Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
12/18/20 -- Vol. 39, No. 25, Whole Number 2150
Co-Editor: Mark Leeper, *mleeper@optonline.net *
Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper, *eleeper@optonline.net *
Sending Address: *evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
*
All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by the
author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
inclusion unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to *eleeper@optonline.net
*
The latest issue is at *http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm
http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm*.
An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at
*http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm
http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm*.
Topics:
Mini Reviews, Part 1 (DAVID ATTENBOROUGH--A LIFE ON OUR
PLANET, LEAP OF FAITH--WILLIAM FRIEDKIN ON THE
EXORCIST, CAMP CRIP) (film reviews by Mark R. Leeper)
THE ROOK (television review by Dale Skran)
THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY by Michio Kaku (book review
by Gregory Frederick)
Rudyard Kipling's Science Fiction (letters of comment
by Fred Lerner and Gary McGath)
Alan Dean Foster (and Rudyard Kipling) (letter of comment
by John Purcell)
This Week's Reading (Solar Pons books) (book comments
by Evelyn C. Leeper)
===================================================================
TOPIC: Mini Reviews, Part 1 (film reviews by Mark R. Leeper)
It is that time of year again when I vote on awards for films.
This is one very nice perq of my hobby of writing film reviews and
being a member of the Online Film Critic Society. Filmmakers and
publicists *want* me to see their films in the hopes that they (the
films, not the people) will be considered for awards. I get to see
new films either on-line or I get discs.
I have not yet worked out if the makers of films like last year's
ABOMINABLE really expect the critics to fall in love with their
films. They offer me a chance to see their output and there always
will be a few really good films. Films like SAUSAGE PARTY, well,
the title tells it all.
I cannot write my usual format for every film I see, but I can
write brief reviews for many. I do not know where these films will
play. These films may play in local theaters or in Manhattan art
houses. But I can let people know what to look for on Amazon Prime
and/or NetFlix.
This year will undoubtedly be a bit different. Far fewer films
were released to theaters, and the Academy Awards (the focus of the
awards season) have been moved from their usual date at the end of
February to the end of April. So there will not be as many reviews
as in previous years.
But here is the first batch, all documentaries.
DAVID ATTENBOROUGH--A LIFE ON OUR PLANET: Sir David Attenborough is
94 years old and has been traveling--and exploring--for 66 years.
This "witness statement" (his term) has a lot of beautiful and
familiar nature photography--familiar because it uses archival
footage from his films from those 66 years. Attenborough fits his
whole career into this framework, tracing the disappearance of
wilderness (and species) over that time. It has essentially a
very downbeat message; even his suggestions at the end fail to
provide much uplift. Released 10/04/20; available on Netflix
streaming. Rating: high +2 (-4 to +4)
LEAP OF FAITH--WILLIAM FRIEDKIN ON THE EXORCIST: This is a good
commentary and companion piece for the original film with many
ideas coming together. It has its own philosophical line and its
own gravitas, having as much profundity as the film itself. But
unlike with most films, see this commentary before seeing THE
EXORCIST, not after. (Okay, everyone interested in this
documentary will probably have seen THE EXORCIST but do not re-
watch it until *after* you watch this.) The film is basically
Friedkin talking and as such is long and a bit pedantic, but
contains much information. Released 11/19/20; available on Amazon
Prime. Rating: high +2 (-4 to +4)
CAMP CRIP: "Camp Crip" is the nickname given to Camp Jened, a
summer camp in upstate New York in the 1960s for handicapped (*)
children that grew into a national movement. The film covers many
people from their time as children at the camp (through the use of
home movies and some archival documentary footage) to their
emergence as leaders of the national disabled rights movement.
Released 03/25/20, available on Netflix streaming. Rating: +2
(-4 to +4)
[(*) The terms "disabled" and "handicapped" are both widely used
throughout this film, and the choice is not necessarily as a
function of when the speaker is talking. -ecl]
[-mrl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: THE ROOK (television review by Dale Skran)
I have observed in the past that if one person has a powered suit
that flies you get IRON MAN, a superhero story, while if one
thousand people have powered suits you get Heinlein's STARSHIP
TROOPERS, a war story. But in both cases, the general public is
aware that such a thing as powered suits really exist. There is a
third kind of story, perhaps more popular in the pages of Analog in
the 1950s, where people with super-powers exist in secret, and
either are affiliated with spy agencies, big corporations,
organized crime, or a resistance movement. In that case you get
THE ROOK, originally running for one season only on STARZ, and now
available for pay via Amazon Prime or Starz.
