THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
10/01/10 -- Vol. 29, No. 14, Whole Number 1617
C3PO: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
R2D2: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
All material is copyrighted by author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent will be assumed authorized for inclusion
unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Topics:
Ever Notice? I (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
My Picks for Turner Classic Movies for October (comments
by Mark R. Leeper)
Temple Grandin (letter of comment by Wendy Sheridan)
This Week's Reading (Macedonio Fernández) (book comments
by Evelyn C. Leeper)
==================================================================
TOPIC: Ever Notice? I (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Somehow "Ever Notice? II" got published September 17 before "Ever
Notice? I." (And nobody noticed.) Anyway, have you ever noticed
that "Evangelist" is an anagram of "Evil's Agent"? [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: My Picks for Turner Classic Movies for October (comments by
Mark R. Leeper)
Each month I have been looking at TCM's upcoming films on Turner
Classic Movies to see what unusual films are to be shown in the
month. I write this list for members of the mailing list of the
B-Movie Podcast and also for the MT VOID. I am particularly
choosing science fiction/horror/fantasy genre films.
October presents an unusual problem. TCM's line-up is an
embarrassment of riches. Presumably in honor of Halloween they
have over a hundred films lined up from the genre. They have
series of Hammer Films, Val Lewton films, William Castle films, and
Roger Corman films. However, looking over the list there are no
really obscure films scheduled for October. There are a few semi-
obscurities I can list. To see the full TCM science fiction,
horror, and fantasy schedule for all of October go to
http://leepers.us/TCM_OCT.txt. Just to start you out I will give
you the listings for this weekend:
October 1
2:15p Fail Safe (1964)
8p Horror of Dracula (1958)
9:30p Brides Of Dracula, The (1960)
11p Dracula, Prince of Darkness (1966)
October 2
12:45a Dracula Has Risen From the Grave (1969)
2:30a Psychomania (1973)
12p Seven Days In May (1964)
6:15p Land That Time Forgot, The (1975)
October 3
12p Wait Until Dark (1967)
It might be useful to just look for films you don't know and give
them a try. Okay, so what did I choose as the semi-obscurities?
THE DEVIL'S BRIDE (a.k.a. THE DEVIL RIDES OUT, 1968)
This was a film ahead of its time. Most supernatural films of the
time spent almost the entire film establishing that there really is
such a thing as the Black Arts. Then having established that, they
have a short horror sequence at the end. NIGHT OF THE DEMON is
typical. This film starts out basically saying, "In this world
Black Magic is real and very dangerous. Get used to it." From
there it goes to a coven of modern day witches and before long you
are seeing demons from Hell and even the Devil himself. There is
some very nice use of color. This film is tense all the way
through up to a not quite convincing Deus ex Machina ending.
Hammer films produced the film getting Richard Matheson to adapt
the first book of Dennis Wheatley's Black Magic series of novels.
(Friday, October 8, 9:45 PM)
THE DEVIL COMMANDS (1941)
When studios other than Universal started using Boris Karloff after
1935, mostly he made forgettable melodramas like THE MAN THEY COULD
NOT HANG and BEFORE I HANG. The best of his films for Warner was
THE WALKING DEAD. The best of his Columbia films was THE DEVIL
COMMANDS. Rather than having Karloff himself returning from the
dead, here he is a scientist who is working on interpreting
brainwaves. When his wife is tragically killed, he discovers he
can still pick up faint brainwaves from her from beyond the grave.
With the help of a fake spiritualist who has some very real powers,
he tries to perfect his machine that will let him talk to the dead.
This is an adaptation of the novel BY THE EDGE OF RUNNING WATER by
William Sloane. There are a lot of nicely stylized visuals in the
lab that he sets up. Anne Revere, a very interesting actress,
plays the spiritualist. (Saturday, October 30, 6:15 AM) (THE
WALKING DEAD: Saturday, October 30, 9:15 AM)
DEAD OF NIGHT (1945)
This is the father of all those Amicus anthology films. It was a
very successful film made just about as WWII was ending. If you
have never seen it ... too bad. You cannot quite appreciate it any
more, because too many of the ideas in the film have been plundered
by the likes of Rod Serling. But it is still a very good little
anthology film. The story of the ghost golfer is a bit off the
mark, but most of the rest of the stories are good or great. There
has been a lot of discussion about the surrounding story that ties
all the short stories together. (Thursday, October 28, 8 PM)
Incidentally they are also showing what I consider the best science
fiction film ever made, FIVE MILLION YEARS TO EARTH (aka QUATERMASS
AND THE PIT, 1968). That is Friday, October 22, 9:30 PM). It is a
good month for movies. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Temple Grandin (letter of comment by Wendy Sheridan)
In response to Mark's review of TEMPLE GRANDIN in the 09/24/10
issue of the MT VOID, Wendy Sheridan writes:
Thank you for your review about the Temple Grandin movie. I also
greatly enjoyed the Grandin biopic (I caught most of it on HBO when
it aired, and I'm planning to rent the DVD now that it's been
released). I may have overlooked it entirely had I not previously
heard an interview with her on NPR's "Fresh Air"
(http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId3383699)
and then subsequently read her book about animals, "Animals Make Us
Human". I was instantly able to recognize her in Claire Dane's
portrayal as the film was running and I channel surfed past it. I
wanted to pass the link and book title along, in case you hadn't
heard of these. Her discussions of animal behavior and animal
husbandry are fascinating.
Mark replies, "I had not seen/heard either of the sources you list.
I do find the subject and the person fascinating. Years ago when I
reviewed the film RAIN MAN I said in my review that in many ways
the character's autism seem like a boon in some ways rather than a
disability. A reader became enraged at the thought that I would
consider autism as something positive. We ended having several
exchanges, with her angrily insisting that autism is a disability.
