15, Whole Number 2140
Co-Editor: Mark Leeper, *mleeper@optonline.net *
Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper, *eleeper@optonline.net *
Sending Address: *evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
*
All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by the
author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
inclusion unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to *eleeper@optonline.net
*
The latest issue is at *http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm
http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm*.
An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at
*http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm
http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm*.
Topics:
Cruel and Unusual (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
BIOHACKERS (television review by Dale Skran)
THE MEN WHO UNITED THE STATES by Simon Winchester
(book review by Gregory Fredrick)
Plastic-Eating Bugs (letter of comment by Tom Russell)
Translation (letters of comment by Daniel Cox,
Arthur Kaletsky, Paul Dormer, and Dorothy J. Heydt)
The Speckled Band (and Translation) (letters of comment
by Radovan Garabik, Gary McGath, and Paul Dormer)
NOSFERATU (letter of comment by Andre Kuzniarek)
This Week's Reading (DEEP TIME) (book comments
by Evelyn C. Leeper)
===================================================================
TOPIC: Cruel and Unusual (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
From Mark Leeper's Diary June 26, 1982:
Somehow I seem to hear news stories and pick up facts that nobody
else seems to be aware of. I don't know why that is. When I was
growing up I used to pop some strange fact I had heard at the
dinner table, like that somebody had created a musical tone that
sounded as if it was always descending but when it was done it
sounded higher than when it started. That was how it was described
on the radio. I brought that sort of thing up at the table and
nobody particularly commented on it. Years later I found out that
my father, at least, thought I had made them all up. Well, ...
maybe one in five I did make up but what can you expect--I was just
a kid and was not really worried about high standards of truth of
the sort that I have today, but still nobody believes me.
Incidentally, I eventually heard this tone played on the radio and
it didn't really sound to me as if it were descending.
Anyway, I was listening to the radio this morning, and in among the
stories of people squabbling over how to spend the "Peace Dividend,"
which high Pentagon officials now estimate to be over
$3.17, was one of those stories such as I would bring up at the
dinner table. A very important person in New York (sorry, I would
have listened closer if I had known what was coming up) has said
that inmates in the state's prison system should not be allowed to
watch cable television and should have to read instead. People on
the street would be less likely to commit crimes if they knew they
would be going someplace where they would have to read. That's
what she said. I wouldn't have thought it possible. How can one
person make a statement about a controversy I didn't know existed
and at the same time make both sides sound as if they have a total
IQ of 87?
What I learn from this is that our prison system considers a
fitting punishment for violent crime that people be forced to watch
movies such as RAMBO and DEATH WISH III and some crusader is
popping up and saying, "No, it is a worse punishment to make
hardened criminals read." I guess if I were to take sides (and I
feel like a jerk for doing it), I agree with our crusader. This
could start a whole revolution in our penal system. I think
hardened criminals should be forced to read Dickens and Shakespeare
and then be tested on what they have read. Parole hearings can
change from asking stupid questions such as "Have you rehabilitated
yourself?"--and what criminal ever says "No" to that one?--and ask
instead that the prisoner explain the symbolism of the whale in
MOBY DICK.
I personally think that Manuel Noriega should be punished by ten
years of wearing thick glasses with paper clips in the hinges, a
pocket protector full of pens, and white socks, and carrying a
Depression-era briefcase full of books. Let's see if it will scare
lawbreakers to know that if caught they will be sentenced to long
terms of being nerds. [-mrl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: BIOHACKERS (television review by Dale Skran)
BIOHACKERS follows the arrival of first-year medical student Mia
Akerlund at the University of Freiburg [an actual German
university]. She moves into a house shared by Chen-Lu, a somewhat
Asbergerish girl whose hobby is the genetic engineering of musical
plants, Lotta, a rich girl who likes to party, and Ole, a fame
obsessed nerd who bio-hacks himself. The time seems to be just bit
over the horizon, with student raves fueled by eye drops that
enhance night vision and pills that allow you to absorb more oxygen
so you can double the time you spend underwater.
Mia, however, is mostly interested in meeting Professor Tanja
Lorenz, a brilliant genetic engineer, and becoming her prize pupil.
The atmospherics are good, and I especially liked the "glowing
mouse chase" where Mia meets Jasper, Lorenz's chief lab assistant.
BIOHACKERS shines in the creation of a plausible group of nerds who
might actually exist somewhere very soon.
It should come as no surprise the Mia has a mission, and soon
proves herself both inventive and manipulative in accomplishing it.
Mia seems really smart--smarter than everyone else in a class of
100s of students--practices medicine as though she already was a
doctor--and has the lab technique of genetic technology Phd--all
while still a first year medical school student.