THE ROOK clearly did not find an audience, which is a shame. There
was a time when THE ROOK would have won the Hugo and been
considered a tremendous SF achievement. Now it is lost in the
clutter of a vast array of SF shows, a few of which are, in fact,
better TV. Recently my wife and I binged TIME-TUNNEL, a '60s SF
show that also did not make it to a second season. There is simply
no comparison--THE ROOK beats TIME TUNNEL in every regard--acting,
scripting, ideas, direction, etc.--and not by a small amount
either. Any yet, THE ROOK is lost in the fog of other shows.
Three things seem to have doomed THE ROOK. First, it is a super-
hero show that is tied to a little-known fantasy series by Daniel
O'Malley (THE ROOK, STILETTO) rather than Marvel or DC. Second, it
is populated by British actors who are unknown to a global
audience. Third, it is susceptible to the criticism that the plot,
although an interesting pastiche, is derivative of THE BOURNE
IDENTITY and AGENTS OF SHIELD.
There are two fundamental divisions in super-hero land: (1) the
hero with no or minimal powers [Batman] and (2) the hero with god-
like powers [Superman]. Among current TV series, HANNAH is more on
the Batman side, and THE UMBRELLA ACADEMY more the Superman side.
One problem with the god-like powers story is that the humans are
largely irrelevant; the story is mostly about the characters with
the god-like powers. This is much less true in THE ROOK where the
characters are just not powerful enough to ignore the world around
them the way Dr. Manhattan does in WATCHMEN. But, as I have oft
pointed out, a weak super team makes the best stories, i.e. when
the Avengers consisted of Captain America, Hawkeye, Quicksilver,
and the Scarlet Witch.
To discuss the plot of THE ROOK even in outline gives away a lot,
so I'm not going to go there. If you have any interest in super-
heroes, spy fiction, British spy fiction, or psionic powers THE
ROOK is a must see. I'm not going to claim THE ROOK is as good as
THE AMERICANS, CONTINUUM, or ORPHAN BLACK, but it is better than
lots and lots of other SF/fantasy TV shows. I'm rating THE ROOK a
+2 on the -4 to +4 scale, and suitable for teens and up. There is
violence, sex, and some terrifying situations of imprisonment. The
plot is complicated enough most kids wouldn't be able to follow it,
and there are some speculative sexual scenes involving characters
who are extremely different in complex ways that some might find
disturbing.
SPOILER WARNING--STOP NOW
In the opening scene of THE ROOK a young woman awakens in a heavy
rain on a bridge in central London. She is surrounded by eight
horribly mangled bodies. She does not remember who is she, what is
happening, or anything else. She runs. Soon she discovers that
her name is Myfanwy Thomas, a Rook in the Checquy, a secret agency
using superhumans to defend Britain, and that she appears to be
able to kill people in horrible ways without touching them. She is
offered a choice by her pre-memory wipe self--to seek a new life of
safety, or return to her dangerous life at the Checquy to find out
who did this to her. She decides to return and fight. Then things
get interesting.
One of the more interesting aspects of THE ROOK is the character
Gestalt, the other Rook in the Checquy. Gestalt is a single mind
spread over four bodies, two male identical twins, and a
male/female set of fraternal twins. They have been raised from a
young age to be the ultimate fighting squad, with perfect
coordination due to the apparently quantum level connection between
the four bodies. Although similar to the DC Character Triplicate
Girl, and Marvel Comics' Multiple Man, Gestalt is an original
addition to the super-hero pantheon. And did I mention Myfanwy and
Gestalt are exploring a sexual relationship?
A major difference from the books, wherein the powers are magical
in nature, is that THE ROOK presents a scientific-sounding
explanation for each power, and none of the powers shown are "god-
like". Myfanwy, in her post-wipe state may be one of the most
powerful characters, although another character's ability to memory
wipe an opponent is a close second, as is the "Queen's" ability to
manipulate air on a small scale. On the low end we see a little
girl with the ability to see in the dark and on the higher end an
American agent with Buffy-level super-strength. The "King's" power
is a kind of sonic blast, although not as strong as that displayed
by the Marvel character Banshee. [-dls]
===================================================================
TOPIC: THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY: TERRAFORMING MARS, INTERSTELLAR
TRAVEL, IMMORTALITY, AND OUR DESTINY BEYOND EARTH by Michio Kaku
(book review by Gregory Frederick)
Michio Kaku is a famous physicist and author who has also been on
many science TV shows. Kaku in this book describes how we can
travel to Mars and terraform it plus he also delves into topics as
diverse as interstellar travel, self-aware AI, self replicating
robotics, immortally, and other future concepts. NASA's plan to
travel to Mars, as detailed in the book, includes the Deep Space
Gateway which is a proposed space station orbiting the Moon, the
SLS rocket, the Orion capsule and the Deep Space Transport. The
Deep Space Transport is an assembled in space station which would
initially orbit the Moon then would be used to transport astronauts
to Mars. Terraforming Mars is a huge task but as discussed by the
author it could be done by injecting methane, and water vapor which
are greenhouse gases into Mars' atmosphere. Additionally,
satellites orbiting Mars could direct concentrated Sunlight to the
poles of Mars. These satellites would unfurl very large sheets of
either mirrors or solar panels. If solar panels are used the
collected energy could be converted to microwaves and then beamed
down to Mars' polar regions. Heating the poles would release water
vapor to again create a greenhouse effect.
