THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
11/12/10 -- Vol. 29, No. 20, Whole Number 1623
Frick: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
Frack: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
All material is copyrighted by author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent will be assumed authorized for inclusion
unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Topics:
Logical Extension (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Innumeracy (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
A Quick Exploration of Higher Dimensional Spaces (comments
by Mark R. Leeper)
Ten Things I've Learned about Inheriting Stuff (comments
by Evelyn C. Leeper)
ESCAPE FROM HELL by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle
(audiobook review by Joe Karpierz)
SOUTH OF THE BORDER (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
Jesus Christ Avatar (letter of comment by Tom Russell)
MR. POTTERMACK'S OVERSIGHT (letter of comment
by Kip Williams)
PANDORA AND THE FLYING DUTCHMAN (letter of comment
by Arthur Kaletsky)
BRUNELLESCHI'S DOME (letter of comment by Peter Rubinstein)
This Week's Reading (THE GHETTO OF VENICE, MUSSOLINI'S ROMAN
EMPIRE, DARK WATER, WHEN IN ROME, PETER'S KINGDOM, and
O VATICAN!) (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
==================================================================
TOPIC: Logical Extension (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
I keep seeing the name "Chase Bank" on various pieces of business
mail. Whenever I see it somehow what I hear in my head is "Chase
Bank. Catch Bank. Kill Bank." [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Innumeracy (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Credit card companies live and die by their ability to understand
numbers and mathematical concepts and we depend on them to know
them. One of our credit card providers claims that every time you
use their card you get five chances to win a certain big prize.
Pop quiz: how much better are your chances if everyone who uses the
card earns five chances than if they only earned one chance each
time? It makes you wonder. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: A Quick Exploration of Higher Dimensional Spaces (comments
by Mark R. Leeper)
My godson came to me with a plane geometry question from his
Scholastic Aptitude Test. I turned it into a rather interesting
question about higher dimensions and how in higher dimensional
spaces it is harder to be confined by surrounding objects. I do
love it when a mathematics problem has some science fictional
implications.
[Sorry, without pictures I have to get by just describing the
diagrams.]
The question he started with was this: You have a square four units
on a side. It is divided into four identical quadrants each two
units on a side. In each quadrant you inscribe a circle. Each
circle has diameter two. What is the radius of the largest circle
you can put at the center of the square so that it is just tangent
to each of the four circles?
***************************
IF YOU ARE SOLVING THE PROBLEM, DO NOT READ BEYOND THIS LINE UNTIL
YOU ARE DONE.
***************************
Okay, is everybody back? The solution is this. Draw a line from
the center of one of the four big circles to the center of the big
square (which is also the center of the small circle). The length
of this segment is the square root of two. It intersects the large
circle you chose and the small circle where the two are tangent.
So the center of the large circle you chose is sqrt(2) units from
the center of the square and one unit from the center of the big
circle you chose. So the radius of the small circle is:
sqrt(2)-1. That is about 0.41421.
So that answered my godson's question. But I was not ready to let
him go yet. Suppose we were in three dimensions and you have a
4x4x4 cube with a sphere of unit radius in each of the octants of
the cube. Now you have a sphere at the center of the cube that is
tangent to all eight larger spheres. How much is its radius?
Well, solving this the same way, we take a line segment from the
center of one of the spheres to the center of the cube. How long
is that segment? By the Pythagorean theorem it is sqrt(1^2 + 1^2 +
1^2). Or it is sqrt(3). The radius of the small sphere is
sqrt(3)-1 or about 0.73205.
If you are having trouble seeing that, picture a right triangle,
one leg is a diagonal of a face and the other is an edge
perpendicular to that leg at a corner. The diagonal of the three-
dimensional cube has length sqrt(sqrt(1^2+1^2)^2+1^2) = sqrt(2+1)
sqrt(3).
In fact this generalizes to N dimensions. The diagonal of an N-
dimensional cube with edge-length one is sqrt(N).
And in each of these cases the radius of the big sphere is always
1. So in 2 dimensions the radius of the sphere (or circle) at the
center of the cube (or square) is sqrt(2)-1 or about 0.41421.
In three dimensions the radius of the sphere at the center of the
cube is sqrt(3)-1 or about 0.73205.
In four dimensions the radius of the sphere at the center of the
cube is sqrt(4)-1 or 1. This means the little sphere at the center
is as big as the 16 corner spheres hemming it in. There are
seventeen identical spheres in the hypercube and they pack very
nicely. The sphere at the center cannot move around.