I think Grandin has turned her special abilities into real
contributions in ways she would have been unable to do if she were
not autistic. Thanks for the information." [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
[This is one of the excerpts from my article on the Borges class
that I mentioned last week.]
Macedonio Fernández (known simply as Macedonio) was one of Jorge
Luis Borges's most important and influential mentors, and a
fascinating author. In the introduction to his SELECTED WRITINGS
IN TRANSLATION, Jo Anne Engelbert says, "A mischievous destiny
caused him to be born a congenital Idealist inside a Materialist
stronghold, the Buenos Aires of 1874, where, as in most parts of
the Western world, believes in a solid world out-there controlled
not only metaphysics, the libraries and the press, but psychology,
language and art. He was dismayed at the hallucinations of his
contemporaries, who were obsessed by a belief in a world composed
of matter ..."
As an example of the conflict between Idealism and Materialism,
Engelbert writes of Macedonio's "perplexity ... at unaccountably
finding himself the owner of a body that occupied space, collided
with bodies, felt pain. His feeling toward his body seemed to be
that of a person who finds himself holding on a leash a giant
ostrich which whom he has only a nodding acquaintance."
But it is not just Idealism that sets Macedonio apart. He seems to
have cultivated a very playful (or perhaps convoluted) approach to
language, making translation difficult and the diagramming of
sentences well nigh impossible. He was particularly fond of
parenthetical phrases, often nested and sometimes used to introduce
totally unrelated and unconnected ideas. As Engelbert describes
it, Macedonio develops his style "through the simple expedient of
allowing each linguistic node to branch, and each branch to
continue to bifurcate...." This style may have inspired Borges's
"The Garden of the Forking Paths", with its many bifurcations and
with its notion of a book as labyrinth.
And indeed I am getting side-tracked in SELECTED WRITINGS. Once I
got the book, I figured I would read it all (it's only 124 pages).
and I kept finding gems, such as this from "Toward a Theory of
Humor": "Although 'rationality' has a positive affective resonance,
that is, a pleasurable connotation, because it seems to be
synonymous with our general security of life and conduct,
nevertheless, as soon as it is experienced as an inexorable,
universal law, it limits the richness of the possibilities of
life."
Macedonio also made up words ("un almismo ayoico" apparently means
something like "psychic manifestation"). In this he was not unlike
Lewis Carroll or James Joyce, but it makes translation difficult.
In a review of Macedonio's first book, Borges wrote, "In the
complex kind of plotting practised by Wells and company, the
quotidianity of life is exact, and hallucination is achieved by
introducing some absurd contingency which ... is sufficient to
topple the previously rigid edifice. ... Generalizing ..., I
should like to suggest that the imaginative novel is nothing more
than the doggedly logical exploitation of a single whim. I know of
only one exception. In the digression of Macedonio Fernández I
seem to see an imagination in constant exercise: an activity that
buoyantly goes on designing universes, not codified or fatal like a
chess problem, but spontaneous and irreverent like a good game of
truco...."
This can be summarized (I think) as saying that most science
fiction relies on changing just one thing and seeing what develops
from that (an idea in fact first expressed by Wells), but Macedonio
does not restrain himself that way.
Macedonio writes, "I wanted a constant fantasy for my pages, and
realizing how hard it is to avoid the hallucination of reality, the
blemish of art, I have created the only character born to date
which consistent fantasy can guarantee a solid unreality in this
undegradeable-to-real novel: the character who isn't there, whose
existence in the novel makes him fantastic with respect to the
novel itself, in the same way that the world, being, seems real to
us because there are dreams. I trust him to save the fantasy here
if all else fails: he is the Traveler, who in life itself may not
exist at all--I don't believe in Travelers: the two attributes that
define the high quality traveler are the faculty and wish to forget
and the faculty and wish to be forgotten." ["Museum of the Novel
of Eterna--The First Good Novel"] Is this going to connect to
Italo Calvino's IF ON A WINTER'S NIGHT A TRAVELER? It is true that
one does occasionally see the non-existent character in stories (at
least one Agatha Christie novel used this device, and probably
more) or in real life (consider "The Man Who Never Lived" in World
War II).
And then Macedonio proposes something that other writers have
implemented as best they can--the conflation of reader and
character:
"I leave an open book: perhaps it will be the first 'open book' in
literary history, that is, the author, wishing it were better, or
at least good, and convinced that its mutilated structure is a
dreadful discourtesy to the reader, but also convinced that the
book is rich in suggestions, hereby authorizes any future writer
whose temperament and circumstances favor intense labor to correct
and edit it freely, with or without mentioning my name. The task
will not be small. Delete, amend, change, but, if possible, let
something remain. At this point I insist that my theory of the
novel could best be executed in a novel in which several persons
had gathered to read a novel together, so that they, the reader-
characters--readers of the other novel and characters of this one--
would constantly stand out as real persons because of the contrast
between themselves and the figures and images they were reading
about. Such a plot, made up of some characters who were both
reading and being read and others who were merely being read, were
it systematically developed, would comply with the demands of the
theory."
This idea is sometimes manifested as a second person point-of-view.
Howard J. Blumenthal's THE COMPLETE TIME TRAVELER is probably the
first instance I ran across of this, but obviously there are others
of a more literary nature. Paul Auster's inclusion of himself as a
character other than the narrator in THE NEW YORK TRILOGY
("Ghosts", "City of Glass" and "The Locked Room") is another
variation of this. [-ecl]
==================================================================
Mark Leeper
mleeper@optonline.net
As I would not be a slave, so I will not be a master.
-- Abraham Lincoln