As a TV shows goes, the science is mostly plausible, although
sometimes things happen faster than is realistic in the lab. The
fundamental plot, however, is taken straight out of HIGH PLANS
DRIFTER--a stranger rolls into town seeking revenge for a horrible
wrong. And that stranger proves to be something more than meets the
eye.
I enjoyed BIOHACKERS, but the spy plot came over more as teen drama
than realistic some of the time, and the "ethical dilemmas"
contrived. Having said all this, I'm rating BIOHACKERS +1 ON THE
-4 TO +4 scale, and recommending it to SF fans. Compare to ORPHAN
BLACK and HANNAH.
SPOILER ALERT
When the main character casually mentions that she is not sick, and
in fact, has never been sick, the experienced SF fan knows what is
going on. Mia, it evolves, it not actually Mia, but Emma, the last
survivor of an earlier genetic project of Dr. Lorenz's, "Homo
Deus." It's a bit vague exactly what Homo Deus was working toward,
but Emma came out of it with apparent immunity to all disease.
Although this may not have been the focus of Homo Deus, Emma is
surely genius level smart, and really well trained in biotech. She
is also an inventive, daring, ruthless, and manipulative operative,
somewhat warmer than the icy HANNAH, but way beyond other people
her age in social engineering. For a less than movie-star beauty,
her skills at seduction are excellent, leading one to suspect a bit
of pheromone help. Emma also has high motivation, as she blames
Lorenz for the death of both her brother and her parents.
BIOHACKERS has been renewed for a second season, and I'll be
watching it. The main flaw is that the ethical sins of Dr. Lorenz
are contrived and unbelievable. We are asked to believe she
inserted genetic flaws into over 250 fetuses so she could test
cures. The cures didn't work on any of the kids but Emma. This
makes Lorenz not a doctor who failed to cure sick kids, but a Dr.
Mengele who created the sick kids in the first place. Why, one
wonders? Don't we have enough kids with birth defects? This might
have been fixed with better scripting, but as presented it makes
the story potted and biased against Lorenz, who has no strong
motivations. Lorenz is helping Jasper, her main henchperson, cure
his own Huntington's disease, and we are led to believe that the
government won't sanction any genetic cures of this disease. The
German government is very restrictive on genetic research, but this
seems difficult to fathom. Again, this might have been fixed with
a stronger script. [-dls]
[BIOHACKERS is available on Netflix.]
===================================================================
TOPIC: THE MEN WHO UNITED THE STATES: AMERICA'S EXPLORERS,
INVENTORS, ECCENTRICS, AND MAVERICKS, AND THE CREATION OF ONE
NATION, INDIVISIBLE by Simon Winchester (book review by Gregory
Fredrick)
This is a history book that looks at the individuals who helped to
unite this vast and diverse country. When Jefferson purchased the
820,000 square miles of France's possessions in North America in
1803 he needed to know a lot about what he just bought. So, he
sent Lewis and Clark to survey it. They only lost one man in their
journey which otherwise was very successful. The explorers kept
notes about the environment, people, plants and animals they
encountered. Sacagawea, a female Native American, who joined their
mission was valuable as a guide and interpreter. Before the
railroads were built; canal building was seen as a way to ship
goods and people across the country. Even George Washington
realized the importance of this method of transportation but not
much came of this during his time. Eventually as Americans learned
of canal building technology from the English we started to build
our own canals. The Erie Canal is one of the most famous and most
successful canals; it sent goods from the Midwest down to New York
city and made New York a wealthy port city. Theodore Judah was the
main driving force to start a railroad that traveled across the
country. He planned the rail line route thru the Donner Pass which
is a mountain pass in the northern Sierra Nevada mountains this was
a missing link in the plan to run a railroad across the country.
Later Lincoln signed into law the Pacific Railroad Act that
appropriated the money for this construction. Inventors like
Samuel Morse, Alexander Bell, Edison, and Tesla, are mentioned in
the book as others who also contributed to the uniting of the
country with new inventions, like the telegraph, the telephone and
electric power. The author is very good at detailing these seminal
events in American history. This book is a good read if you like
history. [-gf]
===================================================================
TOPIC: Plastic-Eating Bugs (letter of comment by Tom Russell)
*https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/sep/28/new-super
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/sep/28/new-super*-
enzyme-eats-plastic-bottles-six-times-faster:
"A super-enzyme that degrades plastic bottles six times faster than
before has been created by scientists and could be used for
recycling within a year or two."