When we get up to nine dimensions we are now packing a unit nine-
sphere in each of the 512 corners. The sphere at the center has
radius sqrt(9)-1 = 2. That means the inner sphere is now tangent
to each of the faces of the hypercube. The center sphere is
inscribed in the cube as well as being tangent to each of the
spheres.
Let us go in the other direction. In one dimension the formula
says that the inner sphere has radius sqrt(1)-1 or zero. Does this
agree with what we think should happen? A one-dimensional cube
with edge-length four is just a line segment of length four. A
sphere of radius one is just a line segment of length two. If you
take a line segment of radius four and fill it at each end with a
line segment of length two, they will end up just touching at the
center. The to fit between them a line segment must have length
zero.
Now what does this mean? In two dimensions the circles really
constricted the central sphere. It could be only about 0.41421
units in radius. In nine dimensions not only is the inner sphere
much bigger than the corner spheres, it is big enough to reach the
faces of the cube. It has room to get out of way of the corner
spheres. In nine dimensions the outer spheres very much stay out
of your way. In ten dimensions the inner sphere actually sticks
out of the hypercube.
That is an insight we might not have had about higher dimensions.
Essentially things much more stay out of your way. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Ten Things I've Learned about Inheriting Stuff (comments by
Evelyn C. Leeper)
As I noted last week, this is a set of rules learned from both my
and a friend's dealing with clearing out our parents' houses.
1) Don't keep changing your mind or giving contradictory
information (e.g., don't tell your siblings you don't want any of
the furniture and then later say you want the dining room table).
2) Don't be indecisive (e.g., "Gee, I'd like to have the big lamp,
but I don't know where I'd put it.").
3) Don't *assume* that some sentimental item that you say 'no' on
will get saved by someone else.
4) Try to find charities that will pick up the stuff you are
donating, rather than having to take it to them, and as few as
possible.
5) Find a liquor store that has a really huge pile of empty boxes.
6) Give your self enough time (at least a week just to clean out
and donate, more if there are valuable antiques).
7) Put the boxes in your house rather than rented storage. That
way you have to deal with them.
8) When in doubt, save it. You can always get rid of it later.
9) Use labels. Putting a label on the dresser that says "EMPTY"
will save you constantly opening the drawers to check.
10) Save all financial papers until the estate is settled.
[-ecl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: ESCAPE FROM HELL by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle
(copyright 2009 Blackstone Audio, 9 hours 22 minutes, narrated by
Tom Weiner) (audiobook review by Joe Karpierz)
ESCAPE FROM HELL is the sequel to 1976's INFERNO by Niven and
Pournelle. I'd loved INFERNO when it first came out all those
years ago. I was still in high school at the time, and it made me
want to read the original Dante. I never did do that. So, when
ESCAPE FROM HELL came out awhile back, I was torn. I wanted to
read it, but I'd been disappointed by sequels too many times (yeah,
I know--I've read the entire "Dune" series--we all have our
weaknesses) to trust it. So I didn't do anything about it at all
until I joined audible.com and saw that it was available. I
downloaded it and hoped for the best. What I got was something
that I didn't quite expect and was certainly, in my opinion, better
than I was expecting.
Allen Carpentier--now Allen Carpenter, his real name--is still in
Hell. If you remember, he watched Benito Mussolini leave Hell at
the end of INFERNO while he stayed behind. Now, he's the new
Benito, trying to lead people out of Hell--but I suspect with
different motives than Benito.
Carpenter has decided that he must rescue all the souls in Hell
that deserve rescuing (hold that thought). If you remember, Benito
answered Carpentier's call for help while he (Carpentier) was stuck
in the bottle in the vestibule. This time, he's free to wander
Hell (we never do find out why), so he decides to lead as many
people out as he can--or at least tell as many people as he can
that there is a way out. He wants everyone to have a chance to get
out. He is essentially trying to play savior (hold that thought
too). He once again travels the circles of Hell, this time with
poet Sylvia Plath, trying to figure out just what his purpose is
here and what the real purpose of Hell is.
So, just what is this book about? Well, it's not like INFERNO.
That book was supposed to be an adventure story that ended up being
much more than that. This one? I think this is Niven and
Pournelle exploring the questions and answers that many of us ask
ourselves: what's our purpose in this life, should everyone get a
second chance, are there really all bad people in the world, does
everyone deserve his/her fate?
In many ways, ESCAPE FROM HELL is a lot like INFERNO. We have a
central character touring Hell, trying to help people to get out.
