THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
01/14/11 -- Vol. 29, No. 29, Whole Number 1632
Frick: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
Frack: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
All material is copyrighted by author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent will be assumed authorized for inclusion
unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Topics:
Questions about Myth II (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Yes, That Was Me (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
More Short Takes (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
EL SUPERSTAR: THE UNLIKELY RISE OF JUAN FRANCES (film review
by Mark R. Leeper)
Muscle Man Films (letters of comment by Kip Williams,
Keith F. Lynch, David Goldfarb, and Tim Bateman)
Time-Spanning Characters (letters of comment by
Keith F. Lynch, Kip Williams, Philip Chee, and
David Goldfarb)
THE UNINVITED, THE BAD SEED, and HIGHWAY IN THE SKY (letter
of comment by Kip Williams)
Bacchantes (letter of comment by Sam Long)
WAITING FOR SUPERMAN (letter of comment by David G. Leeper)
Radio Adaptations (letter of comment by Keith F. Lynch)
This Week's Reading (SUPER SAD TRUE LOVE STORY, THE LOST
BOOKS OF THE ODYSSEY, and ECOLOGICAL IMPERIALISM)
(book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
==================================================================
TOPIC: Questions about Myth II (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
I have more questions on the subject of myth.
Chiron collects coins from the people he ferries them to Hades.
There are probably enough people dying for him to have a sizable
income, but then where can he spend them. Is there any place
decent within walking distance when he goes on lunch break? Is the
pay sufficient to compensate him for the lousy neighborhood he has
to work in? And isn't the job awfully depressing? [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Yes, That Was Me (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
As I said last week:
Several people (well, some people anyway) have asked me was that my
name that they heard on National Public Radio on Sunday morning,
January 2. In fact it was my name. Every Sunday morning NPR has
the Sunday Puzzle hosted by Puzzlemaster Will Shortz. They have a
participant from the radio audience try to answer Will's questions.
At the end of each puzzle Shortz gives the listeners a puzzle of
their own to work on and next week and they can submit their
answers. The next week's participant is chosen at random from
among the people who submitted the correct answer to the current
week's question. That question that goes out to all the listeners
is a puzzle that has been submitted by a listener to Shortz off-
air. The first audience puzzle of 2011 was submitted to Shortz
from Mark Leeper of Matawan, New Jersey: "Take a plural noun that
ends with the letter 'S'. Insert a space somewhere in this word,
retaining the order of the letters. The result will be a two-word
phrase that has the same meaning as the original word, except in
the singular. What word is this?"
The word is "ayes". Put a space into it and it can become "a yes".
The answer to the other question is "Truffaut" whose name sounds
like "true"+"faux".
[-mrl]
[The puzzle about "ayes" was apparently a very difficult one; they
had fewer than 200 entries. They normally get about a thousand or
more. -ecl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: More Short Takes (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Three weeks ago I started writing short reviews of 2010 films that
I did not have time to review in more length. Here are a few more.
Two films superficially similar in style but plot-wise quite
different show the difference of the American and European
approaches to making visually inventive--if that is the word--
films. The American film is SCOTT PILGRIM VS. THE WORLD. This is
the story of a young rock musician who faces epic battles in his
effort to get a girlfriend and to form a successful garage band.
The other film is MICMACS, a French fantasy about a common man who
is waging a war against two big arms manufacturers. The plots are
very different. Both films are marvelously inventive visually.
Nearly anything can happen in a scene from either film. Edgar
Wright co-wrote and directed SCOTT PILGRIM VS. THE WORLD, and
previously directed SHAUN OF THE DEAD and HOT FUZZ. He uses a
gamut of digital computer effects. On the other hand Jean-Pierre
Jeunet (who previously directed DELICATESSEN, THE CITY OF LOST
CHILDREN, and AMELIE) uses more organically created images. As far
as I could tell there is not one computer effect MICMACS. The film
was or at least could have been made using only pre-CGI image-
creation. Somehow knowing that he had to create his effects, and
that a lot of the humor works without visual effects, make MICMACS
the better of the two films.