Tom notes: The plastic-eating bugs will not know the difference
between what has been thrown away and what has not. Long before
the oceans are clean all the vinyl siding will have fallen off
houses, cell phones will have dissolved and everyone will be
wearing hand-woven natural cotton clothes. [-tr]
Mark notes:
This sounds like the plot of MUTANT 59: THE PLASTIC EATERS by Kit
Pedlar. [-mrl]
Tom replies:
I didn't recall any story about plastic eaters but not surprised
that you recall one.
There was an amateur(?) video documentary in our county library
called "Blue Vinyl" that exposed the problems with that plastic.
It's the only video on the subject that l have seen. [-tr]
===================================================================
TOPIC: Translation (letters of comment by Daniel Cox, Arthur
Kaletsky, Paul Dormer, and Dorothy J. Heydt)
In response to Gary Labowitz's comments on translation in the
10/02/20 issue of the MT VOID, Daniel Cox writes:
"We eat what we can and what we can't, we can" and its British
translation appear in an episode of "Duffy's Tavern". "Duffy's
Tavern" is an "old time radio" comedy set in what we might call "a
dive". I believe the Englishman who translates the remark was
played by Arthur Treacher. [-dtc]
Arthur Kaletsky writes:
The other nice English-Russian-English roundtrip is "out of sight,
out of mind" which returns as "invisible lunatic".
Paul Dormer writes:
There are lots of stories like that [about being accurate but
missing the flavor]. There's that line in Pratchett
where one of the witches tells her favourite joke, "Give me an
alligator sandwich as fast as possible." (For those that don't
know the line, they can work out what it was supposed to be.)
And I'm also reminded of the street clown interviewed in Mayhew's
London Labour and the London Poor. His favourite joke:
Why is Rome like a candle wick?
For it is in the middle of Greece/grease.
Despite prompting by Mayhew, he insisted that was the correct line.
I remember a friend of my sister's back in the seventies saying she
was trying to tell a joke when she was on holiday. It was a joke
to do with the Last Supper and Chinese take-away food. The punch
line was Judas's carryout, a carryout being a take-away food place
and in her northern accent it did sound like Judas Iscariot.
Trouble was, she was trying to tell the joke in French. [-pd]
Evelyn supplies the original line (which Granny mangles) in the
Pratchett joke in WITCHES ABROAD: "Give me an alligator sandwich--
and make it snappy!"
Dorothy J. Heydt responds:
Hm. In Rome's heyday, Greece was in the middle of the Roman
Empire.
So what was the correct line (vide supra, Yank)?
Traduttore, tradittore.
(Italian proverb: a translator is a traitor.) [-djh]
Paul responds:
Well, I guess it was something like, "Why is Athens like a candle
wick?".
I must admit I've never read MAYHEM, although I have an abridged
version sitting on my to-be-read pile (purchased at the Museum of
London), but I saw a TV documentary about it a few years ago
introduced by Jonathan Miller, with dramatised extracts, including
the street clown, a most melancholy fellow, apparently.
And there was the pure collector, a sixty-something widow who
collected buckets of dog shit to sell to the tanneries in London.
Sixpence a bucket, she could most days get enough to buy a crust of
bread. It was better than going to the workhouse. [-pd]
Dorothy answers:
Yes. I've just finished reading THE GHOST MAP by Steven Johnson,
about the great cholera epidemic of London in 1854. It begins by
describing the horribly insanitary situation, including the hordes
of people who made their livings by collecting various kinds of
garbage, including "pure" (what cynic gave it that name, I've no
idea). Well worth reading. [-djh]
And Evelyn adds:
I was watching SHIP OF FOOLS the other day, and found the closed
captioning at times less than stellar. Lee Marvin plays an uncouth
racist, yet when he says "I wanna go home" the caption says "I want
to go home," and when he talks about a dark-skinned Mexican, the
caption says "negro" (at the time of the film the accepted term)--
but that is not what Marvin's character said. The result is that
those relying on the captioning will get an incorrect view of
Marvin's character. [-ecl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: The Speckled Band (and Translation) (letters of comment by
Radovan Garabik, Gary McGath, and Paul Dormer)
In response to Mark's comments on "The Speckled Band" in the
10/09/20 issue of the MT VOID, Radovan Garabik writes:
It was (and still is) widely believed that snakes like milk. Was it
already known to be a myth at that time?
[Mark writes,] "And people in the story think the words mean a
speckled band of gypsies." [-mrl]
That's quite untranslatable, because "band" as the "group of
people" and "band" as the "thin long piece of cloth" are usually
two different words. In the Slovak translation, the "cloth"
meaning has been selected by the translator, and people in the
story considered multicolo(u)red headbands the gypsies usually wear
to point out to the gypsies.