In fact, that part is the old and boring part. If all Niven and
Pournelle had done was rewrite INFERNO, I probably wouldn't have
finished listening to it. But this book *is* different. On the
surface, other than Carpenter being the one trying to get people
out of Hell, one of the other noticeable differences is that unlike
INFERNO, where the souls trapped in Hell were all non-descript and
unnamed and Anglo-Christian, this one is much more than that. We
have other races and religions--and we have famous characters from
history. Among the list of notables is Anna Nicole Smith, Lester
Del Rey, Ted Hughes (Sylvia's husband on earth), Albert Camus, Carl
Sagan, and Pontius Pilate, among others. Oh, some of our friends
from INFERNO are back, but the story really is about the new
characters.
What's different about this book is that Carpenter (and by
extension, Niven and Pournelle), is trying to sort out the purpose
of Hell and why people are there: why some people are there and
not others; do certain people belong in a certain circle of Hell
and not a different one; do people really deserve to be in Hell for
all eternity, or should it be like a prison, where you serve your
sentence and then are released?; (pick up that thought) who
deserves to be freed and should stay there for all eternity, and
does Carpenter have the right to make that call when he's trying to
decide which souls to try and rescue?
This was a lot deeper book than the original, and in that respect
was a much better one. I was pleasantly surprised how the book
kept me engaged with all the ethical and moral questions that were
being asked (and in some case answered) by Carpenter. The original
has its place in SF history, and I think this one should too, but
probably won't--I've not seen too many reviews of the book that
were favorable. Finally, narrator Tom Weiner does a terrific job.
This book may not be for you, but I recommend you give it a try.
You might like it. [-jak]
==================================================================
TOPIC: SOUTH OF THE BORDER (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
CAPSULE: Oliver Stone says that there is a revolution of reform
going on in South America as several of the countries have
presidents who claim leftist views. He visits five countries and
seven of these presidents discussing their policies. Stone never
questions their policies and presents them with admiration. He
does not apologize for his bias, but presents a point of view
difficult to get listening only to the American media. Taken with
a grain of salt, there is something of an education here in how the
United States government manipulates the countries of South America
and how they are fighting back. Presidents interviewed are
Presidents Hugo Chavez (Venezuela), Evo Morales (Bolivia), Lula da
Silva (Brazil), Nestor Kirchner (Argentina), Fernando Lugo
(Paraguay), Rafael Correa (Ecuador), and Raul Castro (Cuba)
Rating: +1 (-4 to +4) or 6/10
Oliver Stone frequently takes the role of the United States
government's loyal opposition. His films like PLATOON, BORN ON THE
FOURTH OF JULY, and JFK take a generally leftist slant and
frequently edge over into conspiracy theories. In SOUTH OF THE
BORDER he takes a grand tour of countries in South America
interviewing the seven presidents who take the strongest leftist
slants. The better these leaders are known in the United States,
the more time he spends with them. His coverage of the presidents
is unswervingly positive. He seems to treat each of the presidents
as if he were a personal friend and his friendship is apparently
reciprocated on camera. Stone gives us positive, if not loving,
looks at each of the seven presidents.
Not surprisingly, the lion's share of attention goes to Hugo
Chavez, the President of Venezuela and probably the best known of
the reforming--if that is the word--presidents. Footage shows his
being friendly with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad--not necessarily the best
poster boy for the liberal movement and not really much of a
reformer either. Stone does not question the wisdom of this
friendship, but uses it to illustrate that Chavez has the courage
to defy United States interests. The DVD comes with 90 minutes of
extras mostly concentrating on Chavez and Venezuela. The
documentary's heavy emphasis on Chavez suggests that the film was
originally to be about just him and the coverage of the other
countries was an after thought or to extend the documentary to
feature length.
This is a useful documentary if the viewer knows that what she or
he is getting will not be an unbiased viewpoint. It is true that
American media coverage of South America is poor in general, though
not generally as bad as the excerpts from Fox News that Stone uses
to illustrate how bad coverage can be: Gretchen Carlson confusing
coca and cocoa. If Oliver Stone is trying only to improve on this
witless news coverage he is setting the bar rather low for himself.
But he is presenting the major reformers of South America in an
informal way in which they can present their viewpoints to the
American people.
Oliver Stone's coverage of this South American revolution is
certainly better than the education one might get from Fox News.
Within the United States this could be the best source for
information about South American politics and still not be very
good. SOUTH OF THE BORDER points to the need of a good
contemporary study of South American political movement rather than
actually filling that vacancy. I rate SOUTH OF THE BORDER a +1 on
the -4 to +4 scale or 6/10. Cinema Libre released this film on DVD
on October 26, 2010.