SCOTT PILGRIM Rating: high +1 on the -4 to +4 scale or 6/10
MICMACS Rating: high +2 on the -4 to +4 scale or 8/10
IT'S KIND OF A FUNNY STORY
Contrary to the title it is not really much of a funny story. A
suicidal teenager Craig goes to a hospital hoping just to get drugs
that will make him feel better. Instead he is sent to a mental
hospital for a minimum of five days. Luckily he finds he is not seriously
suicidal, he is just sort of suicidal. But over his five
days he makes friends and helps the other internees as well as
being helped by them. I think the idea was that they could get a
ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST dynamic without vilifying any nasty
doctors or any really disturbed patients. The film is pat and
bland. In trying to be inoffensive it takes the easy route and
becomes a film with no edge at all and above all it is dishonest.
There is no recognition in the film that mental illness does
anything to people but make them a little quirky and at worst
stand-offish. And Craig meets some really nice mental patients,
including the leader of the mental patient community, the affable
and friendly Bobby and the cute Noele. In the end everybody gets
something valuable from everybody else. The once suicidal Craig
had made some lifetime buddies and now feels really good about
himself. For a film set in a mental institution, this is just a
light piece of froth. The same pair of people (Anna Boden and Ryan
Fleck) write and direct who previously wrote and directed the
serious and very hard edge film HALF NELSON about a crack-addicted
teacher and the destruction he causes. One feels if they were
writing that film today the teacher would turn to his loving class
and discover that hugs are better than drugs. The film is good
hearted, but that is not enough to make it worth the prices of a
movie ticket. Rating: 0 on the -4 to +4 scale or 4/10
WHITE MATERIAL [Spoiler warning]
This is a French film directed by Claire Denis. In an unnamed
country in Africa things are falling apart as rebel forces fight
with thug-like government troops. Caught in the middle of this on
a coffee plantation is Maria Vial. Her husband's family have run
this plantation for years. Now she has to run the place on her
own. She has to cope with a rebellious son and a father-in-law who
is deteriorating. Most of the help have fled for fear of being
caught between the government troops and the rebels. What is worse
a major revolutionary figure who goes by the nickname "the boxer"
is hiding in the plantation. But with indomitable spirit and
against terrible odds she determines that she will not just keep the
plantation but she will also get the current crop in. What she
discovers at a painful and expensive price is that when the odds
become too great, an indomitable spirit is more a liability to her
family than an asset. She realizes too late that it may be better
to run than to face certain--or even likely--death. It might be
disingenuous of me to say this, but the theme seems very French.
Rating: +2 on the -4 to +4 scale or 7/10
[-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: EL SUPERSTAR: THE UNLIKELY RISE OF JUAN FRANCES (film review
by Mark R. Leeper)
CAPSULE: This is a pseudo-documentary about the minuscule rise and
subsequent fall of a Scots-English man who was raised Mexican and
who despite his non-Mexican look and lack of talent is determined
to be a Ranchera singer. The film is trying to say something about
assimilation and cultural identity, but there are better and
clearer films on the subject out there. Some of the humor is
amusing and some just falls flat. The highpoint of the film is the
performance of the two familiar actors, Lupe Ontiveros and Danny
Trejo. Amy French and Spencer John French act and star in the film
with Amy also directing. Rating: 0 (-4 to +4) or 4/10
The success of THIS IS SPINAL TAP paved the way for a whole genre
of satirical pseudo-documentaries. By now a market has been
saturated. A new mockumentary has to offer a fairly sharp wit or
it could go ignored. Christopher Guest seems to have the knack;
the Frenches need practice. Ranchera is a style of music from
Mexico that is generally done with one singer and one guitar. And
the singer generally looks Mexican. As the film opens we see Juan
Frances has arrived for a gig, but people do not believe he is a
ranchera singer because he looks even more gringo than most
gringos. He is pudgy, rose-complected, and balding. This is Juan
Frances, born Jonathan French (played by Spencer John French). He
is of English-Scots heritage, but his parents died when he was
three months old and he was adopted by his Chicano nanny, Nena
(Lupe Ontiveros from EL NORTE and REAL WOMEN HAVE CURVES) and
E. J. (Danny Trejo of MACHETE). Both of these performances are
real assets to the film, by the way. Trejo is one of these actors
like The Rock who comes from a very different background but who
looks really good on camera from the very first frame. Trejo and
Ontiveros go together on the screen like Ossie Davis and Ruby Dee.
But I digress.