ObSF: While flipping through TV channels yesterday, I watched a few
minutes of Golden Eye, dubbed into Slovak. They talked about an
Electromagnetic pulse, and something to the effect that "in its
path it destroys everything by the mean of electronic equipment".
Now, in Slovak, it is a matter of putting the noun phrase into
instrumental, so the intended sentence is not *that* syntactically
different, but still ... another example of glaring incompetence in
translation. [-rg]
Gary McGath suggests:
Surely at some time or other, a musically inclined group of mystery
writers must have dubbed themselves "the Speckled Band." [-gmg]
Paul Dormer responds:
Reminds me of a skit on a radio comedy show back in the Seventies.
There was a big band, a sort of Glenn Miller tribute act as we'd
now say, led by Syd Lawrence.
Watson: Syd Lawrence has phoned to say that someone has splatter
his orchestra with paint.
Holmes: It's the speckled band again.
(Why I remember this stuff after nearly fifty years, I don't know.)
[-pd]
[More at
*https://groups.google.com/g/rec.arts.sf.fandom/c/hnF6HgGaWpQ
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.arts.sf.fandom/c/hnF6HgGaWpQ*.]
===================================================================
TOPIC: NOSFERATU (letter of comment by Andre Kuzniarek)
In response to Mark's comments on NOSFERATU in the 10/02/20 issue
of the MT VOID, Andre Kuzniarek writes:
[Mark writes,] "The only major difference is that the remake is in
color. But watching it one knows it could have been made with
modern techniques so you are less likely to be impressed. When you
see a silent film you make allowances for its age. The difference
is not that the first is done so much better but that one knows it
is not a classic so one can be critical in the way one would not be
with the original."
Older films, made before production techniques became more
sophisticated, almost have a cinema verite feel to them. Their
crudity aligns with old newsreels and documentaries. They are so
removed from modern film making that their alienness adds to the
atmosphere of strangeness, which only reinforces supernatural
subjects. But even the earliest DeMille "historical" epics like
King of Kings are so old that you might think you're watching a
documentary from the period--I'm sure kids would think so. Flash
Gordon serials used to freak me out as a little kid seeing them on
Sunday mornings in the 60s. They were so crude (compared to "Star
Trek") that they seemed like they must be more real somehow. And
being raised Catholic, Ming the Merciless looked like the Devil and
Mongo like raw documentary footage of Hell itself! [-ak]
Mark replies:
I can see how it might feel that way. But the rat-face did not
really make it more effective. [-mrl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
In DEEP TIME: HOW HUMANITY COMMUNICATES ACROSS MILLENNIA (Harper
Perennial, ISBN 978-0-380-79346-4), Gregory Benford writes about a
panel trying to put up warning signs where radioactive wastes are
buried--warning signs that will remain effective for tens of
thousands of years. They eliminate words and simple symbols, and
eventually discuss "mythic" symbols:
"The favorite of many panel members was fifty-foot-high Menacing
Earthworks, all radiating outward from the bare site center. These
are lightning-shaped, jagged, crowding in on the tiny traveler,
cutting off views of the horizon, chaotic. At the open center is
the existing Pilot Project concrete hot cell, going to ruin.
Beside it, a vast walk-on world map of all repositories of waste.
Added on, a map of New Mexico showing this site. The map is of
granite and domed, so sand blows off. A room buried beneath holds
details about what lies in the salt bed below, as do four smaller
buried rooms beneath the largest earthworks. Inscribed 'reading
walls' of granite appear throughout the site.
"The common ideas here are irregular geometries and anti-
craftsmanship. This contradicts human archetypes of perfection in
our imperfect world, which circles, squares, pyramids and spires
echo. Using crooked forms when plainly the designers knew 'better'
suggests a deliberate shunning of the ideal, a lack of value here."
This sounded good until I saw photographs of Balkan war memorials:
*https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/spomenik-memorials
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/spomenik-memorials*-
yugoslavia-balkans.amp
and the Treblinka Memorial:
*https://cdn.britannica.com/67/67867-004-144CDACE/memorial-site
https://cdn.britannica.com/67/67867-004-144CDACE/memorial-site*-
concentration-Treblinka-Poland-extermination-camp.jpg
Admittedly these are not of the scale Benford describes, but they
do tell me that the message that "Menacing Earthworks: sends
thousands of years in the future may not be what was intended.
[-ecl]
===================================================================
Mark Leeper
*mleeper@optonline.net *
One man's folly is another man's wife.
--Helen Rowland