Film Credits: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1337137/
What others are saying:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/south-of-the-border/
[-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Jesus Christ Avatar (letter of comment by Tom Russell)
In response to Mark's response to his comments on AVATAR in the
10/15/10 issue of the MT VOID, Tom Russell writes:
Thanks for running "Jesus Christ Avatar"--my combination thought-
piece (about space exploration and the question of survival of
humankind without it) and related movie comments (about Avatar).
Some of what I wrote was probably too obscure, too dated, too
obtuse or just too confugled. Mark's response was helpful. May I
try again?
Sure, Noah had his ark, but now we know (ever since JAWS), "We're
going to need a bigger boat." Perhaps God told Richard Branson to
build a spaceship? It's too bad God didn't tell Warren Buffett ...
before Buffett gave his $34 billion to Bill Gates.... Buffett
seems more the Noah type than Branson.
On the "science" side of things, we learn from quantum physics that
the universe needs an observer to exist. And we learn from string
theory that the universe has eleven dimensions. So the observer is
watching us do our thing in 11D, not merely 3D (think AVATAR here.)
What's such a big deal about 3D anyhow? Even back in the days when
"As You Like It" was first performed it was done in "3D" (on stage).
Now we have: All the world's an 11D stage....
As to AVATAR copying earlier science fiction (comment by Frank
R. Leisti in MT VOID 10/22/10), how about the scene in which the
human is lying soulless on the table surrounded by electrical
gadgets and scientists are trying to bring him back to life?
Surely straight from FRANKENSTEIN? What, no 19-gigawatt bolt of
lightning?
Avatar would have been more fun--and a better movie?--if, instead
of a cowboys-and-Indians battle between people from Earth and
Pandora: Let the Pandorans be in an Old Testament era of their
history so the Earthlings get zapped by tongues of fire from the
Pandorans' Ark of the Covenant in the same way the Nazis got what
was coming to them in Raiders of the Lost Ark....
At the risk of not offending, I meant the title of my earlier
comments, "Jesus Christ Avatar", to be taken in the same usage
sense as "Jesus Christ lizard" is used to describe the little
lizard which can walk on water. Also, the words from "Jesus Christ
Superstar" were easily adapted to mock the main soul-beaming
silliness of the movie plot. Hence the multiply-ambiguous title of
my comments.
Perhaps the thing I disliked the most about AVATAR is it portrays a
future time when presumably humankind has become so advanced
scientifically and technically that we have been able to move
out beyond the Earth, and what are we doing? We're destroying
another planet. WAR OF THE WORLDS and we're the bad guys. That
vision of the future is worse than SOYLENT GREEN or Easter Island.
Possibly the movie's intent was to scare us in the same way SOYLENT
GREEN did, but even if that was its intent, it was still just plain
awful. [-tr]
==================================================================
TOPIC: MR. POTTERMACK'S OVERSIGHT (letter of comment by Kip
Williams)
In response to Evelyn's comment on MR. POTTERMACK'S OVERSIGHT in
the 10/29/10 issue of the MT VOID ("MR. POTTERMACK'S OVERSIGHT by
R. Austin Freeman ... is a detective story written by the ...
author of the "Thinking Machine" stories."), Kip Williams writes:
No, that was Jacques Futrelle. I love those stories. There's a
novel, too, available at Project Gutenberg. I picked up a number
of the stories online too, possibly from "Black Mask", or maybe
Gutenberg Australia.
For a long time, I only knew approximately three of the stories. I
knew the author had perished early (a watery grave) and thought
those might be all. My first indication to the contrary was in a
somewhat offbeat Ellery Queen anthology in which the names of the
detectives were disguised and it was given as a challenge to the
reader to determine who "Titus J.Z.F. DeWitt" really was. At any
rate, the story, "The Superfluous Finger," was one I hadn't read
before. Somewhat later, the two Dover collections crossed my path.
Great stuff. [-kw]
Evelyn responds, "Mea culpa. I confused 'The Thinking Machine"
with 'Dr. Thorndyke'." [-ecl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: PANDORA AND THE FLYING DUTCHMAN (letter of comment by Arthur
Kaletsky)
In response to Mark's comments on PANDORA AND THE FLYING DUTCHMAN
in the 10/29/10 issue of the MT VOID, Arthur Kaletsky writes:
If it's the restoration I saw at the Cambridge Arts a few months
ago, it's really sumptious and deserves to be seen on the biggest
screen you can get. The story is pretty much straight seafarer
mythology schmaltz so see it just for the atmosphere and the pretty
locations, actors, costumes and sets. The Hemingway character
parallel is apt.