The parameter known as specific impulse is introduced to the reader
to allow us to understand which form of rocket propulsion is the
most efficient. Specific impulse is the thrust of the rocket
multiplied by the time over which it fires. Ion engines, plasma
engines and nuclear fusion engines have increasing better impulse
in the order listed. NASA plans to use ion engines on the Deep
Space Transport to Mars. Plasma and nuclear fusion engines are
still ideas on the drawing board but NASA has been using and
improving the performance of ion engines for years. Interstellar
travel would use the solar sail Star-shot project design which has
been supported by Stephen Hawking. Gigawatt-powered lasers would
propel hundreds of solar sails each with a silicon chip filled with
sensors attached to it on a journey to our nearest Star system.
Many more ideas that seem more like science fiction but could
possibly become reality are also presented in this book. This
author usually writes a very enjoyable book and this one does not
disappoint. [-gf]
===================================================================
TOPIC: Rudyard Kipling's Science Fiction (letters of comment by Fred
Lerner and Gary McGath)
In response to Evelyn's comments on Rudyard Kipling's science
fiction in the 12/11/20 issue of the MT VOID, Fred Lerner writes:
[Evelyn wrote,] "One thing about all the technical detail in these-
-they would have been perfect for ASTOUNDING if ASTOUNDING had
existed then." [-ecl]
John Campbell made the same point during my 1962 interview with him
(which can be heard on the fanac.org website). [-fl]
Gary McGath writes:
"The Ship That Found Herself" is basically an allegory. The ship is
initially its separate parts, each thinking of itself as an entity.
Then, by some Borg-like process, they merge and become The Ship. I
think it's intended to represent recruits in a military
organization who become a unit.
It could be called fantasy. It's not intended to be plausible on a
literal level, even with suspension of disbelief, and that puts it
outside science fiction.
I don't remember ".007" well enough to comment on it. [-gmg]
===================================================================
TOPIC: Alan Dean Foster (and Rudyard Kipling) (letter of comment by
John Purcell)
In response to Mark's comments on Alan Dean Foster and STAR WARS in
the 12/11/20 issue of the MT VOID, John Purcell writes:
Alan Dean Foster is a good writer who deserves the royalties due to
him from Disney Corporation, an entity that I thoroughly no longer
appreciate. Foster is a fine writer--I enjoy his Flinx books--and
hey, if he's under contract for those books, then by crikey, he is
owed those royalties. As for Lucas' writing of the STAR WARS
mythos, Lucas may have control of the SW franchise, but it
is so obvious that he borrowed his story-line from so many sources
that Lucas could arguably be accused of plagiarism. I haven't read
Foster's THE TAR-AYIM KRANG since it first came out, so a re-
reading of it might be a good idea to see the parallels between
that book and STAR WARS. Your forty-three-year-old article still
holds up very well.
I need to do some more re-reading of old stories; in particular,
the Kipling stories you reference. It has been way too long.
[-jp]
===================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
I've been binge-reading "Solar Pons" lately, with everything else
on hold. August Derleth made no bones about the fact he was
copying Sherlock Holmes, even to the extent of using many of the
cases mentioned in passing in the Conan Doyle stories (and even a
retelling of one of the "Sherlock Holmes apocrypha"). Even when
the stories are original, Derleth uses some of the striking aspects
from Doyle--the use of phosphorus, for example.
Derleth does a good job of it. He brings the time forward to the
1920s and 1930s, so things are less Victorian/Edwardian, and he
make Parker (the Watson character) a bit more observant and
perceptive--not as much as Pons, of course, but able to deduce
quite a bit from the appearance of a client, the type of writing
paper used, and so on. [-ecl]
===================================================================
Mark Leeper
*mleeper@optonline.net *
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality,
they are not certain; as far as they are certain,
they do not refer to reality.
--Albert Einstein