As a boy Juan Frances saw a vision of the Virgin of Guadaloupe and
came away convinced that he had to be a singer. He writes and
sings his own songs and nobody seems to notice he is terrible at
both. Now he is 33, the same age that Jesus was when he was
crucified. In what he calls his "Jesus Year" Juan is going to try
to become a great ranchera star. Though he looks and dresses like
a gas station attendant, he intends to become a glamorous
attraction. Ready to use him are a manager and a sexy stage
partner (David Franco and Maria Esquivel). Juan has surprises
ahead, but none that are worth the wait.
EL SUPERSTAR has not much of interest happening in the minimal
plot. It is more a character piece and seems to be groping toward
some message having to do with people pretending to be what they
are not. Along the way it pokes what is intended to be fun at both
the Chicano culture and the white culture. Having funny enough
gags would make or break this film and sadly they do more of the
latter. Only about one gag in ten is really amusing. When they
start naming the organizations that arise in the plot with acronyms
like P.U.P.U., P.U.B.E.S., and C.A.C.A., it signals a sort of
desperation in the writing. Remarkably, one of the film's
executive producers is Norman Lear who should know how to make
ethnicity and culture based humor work.
While there are sequences that are amusing, the script does not
seem to have been ready for the camera. Norman Lear should have
been able to introduce the Frenches to someone who could have
gotten more humor out of the premise. I rate this film a 0 on the
-4 to +4 scale or 4/10. It will be released direct to DVD on
January 18, 2011.
Film Credits: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0855846
What others are saying:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/el_superstar/
[-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Muscle Man Films (letters of comment by Kip Williams, Keith
F. Lynch, David Goldfarb, and Tim Bateman)
In response to Mark's comments on Italian muscle man films in the
12/31/10 issue of the MT VOID, Kip Williams writes:
Chances are, he might not have been Goliath in the original. Going
back to silent days, there was a tradition of Italian movies about
a muscle-bound fellow named Maciste. In bringing these into
English, they decided nobody outside of Italy cared about Maciste,
so they gave him another monicker. I don't know if all Hercules
movies were about Maciste (or even any), but at least some of the
Italian strongmen were rebranded Macistes.
The old public TV series, "The Amazing Years of Cinema", narrated
by Douglas Fairbanks, Jr., told me a bit about this character. I
could stand to watch my third-hand VHS dub of the whole series
(which stands up pretty well, considering I've had it since about
1985). [-kw]
Keith F. Lynch responds:
The following movies are on a DVD collection I bought. (I haven't
yet watched any of them).
"Hercules Unchained" (a.k.a. "Ercole e la regina di Lidia")
"Hercules and the Captive Women" (a.k.a. "Ercole alla conquista di
Atlantide")
"Hercules and the Tyrants of Babylon" (a.k.a. "Ercole contro i
tiranni di Babilonia")
"Son Of Hercules: The Land of Darkness" (a.k.a. "Ercole
l'invincibile")
Does anyone know if these are part of the same series as Mark is
referring to? [-kfl]
Evelyn answers:
There is an entire genre in Italy called "Peplum" (a.k.a. "Sword
and Sandal"), which includes Hercules, Maciste, Samson, Goliath,
and others. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sword_and_Sandal
for series lists. The ones you list are in the Hercules series;
the Maciste and Goliath series are separate.
And he was Goliath in the original of the movie Mark was
describing--the Italian title was "Golia e il cavaliere
mascherato". [-ecl]
David Goldfarb says:
"Ercole" seems to me obviously cognate with "Hercules", so at the
very least there hasn't been any rebranding going on there. [-dg]
Tim Bateman notes:
I found it interesting that the titles were changed when
translated, however minimally in one instance. [-tb]
Mark replies:
The titles were sometimes drastically changed.
There was a film set in 15th Century Spain entitled "Zorro contro
Maciste" or Zorro Against Maciste. It really did have Zorro but no
Maciste. Any character who was strong was could be called
something that was either "Maciste" or some famous strongman from
folklore like Hercules, Atlas, Ursus, Goliath, a Son of Hercules,
ad nauseum.
Oh, and when "Zorro contro Maciste" was brought to the United
States it was retitled "Samson and the Slave Queen." Honest.