SPOILER ALERT: There is a link to the Greek Pandora: a dreamt
Gardner is the model for a painting of her and the box. END
SPOILER
Is there an open web archive of the MT VOID? It'd be a lot more
convenient than the email folder I keep MT VOIDs in. [-ak]
Evelyn responds, "As we noted a few months ago, an index of back
issues may be found at http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm."
[-ecl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: BRUNELLESCHI'S DOME (letter of comment by Peter Rubinstein)
In Evelyn's review of BRUNELLESCHI'S DOME in the 11/05/10 issue of
the MT VOID, she wrote, "This is the largest masonry dome in the
world (143 feet in diameter, beginning at 170 feet above the floor
of the cathedral and with a final height of 295 meters, or 375 feet
including the lantern)." [-ecl]
Pete Rubinstein writes:
375 feet? That's not 295 meters. It isn't 295 meters minus 170
feet. I got the following off the Net:
*Dimensions and characteristics*
The dome's springing point stands 177 feet above ground level,
while its height from the drum base to the top is about 108
feet. The distance between two opposite edges of the exterior
octagonal base is about 176 feet. The height of the lantern
atop the dome is slightly more than 72 feet. The dome weighs an
estimated 37,000 metric tons, and the number of bricks used in
the structure may exceed four million.
I'm going to have to look at that 295 meters number askance as
well. Is this dome really 7 times higher than it is wide????
Doesn't look like it in any pictures that I've seen." [-pr]
Evelyn responds, "And all this from mis-typing one word--what I
should have typed was that the height was 295 *feet* (not counting
the lantern). 375 feet is the height including the lantern. I
think I ran into problems because the book may have given the
measurements in meters and I converted them for our primarily
American readership." [-ecl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
Continuing with my comment on research for our Italian trip...
In browsing the shelves for the books on the list, I ran across
other books that seemed worth reading. For example, THE GHETTO OF
VENICE: A HISTORY by Riccardo Calimani (translated by Katherine
Silberblatt Wolfthal) (ISBN-10 0-87131-484-3) seemed important to
read, and its was indeed a very thorough history of the Ghetto,
starting in 1152 (well before its actual establishment in 1516) and
continuing past its dissolution in 1797 up through World War II.
It is heavily researched (the bibliography lists 400 sources!), but
even so, I caught at least one error: Calimani refers to the
Mourner's Kaddish as supreme Hebrew poetry, when it fact it is
Aramaic. Still, it is a very comprehensive history of the Jews in
Venice, so obviously it would be of interest to Jews planning on
visiting Venice.
MUSSOLINI'S ROMAN EMPIRE by Denis Mack Smith (ISBN-10 0-670-49652-
9) was also not on the list, but I saw it on the shelf and thought
it looked like it covered an aspect of Italy that the list
overlooked. As I noted, all the books seem to cover the
Renaissance or later, but they also seemed to skip a large chunk
between, say, Napoleon and the present. There was one book about
the World War II period, but it was MUSSOLINI'S ROME: REBUILDING
THE ETERNAL CITY, which sounds like it is about Fascist
architecture. MUSSOLINI'S ROMAN EMPIRE covers the foreign policy
of Italy from 1922 until 1945, and there are a lot of lessons to be
learned even now. Mussolini's approach was all form and no
substance:
"Churchill's technique was quite different when he offered people
toils, tears, and bloodshed. Mussolini rather preferred to keep
the appearance of normality and whenever possible make the war seem
painless and easy. Hence he made no order for general
mobilisation, and newspapers were told to play down the fact of
casualties. He admitted that this was no way to win a war, but
thought that the major need was to keep up morale. Some Italians,
on the other hand, were shocked to find so little disturbance of
ordinary civilian life, and after being preached at for so long
about the superb discipline and idealism of war, were disillusioned
to learn of far more serious and dedicated attitudes adopted in
other belligerent countries. But fascism continued to think it a
matter for boasting that so little was demanded from Italians and
that there was no general mobilisation. To put this differently,
resources were considered to be less usefully spent in war
production than in fuelling the great propaganda industry which was
trying to convince ordinary citizens that all was well."