[-mrl]
Keith F. Lynch then responded:
Zorro sure got around. I wonder what character, other than a time
traveler or someone explicitly said to be very long-lived, has been
set over the greatest span of time? [For a continuation of this
sub-thread, see the next topic. -ecl]
Apparently the ancients were especially guilty of this [renaming of
characters], with many of them writing under the name of someone
else renowned in their field, causing no end to confusion.
Did Zorro become Samson, and Maciste the Slave Queen, or vice
versa? [-kfl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Time-Spanning Characters (letters of comment by Keith
F. Lynch, Kip Williams, Philip Chee, and David Goldfarb)
In the topic above, Keith F. Lynch asked, "I wonder what character,
other than a time traveler or someone explicitly said to be very
long-lived, has been set over the greatest span of time?"
Kip Williams guesses:
Nancy Drew? [-kw]
Philip Chee responds:
The Phantom?
Brenda Starr?
Nick Fury? (Originally "Sgt. Fury and his Howling Commandos"
eventually promoted to Colonel Fury of S.H.I.E.L.D.) One issue
explained his longevity by his having to take an annual dose of
something called the "Infinity Formula" but this was never alluded
to again and in some continuities this story is non-canonical.
Any number of Marvel/DC superheroes and the timeslip effect.
Captain America (suspended animation)
The characters in THE FOREVER WAR (relativistic time dilation).
MAROONED IN REALTIME by someone or other I forget. Vinge? [-pc]
Keith responds:
Wasn't [The Phantom] different people at different times, each one
the son of the previous? [-kfl]
Philip replies:
"Yes but it was the *same* character, just hereditary. You did specify
"character" rather than person." [-pc]
Keith also says:
When's the earliest and latest [Nancy Drew, Brenda Starr, and Nick
Fury] were set? Remember, we started with Zorro, traditionally a
19th-century characters, in the 15th century.
If [Sgt. Fury is] WWII, he still has a couple centuries to go to
catch up to Zorro.
[Re Marvel/DC, Captain America, THE FOREVER WAR:] I was asking
about *unexplained* longevity.
Yes, [MAROONED IN REALTIME was] Vinge. That was a fun 50 million
year romp, including building a castle then jumping ahead a few
centuries so that it would be picturesque ruins. And jumping
ahead to an ice age just to have a brief snowball fight.
If you count *explained* longevity, I think Poul Anderson probably
holds the record. Sure, in Haldeman's THE FOREVER WAR, people
went to the end of time, but in Anderson's TAU ZERO and again in
his "Flight to Forever" they went *beyond* it, into the next cycle.
("Futurama" recently did the exact same thing as "Flight to
Forever." I hope they paid royalties to Karen [Anderson].)
[-kfl]
David Goldfarb replies:
No, [in THE FOREVER WAR] they didn't [go to the end of time]. They
only went a couple thousand years ahead. [-dg]
And Keith replies:
Looks like you're right. I know I read a novel in which mankind
was at war with another species right up to the Big Crunch at the
end of time. I wonder what novel that was, since it obviously
wasn't THE FOREVER WAR. [-kfl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: THE UNINVITED, THE BAD SEED, and HIGHWAY IN THE SKY (letter
of comment by Kip Williams)
In response to Mark's comments on Turner Classic Movies in January
in the 01/07/11 issue of the MT VOID, Kip Williams writes:
I know I saw a little bit of THE UNINVITED on channel 7 (Denver)
back in the 1960s, when I had no clue about what I was seeing.
Every time I see the title now, I start out thinking it's the one
Raymond Chandler wrote a screenplay for, but that was THE UNSEEN,
which I think was a follow-up in some sense. (Looking up Chandler
in the IMDB shows his name on a whole bunch of scripts, but it
turns out they're nearly all variants of STRANGERS ON A TRAIN, and
his screenplay for that was trashed by Mr. Hitchcock, and nobody
seems to have saved a copy. Unfortunately.)
I wanted to see THE BAD SEED so much for so long. I read the
script several times. When the chance finally came along, I set
the VCR with high hopes, and erased it immediately. Patty
McCormack seemed completely artificial and unbelievable. Perhaps I
should try it again, now that my expectations aren't so high.
There was a TV movie with David Carradine as the handyman. I
didn't care much for that one either, as a whole, but there was one
brilliant scene with Carradine's childish character taunting the
kid about how the police had a special bloodhound who was trained
to find sticks that had been used as murder weapons--a stick
bloodhound. I wish the whole movie had been that good.