Back to the list: DARK WATER: FLOOD AND REDEMPTION IN THE CITY OF
MASTERPIECES by Robert Clark (ISBN 9780-7679-2648-5) is about the
1966 flood in Florence. Yes, Florence--when one talks about
flooding in Italy, Venice is the city that comes to mind, but on
November 4, 1966, the Arno massively overflowed its banks, covering
almost all of the center of Florence, with the Santa Croce
neighborhood being under *twenty feet* of water. While in the
Uffizi Museum they managed to move all the art to floors over the
water (ten feet in that area), thousands of other works were not as
fortunate. Clark tells the story of the recovery and restoration
of some of those works, centering his attention on Cimabue's
"Crocifisso" (a painting on wood). I guess my knowledge of Italian
art is deficient, because I had never heard of this and still am
not sure why it is so important. I did learn that it is the center
of controversy because of the method of restoration, which some say
ruined it.
Clark writes about the problem of raising money for art
restoration. While it might make sense to spend the funds to
restore (or at least stabilize) less well-known works whose need is
more urgent, it is almost impossible to raise funds unless the
works targeted are well-known works by well-known artists. But
there were those who worked on less publicized projects. Clark's
book is also about the "angeli del fango" ("mud angels")--people
who just showed up and went to work. One that got very little
notice was Luciano Camerino, a survivor of Auschwitz. "[On]
November 6 he'd dropped everything and gone north [from his home in
Rome] to Florence. He'd heard there was a synagogue in Via Farina
that held some 120 priceless scrolls of the Law plus fifteenth-,
sixteenth-, and seventeenth-century commentaries--fifteen thousand
volumes--of inestimable scholarly and antiquarian value. Camerino
arrived late that day and worked largely alone and almost
continuously for the next seventy-two hours. The only way to save
the 120 scrolls of the Law was to unroll each one--all 130 to 165
feet of it--and drape it over chairs, up and down the aisles, like
drying pasta. He labored without food or rest or joy, as they'd
labored in the camps. But he was saving the Word, the Law, and the
Prophets. After the third day, he raised his palm to his forehead,
staggered, and fell dead, of cardiac arrest it was said afterward.
The flaw in the heart--his or the world's--that had been tracking
him since 1943 had found him."
WHEN IN ROME: A JOURNAL OF LIFE IN VATICAN CITY by Robert J.
Hutchinson (ISBN 978-0-385-48647-7) is, according to one of the
blurbs, "a witty, delightfully disrespectable travelogue through
the Vatican." Here are two samples:
"Over the years, various systems analysts and business consultants
have studied the Vatican's organizational structure and concluded
that it is one of the most efficiently run operations on earth--a
conclusion that only causes incredulity, if not hysterical shrieks
of laughter, from the jaded Vatican press corps and anyone else who
has spent any time at all in curial offices."
and
"The mentality, rampant throughout Italy, is pretty much: Why get a
fax machine when carrier pigeons have done such a magnificent job
all these centuries?"
(My only complaint has nothing to do with the book, but rather with
its former owner, who seemed to be on a massive underlining
campaign, and at times avoided underlining an entire page only by
skipping the conjunctions, prepositions, and articles, while
underlining almost every noun, verb, adjective, and adverb. How
useful could this possibly be?)
Having found this book interesting, I returned to "off-list"
reading with some of Hutchinson source works: PETER'S KINGDOM:
INSIDE THE PAPAL CITY by Jerrold M. Packard (ISBN 0-684-18430-3)
and O VATICAN!: A SLIGHTLY WICKED VIEW OF THE HOLY SEE by Paul
Hoffman (ISBN 0-86553-101-3). I skimmed through these, because to
a great extent Hutchinson had covered the main details of the
history of the Pope, the Papal States, and the Vatican. There were
some anecdotes in these, and PETER'S KINGDOM had a more thorough
discussion of the Vatican banking scandals of the 1970s and 1980s,
but they are somewhat outdated. I realize that's an odd thing to
say about books about a 2000-year-old institution, but O VATICAN!
was published in 1984 and PETER'S KINGDOM in 1985 and both are
heavily weighted towards describing the Vatican as it was then.
(WHEN IN ROME was published in 1998.) O VATICAN!, in particular,
is full of biographies and anecdotes of the people then in
positions in the Holy See. And of course they both pre-date the
current abuse scandals shaking the Catholic Church. Unless you're
extremely interested in the Vatican, one of these three would be
sufficient.
Yet more on books on Italy next week. [-ecl]
==================================================================
Mark Leeper
mleeper@optonline.net
Imagination is more important than knowledge.
--Albert Einstein