I already missed HIGHWAY IN THE SKY. I saw a bit of it. Looked
interesting. [-kw]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Bacchantes (letter of comment by Sam Long)
In response to Mark's comments on the Bacchantes in the 01/07/11
issue of the MT VOID, Sam Long writes:
See Wikipedia s.v. Maenad (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maenad).
I've always been of the understanding that the bacchantes and
maenads were the women of the community, particularly the young
women of the community, who on the special feast days were
"released", if that's the word, from their familial
responsibilities and allowed, even encouraged, to get drunk and run
about in worship of the god--Dionysus or Bacchus--of the city or
region. These celebrations were religious and patriotic
ceremonies, rather far removed from what we consider religious and
patriotic ceremonies these days, but religious and patriotic
ceremonies nonetheless, that it was a citizen's--or citizeness's--
duty to take part in. At least this would've been so during the
mythological period during the late 2nd millenium B.C.E., if not
during the Classical period of the time of Pericles and Socrates.
The fall of Troy, late in the mythological period, is supposed to
have taken place in about 1200 B.C.E., not far in time from the
biblical Exodus. We come from legend or myth into "history" both
in Greece and in the Levant, about 1000 B.C.E. or so.
The word for the Dionysiac celebrations was "orgy"; and this word
did not originally have a meaning of sexual or alcoholic
immorality. Plain, ordinary, sober, restrained temple services for
virgin goddesses like Athena or Artemis were also called "orgies".
So, to answer your questions about Bacchantes, no, they apparently
were not a class of women in ancient Greece (unlike the heterae, or
courtesans, who were the "geishas" of the Classical period).
P.S.: Mary Renault and Robert Graves have both written novels in
which maenads and bacchantes play parts. Graves's The Greek Myths"
would have more information too. [-sl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: WAITING FOR SUPERMAN (letter of comment by David G. Leeper)
In response to Mark's "Top Ten Films of 2010" comments in the
01/07/11 issue of the MT VOID, David G. Leeper writes:
Good list of 2010 movies, bro ...
I just put 4 of them on my Netflix "save" list.
I'm especially interested in WAITING FOR SUPERMAN because I've
taught twice now in a charter school that appears to be doing a
great job in a poor district with very limited cash but some
dedicated teachers & students. They have an extended school day,
doubling up on the math and English classes. 7th graders are doing
plane geometry with proofs ... I don't think [our high school in]
Longmeadow taught that until the 10th grade. There is no bus
service, so parents have to carpool or make other arrangements ...
I think that automatically gets kids from families where the
parents really care ... so it's no random sample. It's first-come
first-serve so anyone can attend, but there's a waiting list. The
rules are very strict, and anyone who doesn't like it is free to go
to some other school. Tuition is free, paid by the state. One
day, someone may do a documentary about this school. [-dgl]
Mark responds: "Starting geometry with proofs sounds like a good
idea, but I am not so sure it is. Some schools seem to be
following an approach that they teach a little bit of algebra, a
little geometry, a little statistics, and a little probability each
year. In the right hands that would not be a bad idea, but I don't
think the results are as good as you get with one year of Algebra
I, a year of geometry, and a year of Algebra II. With that
approach you can go into the year's subject intensively. With the
goulash approach they are teaching the same material over and over.
And I think that the students are learning less." [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Radio Adaptations (letter of comment by Keith F. Lynch)
In response to Mark's comments on radio adaptations of THE TIME
MACHINE in the 01/07/11 issue of the MT VOID, Keith F. Lynch
writes, "Interestingly, I recently discovered Stapledon's 'Far
Future Calling'" the script of a radio play, in a collection by the
same name. It's yet another retelling of LAST AND FIRST MEN,
though it suffers considerably from trying to compress two billion
years of future history into a short radio program. The premise is
that the Neptunians break into a contemporary radio broadcast to
tell their story." [-kfl]
Evelyn adds, "I reviewed the collection FAR FUTURE CALLING in when
it came out in 1979, and said, 'The play is based on (a very small
segment of) LAST AND FIRST MEN, and unfortunately fails to
communicate the scope of that work.' (I thought that review was
for 'Delap's F&SF Review', but that does not seem to have been
published in that year.) For the full review, see
http://leepers.us/reviews/rev-s5.htm#farfuture." [-ecl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
SUPER SAD TRUE LOVE STORY by Gary Shteyngart (ISBN 978-1-4000-6640-
7) is one of those "stealth science fiction" novels, written by a
mainstream/literary author and marketed as a mainstream/literary
novel. But it is definitely science fiction, and if Charles Stross
or some other science fiction author had written it, it would be
marketed as such.
I choose Stross because this is a novel of future economics. The
United States is falling apart, because people are so busy
following media people who are streaming shows about fashion,
entertainment, and each other that they have no time to follow
anything having to do with the real world: economics, science,
politics, or even reading and writing. Books are dead (even
e-books) and everything is video. (Shades of FAHRENHEIT 451!)
China, Canada, and Norway (if I recall correctly) are the new world
powers, and the United States is basically a police state trying to
hold up a failing system. In the midst of all this Lenny Abramov
is working for a life extension company (where everyone is
obsessed with extending their lives and youthfulness) when he
meets Eunice Park, a young Korean woman who has a very different
attitude about, well, everything, than Lenny.
It is a sign of my age, I suppose, that I found the sections
consisting of Eunice's (and others') text messages very hard to
read. I must be the only person on the planet who texts in full
sentences with whole words, punctuation and everything. (On the
other hand, I have probably sent fewer than two dozen text messages
in my life.)
The resolution of SUPER SAD TRUE LOVE STORY seems a bit weak, but
the picture of what America could become is worth the read.
Another example of stealth science fiction is THE LOST BOOKS OF THE
ODYSSEY by Zachary Mason (ISBN 978-0-374-19215-0). It is subtitled
on the cover "A NOVEL", but it is not. It consists of 44 vignettes
of alternative events in the life of Odysseus, events which are
often mutually exclusive. For example, in "Penelope's Elegy"
Odysseus returns home to find Penelope dead, while in "A Sad
Revelation" she has remarried, and in "A Night in the Woods" a
third scenario unfolds. The stories, or vignettes (the longest is
still under 3000 words), do form a unified whole--not a novel, but
a series of meditations on the subject of Odysseus. Mason goes
back to the original meaning of "Odyssey" as being the story of
Odysseus, and some vignettes occur outside the ten-year period
covered in Homer's "Odyssey".
This raises an interesting question in terms of Hugo nominations.
The definition for Best Novel calls for "a science fiction or
fantasy story of forty thousand (40,000) words or more." It makes
little sense to nominate the individual pieces as short stories,
but the book as a whole seems ineligible.
My one complaint about THE LOST BOOKS OF THE ODYSSEY is that Mason
(or his editors) felt it necessary to footnote several of the
references to the original ODYSSEY. For example, a comment Odysseus
makes about not killing the Cyclops because he and his men would
then be trapped is footnoted with an explanation of how the Cyclops
had them in his cave with a massive boulder that only the Cyclops
could move blocking the door. I find it hard to believe that the
people reading this book would be unfamiliar with the ODYSSEY.
ECOLOGICAL IMPERIALISM: THE BIOLOGICAL EXPANSION OF EUROPE, 900-
1900 by Alfred W. Crosby (ISBN 978-0-521-33613-0) was one of the
textbooks for Geography 10 at the University of California at
Berkeley. This was a course available through podcasts, or at
least mostly available--the course included several films, and
audio podcasts are not the best medium for a course which features
a lot of maps. However, I was able to gather some useful
information, and decided that reading this textbook would be
worthwhile.
Crosby wrote this in 1986, well before Jared Diamond's GUNS, GERMS,
AND STEEL, and Diamond seems to have gotten a lot of his ideas
either from Crosby, or from Crosby's sources. There's nothing
wrong with this, of course, but I suspect most people think Diamond
originated it all. Crosby covers just about everything Diamond
does, and more besides, such as how the existence of Pangaea meant
that evolution had a very different effect before its break-up 200
million years ago (or so) than after.
One of the films for the course, by the way, was GRASS (1925). This
silent documentary of nomadic herders in Iraq and Iran was
sufficiently popular that its filmmakers were able to get funding
for their next film: KING KONG. [-ecl]
==================================================================
Mark Leeper
mleeper@optonline.net
Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone,
somewhere, may be happy.
--H. L. Mencken